<rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0836-6">
    <dct:isReferencedBy>IMPACT4SOIL</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>OpenAire</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>Crossref</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>Microsoft Academic Graph</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>Europe PubMed Central</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isPartOf>Oecologia</dct:isPartOf>
    <dct:license>Closed Access</dct:license>
    <dct:created>2007-08-27</dct:created>
    <dc:description>The effects of global N enrichment on soil processes in grassland ecosystems have received relatively little study. We assessed microbial community response to experimental increases in N availability by measuring extracellular enzyme activity (EEA) in soils from three grasslands with contrasting edaphic and climatic characteristics: a semiarid grassland at the Sevilleta National Wildlife Refuge, New Mexico, USA (SEV), and mesic grasslands at Konza Prairie, Kansas, USA (KNZ) and Ukulinga Research Farm, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa (SAF). We hypothesized that, with N enrichment, soil microbial communities would increase C and P acquisition activity, decrease N acquisition activity, and reduce oxidative enzyme production (leading to recalcitrant soil organic matter [SOM] accumulation), and that the magnitude of response would decrease with soil age (due to higher stabilization of enzyme pools and P limitation of response). Cellulolytic activities followed the pattern predicted, increasing 35-52% in the youngest soil (SEV), 10-14% in the intermediate soil (KNZ) and remaining constant in the oldest soil (SAF). The magnitude of phosphatase response did not vary among sites. N acquisition activity response was driven by the enzyme closest to its pH optimum in each soil: i.e., leucine aminopeptidase in alkaline soil, beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase in acidic soil. Oxidative enzyme activity varied widely across ecosystems, but did not decrease with N amendment at any site. Likewise, SOM and %C pools did not respond to N enrichment. Between-site variation in both soil properties and EEA exceeded any treatment response, and a large portion of EEA variability (leucine aminopeptidase and oxidative enzymes), 68% as shown by principal components analysis, was strongly related to soil pH (r = 0.91, P &lt; 0.001). In these grassland ecosystems, soil microbial responses appear constrained by a molecular-scale (pH) edaphic factor, making potential breakdown rates of SOM resistant to N enrichment.</dc:description>
    <dc:subject>2. Zero hunger</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>0106 biological sciences</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Analysis of Variance</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Bacteria</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Nitrogen</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>New Mexico</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>04 agricultural and veterinary sciences</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Kansas</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>15. Life on land</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Poaceae</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>01 natural sciences</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Carbon</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Enzymes</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Soil</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>South Africa</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>0401 agriculture, forestry, and fisheries</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Biomass</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Ecosystem</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Soil Microbiology</dc:subject>
    <dc:creator rdf:resource="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0193-2892"/>
    <dc:creator rdf:resource="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1387-6426"/>
    <dc:creator>Scott L. Collins, Robert L. Sinsabaugh, Lydia H. Zeglin, Martina &#352;tursov&#225;, </dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-08-28</dc:date>
    <dc:type>journalpaper</dc:type>
    <dct:abstract>The effects of global N enrichment on soil processes in grassland ecosystems have received relatively little study. We assessed microbial community response to experimental increases in N availability by measuring extracellular enzyme activity (EEA) in soils from three grasslands with contrasting edaphic and climatic characteristics: a semiarid grassland at the Sevilleta National Wildlife Refuge, New Mexico, USA (SEV), and mesic grasslands at Konza Prairie, Kansas, USA (KNZ) and Ukulinga Research Farm, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa (SAF). We hypothesized that, with N enrichment, soil microbial communities would increase C and P acquisition activity, decrease N acquisition activity, and reduce oxidative enzyme production (leading to recalcitrant soil organic matter [SOM] accumulation), and that the magnitude of response would decrease with soil age (due to higher stabilization of enzyme pools and P limitation of response). Cellulolytic activities followed the pattern predicted, increasing 35-52% in the youngest soil (SEV), 10-14% in the intermediate soil (KNZ) and remaining constant in the oldest soil (SAF). The magnitude of phosphatase response did not vary among sites. N acquisition activity response was driven by the enzyme closest to its pH optimum in each soil: i.e., leucine aminopeptidase in alkaline soil, beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase in acidic soil. Oxidative enzyme activity varied widely across ecosystems, but did not decrease with N amendment at any site. Likewise, SOM and %C pools did not respond to N enrichment. Between-site variation in both soil properties and EEA exceeded any treatment response, and a large portion of EEA variability (leucine aminopeptidase and oxidative enzymes), 68% as shown by principal components analysis, was strongly related to soil pH (r = 0.91, P &lt; 0.001). In these grassland ecosystems, soil microbial responses appear constrained by a molecular-scale (pH) edaphic factor, making potential breakdown rates of SOM resistant to N enrichment.</dct:abstract>
    <dc:title>Microbial Responses To Nitrogen Addition In Three Contrasting Grassland Ecosystems</dc:title>
    <dc:identifier>10.1007/s00442-007-0836-6</dc:identifier>
    <dct:references>https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0836-6</dct:references>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>