<rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0420-4">
    <dct:isReferencedBy>IMPACT4SOIL</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>OpenAire</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>Crossref</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>Microsoft Academic Graph</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>VTechWorks</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isPartOf>Plant and Soil</dct:isPartOf>
    <dct:license>Closed Access</dct:license>
    <dct:created>2010-05-19</dct:created>
    <dc:description>The decomposition rate of soil organic matter (SOM) is affected by soil management practices and particularly by the physical and hydraulic attributes of the soil. Previous studies have indicated that the SOM decomposition is influenced by the Least Limiting Water Range (LLWR). Therefore, the objective of this study was to relate the C-CO2 emissions to the LLWR of the surficial layer of soil under two management systems: no-tillage (NT), conducted for 20&#160;years, and conventional tillage (CT). Soil in NT presented greater soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks than in CT. Emissions of C-CO2 were greater in the NT than in the CT, because of the greater carbon stocks in the soil surface layer and the greater biological activity (due to the improvement of the soil structure) in NT as compared to CT. The use of LLWR associated with the measurement of C-CO2 emissions from the soil could help to predict the efficacy of the adopted management system for trapping carbon in the soil.</dc:description>
    <dc:subject>Carbon sequestration</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Soil management</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Soil organic matter</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Least limiting water range</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>04 agricultural and veterinary sciences</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>15. Life on land</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>01 natural sciences</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>6. Clean water</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>12. Responsible consumption</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>13. Climate action</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>0401 agriculture, forestry, and fisheries</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Field Scale</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Conservation tillage</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>0105 earth and related environmental sciences</dc:subject>
    <dc:creator rdf:resource="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1544-7310"/>
    <dc:creator rdf:resource="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4374-4056"/>
    <dc:creator rdf:resource="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5527-9748"/>
    <dc:creator rdf:resource="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9112-1339"/>
    <dc:creator>Medeiros, J. C., da Silva, A. P., Cerri, C. E. P., Giarola, N. F. B., Figueiredo, G. C., Fracetto, F. J. C., </dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-05-20</dc:date>
    <dc:type>journalpaper</dc:type>
    <dct:abstract>The decomposition rate of soil organic matter (SOM) is affected by soil management practices and particularly by the physical and hydraulic attributes of the soil. Previous studies have indicated that the SOM decomposition is influenced by the Least Limiting Water Range (LLWR). Therefore, the objective of this study was to relate the C-CO2 emissions to the LLWR of the surficial layer of soil under two management systems: no-tillage (NT), conducted for 20&#160;years, and conventional tillage (CT). Soil in NT presented greater soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks than in CT. Emissions of C-CO2 were greater in the NT than in the CT, because of the greater carbon stocks in the soil surface layer and the greater biological activity (due to the improvement of the soil structure) in NT as compared to CT. The use of LLWR associated with the measurement of C-CO2 emissions from the soil could help to predict the efficacy of the adopted management system for trapping carbon in the soil.</dct:abstract>
    <dc:title>Linking Physical Quality And Co2 Emissions Under Long-Term No-Till And Conventional-Till In A Subtropical Soil In Brazil</dc:title>
    <dc:identifier>10.1007/s11104-010-0420-4</dc:identifier>
    <dct:references>https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0420-4</dct:references>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>