<rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-008-9174-2">
    <dct:isReferencedBy>IMPACT4SOIL</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>OpenAire</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>CORE (RIOXX-UK Aggregator)</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>Research@WUR</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>UnpayWall</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>Crossref</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>Microsoft Academic Graph</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isPartOf>Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems</dct:isPartOf>
    <dct:license>Open Access</dct:license>
    <dct:created>2008-03-21</dct:created>
    <dc:description>Legume&#8211;maize rotation and maize nitrogen (N)-response trials were carried out simultaneously from 1998 to 2004 in two distinct agro-ecological environments of West Africa: the humid derived savannah (Ibadan) and the drier northern Guinea savannah (Zaria). In the N-response trial, maize was grown annually receiving urea N at 0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 kg N ha&#8722;1. In Ibadan, maize production increased with N fertilization, but mean annual grain yield declined over the course of the trial. In Zaria, no response to N treatments was observed initially, and an increase in the phosphorus (P) and sulphur (S) fertilizer application rate was required to increase yield across treatments and obtain a response to N applications, stressing the importance of non-N fertilizers in the savannah. In the rotation trial, a 2-year natural fallow&#8211;maize rotation was compared with maize rotated with different legume types: green manure, forage, dual-purpose, and grain legumes. The cultivation of some legume types resulted in a greater annual maize production relative to the fallow&#8211;maize combination and corresponding treatments in the N-response trial, while there was no gain in maize yield with other legume types. Large differences in the residual effects from legumes and fallow were also observed between sites, indicting a need for site-specific land management recommendations. In Ibadan, cultivation of maize after the forage legume (Stylosanthes guianensis) achieved the highest yield. The natural fallow&#8211;maize rotation had improved soil characteristics (Bray-I P, exchangeable potassium, calcium and magnesium) at the end of the trial relative to legume&#8211;maize rotations, and natural fallow resulted in higher maize yields than the green manure legume (Pueraria phaseoloides). In Zaria, maize following dual-purpose soybean achieved the highest mean yield. At both sites, variation in aboveground N and P dynamics of the legume and fallow vegetation could only partly explain the different residual effects on maize.</dc:description>
    <dc:subject>2. Zero hunger</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>forage legumes</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>agropastoral systems</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>northern guinea savanna</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>livestock systems</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Soil Science</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>biological nitrogen-fixation</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>increased crop production</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>continuous cultivation</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>04 agricultural and veterinary sciences</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>15. Life on land</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>0401 agriculture, forestry, and fisheries</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>farming systems</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>fertility management</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>organic-matter</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Agronomy and Crop Science</dc:subject>
    <dc:creator>Franke, A.C., Laberge, G., Oyewole, B.D., Schulz, S., Tobe, O., </dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-03-22</dc:date>
    <dc:type>journalpaper</dc:type>
    <dct:abstract>Legume&#8211;maize rotation and maize nitrogen (N)-response trials were carried out simultaneously from 1998 to 2004 in two distinct agro-ecological environments of West Africa: the humid derived savannah (Ibadan) and the drier northern Guinea savannah (Zaria). In the N-response trial, maize was grown annually receiving urea N at 0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 kg N ha&#8722;1. In Ibadan, maize production increased with N fertilization, but mean annual grain yield declined over the course of the trial. In Zaria, no response to N treatments was observed initially, and an increase in the phosphorus (P) and sulphur (S) fertilizer application rate was required to increase yield across treatments and obtain a response to N applications, stressing the importance of non-N fertilizers in the savannah. In the rotation trial, a 2-year natural fallow&#8211;maize rotation was compared with maize rotated with different legume types: green manure, forage, dual-purpose, and grain legumes. The cultivation of some legume types resulted in a greater annual maize production relative to the fallow&#8211;maize combination and corresponding treatments in the N-response trial, while there was no gain in maize yield with other legume types. Large differences in the residual effects from legumes and fallow were also observed between sites, indicting a need for site-specific land management recommendations. In Ibadan, cultivation of maize after the forage legume (Stylosanthes guianensis) achieved the highest yield. The natural fallow&#8211;maize rotation had improved soil characteristics (Bray-I P, exchangeable potassium, calcium and magnesium) at the end of the trial relative to legume&#8211;maize rotations, and natural fallow resulted in higher maize yields than the green manure legume (Pueraria phaseoloides). In Zaria, maize following dual-purpose soybean achieved the highest mean yield. At both sites, variation in aboveground N and P dynamics of the legume and fallow vegetation could only partly explain the different residual effects on maize.</dct:abstract>
    <dc:title>A Comparison Between Legume Technologies And Fallow, And Their Effects On Maize And Soil Traits, In Two Distinct Environments Of The West African Savannah</dc:title>
    <dc:identifier>10.1007/s10705-008-9174-2</dc:identifier>
    <dct:references>https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-008-9174-2</dct:references>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>