IMPACT4SOIL OpenAire Crossref Microsoft Academic Graph Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment Closed Access 2017-02-17 Abstract Soil labile organic carbon pools are sensitive indicators of soil quality, early changes in soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks, and effects of different soil tillage practices. Impacts of atmospheric greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions on the global climate have encouraged the search for effective alternative methods to promote sustainable agriculture and mitigate climate change. We measured soil CO 2 emissions and dissolved organic carbon (DOC), easily oxidizable carbon (EOC), light fraction organic carbon (LFOC), particulate organic carbon (POC), and microbial biomass carbon (MBC) in maize ( Zea mays L.) fields treated with maize stover and a maize stover-derived biochar amendment during three consecutive maize growing seasons in a brown earth in Shenyang, China. We considered the following three treatments: CK (application of mineral NPK fertilizer; 120 kg N ha −1 , 60 kg P 2 O 5  ha −1 , and 60 kg K 2 O ha −1 ), ST (maize stover application; 7.5 t ha −1 ), and BC (7.5 t ha −1 of maize stover was charred, with a yield of 35% of the original biomass; 2.63 t ha −1 ). Both ST and BC treatments received the same fertilization as CK. Mean data of the three-year experiment indicated that the CO 2 emissions of ST and BC were significantly higher than CK by 129.7% and 24.4%, respectively. In both ST and BC treatments, SOC and labile organic C fractions were increased. The sensitivities of each labile organic C fraction varied with different treatments. Soil CO 2 emissions under biochar addition were significantly lower than that of stover incorporation. Overall, biochar application was a more effective practice based on the comprehensive consideration of improving soil quality and with regard to CO 2 mitigation in the experiment. 2. Zero hunger 13. Climate action 0401 agriculture, forestry, and fisheries 04 agricultural and veterinary sciences 15. Life on land 01 natural sciences 6. Clean water 12. Responsible consumption 0105 earth and related environmental sciences Xu Yang, Wenfu Chen, Yu Lan, Sainan Liu, Jie Han, Jun Meng, Tiexin Yang, Jun Yuan, 2017-03-01 journalpaper Abstract Soil labile organic carbon pools are sensitive indicators of soil quality, early changes in soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks, and effects of different soil tillage practices. Impacts of atmospheric greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions on the global climate have encouraged the search for effective alternative methods to promote sustainable agriculture and mitigate climate change. We measured soil CO 2 emissions and dissolved organic carbon (DOC), easily oxidizable carbon (EOC), light fraction organic carbon (LFOC), particulate organic carbon (POC), and microbial biomass carbon (MBC) in maize ( Zea mays L.) fields treated with maize stover and a maize stover-derived biochar amendment during three consecutive maize growing seasons in a brown earth in Shenyang, China. We considered the following three treatments: CK (application of mineral NPK fertilizer; 120 kg N ha −1 , 60 kg P 2 O 5  ha −1 , and 60 kg K 2 O ha −1 ), ST (maize stover application; 7.5 t ha −1 ), and BC (7.5 t ha −1 of maize stover was charred, with a yield of 35% of the original biomass; 2.63 t ha −1 ). Both ST and BC treatments received the same fertilization as CK. Mean data of the three-year experiment indicated that the CO 2 emissions of ST and BC were significantly higher than CK by 129.7% and 24.4%, respectively. In both ST and BC treatments, SOC and labile organic C fractions were increased. The sensitivities of each labile organic C fraction varied with different treatments. Soil CO 2 emissions under biochar addition were significantly lower than that of stover incorporation. Overall, biochar application was a more effective practice based on the comprehensive consideration of improving soil quality and with regard to CO 2 mitigation in the experiment. Effects Of Maize Stover And Its Biochar On Soil Co 2 Emissions And Labile Organic Carbon Fractions In Northeast China 10.1016/j.agee.2017.02.001 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.02.001