<rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2015.10.018">
    <dct:isReferencedBy>IMPACT4SOIL</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>OpenAire</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>Crossref</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>Microsoft Academic Graph</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isPartOf>CATENA</dct:isPartOf>
    <dct:license>Closed Access</dct:license>
    <dct:created>2015-10-26</dct:created>
    <dc:description>Abstract   Grazing exclusion is often implemented as an effective management practice to increase the sustainability of grassland ecosystems. However, it remains unclear if grazing exclusion can improve ecosystem services related to carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) sequestration in grassland ecosystems. We investigated the effects of 11&#160;years of grazing exclusion on plant biomass and diversity, soil properties (pH, soil water content (SWC), bulk density (BD), soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), and C/N ratio), and the C and N stocks of plants and soils in a desert grassland of Northwest China. Grazing exclusion improved plant aboveground biomass and diversity, as well as SWC, SOC, and TN contents, but lowered the belowground biomass, root/shoot ratio, pH, and BD. Moreover, grazing exclusion strongly influenced the C and N stocks of the ecosystem, and the annual mean ecosystem C and N sequestration rates were 0.47 and 0.09&#160;Mg&#160;ha &#8722;&#160;1 &#160;yr &#8722;&#160;1 , respectively, over 11&#160;years of grazing exclusion. Soil C stocks were most dynamic in the top 30&#160;cm of the soil, and N stocks mainly changed in the top 20&#160;cm after grazing exclusion. Our results indicated that grazing exclusion is an effective measurement on improving the ecosystem C and N pools in desert steppe of Northwest China.</dc:description>
    <dc:subject>SOIL ORGANIC C</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>0106 biological sciences</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Carbon Sequestration</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>550</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>MICROBIAL-COMMUNITY</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>SPATIAL VARIABILITY</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>PHYSICAL-PROPERTIES</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Soil Science</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>01 natural sciences</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Soil Prosperities</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>CENTRAL ARGENTINA</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>CARBON STORAGE</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>PLANT-COMMUNITIES</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Vegetation Characteristics</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>580</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>2. Zero hunger</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Science &amp; Technology</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Multidisciplinary</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>PRODUCTIVITY</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Nitrogen Sequestration</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Geology</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Agriculture</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>04 agricultural and veterinary sciences</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>15. Life on land</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>INNER-MONGOLIA</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Grazing</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>13. Climate action</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Physical Sciences</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Water Resources</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>0401 agriculture, forestry, and fisheries</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Fencing</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>LOESS PLATEAU CHINA</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Geosciences</dc:subject>
    <dc:creator rdf:resource="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5898-5100"/>
    <dc:creator rdf:resource="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3761-9950"/>
    <dc:creator>Wang, Kaibo, Deng, Lei, Ren, Zongping, Li, Jianping, Shangguan, Zhouping, </dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-02-01</dc:date>
    <dc:type>journalpaper</dc:type>
    <dct:abstract>Abstract   Grazing exclusion is often implemented as an effective management practice to increase the sustainability of grassland ecosystems. However, it remains unclear if grazing exclusion can improve ecosystem services related to carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) sequestration in grassland ecosystems. We investigated the effects of 11&#160;years of grazing exclusion on plant biomass and diversity, soil properties (pH, soil water content (SWC), bulk density (BD), soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), and C/N ratio), and the C and N stocks of plants and soils in a desert grassland of Northwest China. Grazing exclusion improved plant aboveground biomass and diversity, as well as SWC, SOC, and TN contents, but lowered the belowground biomass, root/shoot ratio, pH, and BD. Moreover, grazing exclusion strongly influenced the C and N stocks of the ecosystem, and the annual mean ecosystem C and N sequestration rates were 0.47 and 0.09&#160;Mg&#160;ha &#8722;&#160;1 &#160;yr &#8722;&#160;1 , respectively, over 11&#160;years of grazing exclusion. Soil C stocks were most dynamic in the top 30&#160;cm of the soil, and N stocks mainly changed in the top 20&#160;cm after grazing exclusion. Our results indicated that grazing exclusion is an effective measurement on improving the ecosystem C and N pools in desert steppe of Northwest China.</dct:abstract>
    <dc:title>Grazing Exclusion Significantly Improves Grassland Ecosystem C And N Pools In A Desert Steppe Of Northwest China</dc:title>
    <dc:identifier>10.1016/j.catena.2015.10.018</dc:identifier>
    <dct:references>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2015.10.018</dct:references>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>