<rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3136">
    <dct:isReferencedBy>IMPACT4SOIL</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>OpenAire</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>&#1053;&#1072;&#1094;&#1080;&#1086;&#1085;&#1072;&#1083;&#1100;&#1085;&#1099;&#1081; &#1072;&#1075;&#1088;&#1077;&#1075;&#1072;&#1090;&#1086;&#1088; &#1086;&#1090;&#1082;&#1088;&#1099;&#1090;&#1099;&#1093; &#1088;&#1077;&#1087;&#1086;&#1079;&#1080;&#1090;&#1086;&#1088;&#1080;&#1077;&#1074; &#1088;&#1086;&#1089;&#1089;&#1080;&#1081;&#1089;&#1082;&#1080;&#1093; &#1091;&#1085;&#1080;&#1074;&#1077;&#1088;&#1089;&#1080;&#1090;&#1077;&#1090;&#1086;&#1074; (HOPA)</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>Publikationenserver der Georg-August-Universit&#228;t G&#246;ttingen</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>Crossref</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>Microsoft Academic Graph</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isPartOf>Land Degradation &amp;amp; Development</dct:isPartOf>
    <dct:license>Open Access</dct:license>
    <dct:created>2018-08-18</dct:created>
    <dc:description>Abstract&lt;p&gt;Agroforestry (AF) has the potential to restore degraded lands, provide a broader range of ecosystem goods and services such as carbon (C) sequestration and high biodiversity, and increase soil fertility and ecosystem stability through additional C input from trees, erosion prevention, and microclimate improvement. Advantages and processes for global C sequestration in AF are unknown. We used a meta&#65506;&#65408;&#65424;analysis of 427 soil C stock data pairs grouped into four main AF systems&#65506;&#65408;&#65428;alley cropping, windbreaks, silvopastures, and homegardens&#65506;&#65408;&#65428;and evaluated changes in AF and adjacent control cropland or pasture. Mean soil C stocks in AF (1&#65506;&#65408;&#65424;m depth) were 126&#65474;&#65440;Mg&#65474;&#65440;C&#65474;&#65463;ha&#65506;&#65416;&#65426;1, which is 19% more than that in cropland or pasture. The highest C stocks in soil were in subtropical homegardens, AF with younger trees, and topsoil (0&#65506;&#65408;&#65427;20&#65474;&#65440;cm). Increased soil C stocks in AF were lower than aboveground C stocks in most AF systems, except alley cropping. Homegardens stored the highest C in both aboveground and belowground, especially in the subsoil (20&#65506;&#65408;&#65427;100&#65474;&#65440;cm). Advantages of AF ecosystem services focusing on mechanisms of belowground C sequestration were analyzed. AF could store 5.3&#65474;&#65440;&#65475;&#65431;&#65474;&#65440;109&#65474;&#65440;Mg additional C in soil on 944&#65474;&#65440;Mha globally, with most in the tropics and subtropics. AF systems could greatly contribute to global soil C sequestration if used in larger areas. Future investigations of AF should include (a) mechanistic&#65506;&#65408;&#65424; and process&#65506;&#65408;&#65424;based studies (instead of common monitoring and inventories), (b) models linking forest and crop growth with soil water and C and nutrient cycling, and (c) accurate assessments of the AF area worldwide based on the remote sensing approaches.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
    <dc:subject>meta-analysis</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>2. Zero hunger</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>570</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>550</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>13. Climate action</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>sustainable land use</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>homegardens</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>0401 agriculture, forestry, and fisheries</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>agroforestry management</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>04 agricultural and veterinary sciences</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>15. Life on land</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>ecosystem services</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>carbon sequestration</dc:subject>
    <dc:creator rdf:resource="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3189-3687"/>
    <dc:creator rdf:resource="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9863-8461"/>
    <dc:creator>Wenting Feng, Lingling Shi, Lingling Shi, Lingling Shi, Yakov Kuzyakov, Yakov Kuzyakov, Jianchu Xu, Jianchu Xu, </dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-09-04</dc:date>
    <dc:type>journalpaper</dc:type>
    <dct:abstract>Abstract&lt;p&gt;Agroforestry (AF) has the potential to restore degraded lands, provide a broader range of ecosystem goods and services such as carbon (C) sequestration and high biodiversity, and increase soil fertility and ecosystem stability through additional C input from trees, erosion prevention, and microclimate improvement. Advantages and processes for global C sequestration in AF are unknown. We used a meta&#65506;&#65408;&#65424;analysis of 427 soil C stock data pairs grouped into four main AF systems&#65506;&#65408;&#65428;alley cropping, windbreaks, silvopastures, and homegardens&#65506;&#65408;&#65428;and evaluated changes in AF and adjacent control cropland or pasture. Mean soil C stocks in AF (1&#65506;&#65408;&#65424;m depth) were 126&#65474;&#65440;Mg&#65474;&#65440;C&#65474;&#65463;ha&#65506;&#65416;&#65426;1, which is 19% more than that in cropland or pasture. The highest C stocks in soil were in subtropical homegardens, AF with younger trees, and topsoil (0&#65506;&#65408;&#65427;20&#65474;&#65440;cm). Increased soil C stocks in AF were lower than aboveground C stocks in most AF systems, except alley cropping. Homegardens stored the highest C in both aboveground and belowground, especially in the subsoil (20&#65506;&#65408;&#65427;100&#65474;&#65440;cm). Advantages of AF ecosystem services focusing on mechanisms of belowground C sequestration were analyzed. AF could store 5.3&#65474;&#65440;&#65475;&#65431;&#65474;&#65440;109&#65474;&#65440;Mg additional C in soil on 944&#65474;&#65440;Mha globally, with most in the tropics and subtropics. AF systems could greatly contribute to global soil C sequestration if used in larger areas. Future investigations of AF should include (a) mechanistic&#65506;&#65408;&#65424; and process&#65506;&#65408;&#65424;based studies (instead of common monitoring and inventories), (b) models linking forest and crop growth with soil water and C and nutrient cycling, and (c) accurate assessments of the AF area worldwide based on the remote sensing approaches.&lt;/p&gt;</dct:abstract>
    <dc:title>Agroforestry systems: Meta-analysis of soil carbon stocks, sequestration processes, and future potentials</dc:title>
    <dc:identifier>10.1002/ldr.3136</dc:identifier>
    <dct:references>https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3136</dct:references>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>