<rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0109-1">
    <dct:isReferencedBy>IMPACT4SOIL</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>OpenAire</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>Crossref</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>Microsoft Academic Graph</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>Europe PubMed Central</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isPartOf>Oecologia</dct:isPartOf>
    <dct:license>Closed Access</dct:license>
    <dct:created>2005-07-07</dct:created>
    <dc:description>In arid ecosystems, the ability to rapidly capture nitrogen (N) from brief pulses is expected to influence plant growth, survival, and competitive ability. Theory and data suggest that N capture from pulses should depend on plant growth rate and availability of other limiting resources. Theory also predicts trade-offs in plant stress tolerance and ability to capture N from different size pulses. We injected K15NO3, to simulate small and large N pulses at three different times during the growing season into soil around the co-dominant Great Basin species Sarcobatus vermiculatus, Chrysothamnus nauseosus ssp. consimilis, and Distichlis spicata. Soils were amended with water and P in a partial factorial design. As predicted, all study species showed a comparable decline in N capture from large pulses through the season as growth rates slowed. Surprisingly, however, water and P availability differentially influenced the ability of these species to capture N from pulses. Distichlis N capture increased up to tenfold with water addition while Chrysothamnus N capture increased up to threefold with P addition. Sarcobatus N capture was not affected by water or P availability. Opposite to our prediction, Sarcobatus, the most stress tolerant species, captured less N from small pulses but more N from large pulses relative to the other species. These observations suggest that variation in N pulse timing and size can interact with variable soil water and P supply to determine how N is partitioned among co-existing Great Basin species.</dc:description>
    <dc:subject>2. Zero hunger</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>0106 biological sciences</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Nitrates</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Time Factors</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Nitrogen Isotopes</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Nitrogen</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Potassium Compounds</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Water</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Phosphorus</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>15. Life on land</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Plant Roots</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>01 natural sciences</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>California</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Plant Leaves</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Magnoliopsida</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Soil</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Seasons</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Plant Shoots</dc:subject>
    <dc:creator>Jeremy J. James, James H. Richards, </dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-07-08</dc:date>
    <dc:type>journalpaper</dc:type>
    <dct:abstract>In arid ecosystems, the ability to rapidly capture nitrogen (N) from brief pulses is expected to influence plant growth, survival, and competitive ability. Theory and data suggest that N capture from pulses should depend on plant growth rate and availability of other limiting resources. Theory also predicts trade-offs in plant stress tolerance and ability to capture N from different size pulses. We injected K15NO3, to simulate small and large N pulses at three different times during the growing season into soil around the co-dominant Great Basin species Sarcobatus vermiculatus, Chrysothamnus nauseosus ssp. consimilis, and Distichlis spicata. Soils were amended with water and P in a partial factorial design. As predicted, all study species showed a comparable decline in N capture from large pulses through the season as growth rates slowed. Surprisingly, however, water and P availability differentially influenced the ability of these species to capture N from pulses. Distichlis N capture increased up to tenfold with water addition while Chrysothamnus N capture increased up to threefold with P addition. Sarcobatus N capture was not affected by water or P availability. Opposite to our prediction, Sarcobatus, the most stress tolerant species, captured less N from small pulses but more N from large pulses relative to the other species. These observations suggest that variation in N pulse timing and size can interact with variable soil water and P supply to determine how N is partitioned among co-existing Great Basin species.</dct:abstract>
    <dc:title>Plant N Capture From Pulses: Effects Of Pulse Size, Growth Rate, And Other Soil Resources</dc:title>
    <dc:identifier>10.1007/s00442-005-0109-1</dc:identifier>
    <dct:references>https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0109-1</dct:references>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>