<rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.005">
    <dct:isReferencedBy>IMPACT4SOIL</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>OpenAire</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>Crossref</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>Microsoft Academic Graph</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>Europe PubMed Central</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isPartOf>Science of The Total Environment</dct:isPartOf>
    <dct:license>Closed Access</dct:license>
    <dct:created>2015-04-18</dct:created>
    <dc:description>Field studies that have investigated the effects of char materials on the emission of nitrous oxide (N2O) are still scarce. Therefore, we conducted a field trial with bio- and hydrochars and measured N2O emissions for one whole year. It was hypothesised that the incorporation of chars reduces the emissions of N2O. Chars were produced by pyrolysis and hydrothermal carbonisation (HTC) using either maize silage or wood residues as feedstock. In addition, after production chars were post-treated with digestate in order to accelerate the ageing process of the chars. Chars and digestate were applied to the soil to raise the C content. Emissions of N2O were measured weekly and soil samples for inorganic nitrogen (N) and soil water-content were taken once a month. Additionally, the abundance of functional marker genes from denitrification (nosZ) was determined in October 2012 and in June 2013. The treatment with pure digestate emitted the most N2O compared to the control and char treatments. However, this was significant only in one case. There were no great differences between the char treatments due to high spatial variability and gene abundance of nosZ did not differ between treatments. Overall, emissions of N2O were relatively low. This was attributed to the heterogeneous distribution of the chars and the sandy soils that did not favour the production of N2O. To conclude, the emissions of N2O were mainly influenced by temperature and precipitation and to a minor extent by the type of char and post-treatment.</dc:description>
    <dc:subject>2. Zero hunger</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Air Pollutants</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Nitrous Oxide</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>04 agricultural and veterinary sciences</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>15. Life on land</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>16. Peace &amp; justice</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>01 natural sciences</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>6. Clean water</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Soil</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Biodegradation, Environmental</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>13. Climate action</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Charcoal</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Denitrification</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>0401 agriculture, forestry, and fisheries</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Environmental Monitoring</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>0105 earth and related environmental sciences</dc:subject>
    <dc:creator rdf:resource="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7797-5226"/>
    <dc:creator rdf:resource="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8235-0703"/>
    <dc:creator>Christiane Dicke, Janet Andert, Christian Ammon, J&#252;rgen Kern, Andreas Meyer-Aurich, Martin Kaupenjohann, </dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-08-01</dc:date>
    <dc:type>journalpaper</dc:type>
    <dct:abstract>Field studies that have investigated the effects of char materials on the emission of nitrous oxide (N2O) are still scarce. Therefore, we conducted a field trial with bio- and hydrochars and measured N2O emissions for one whole year. It was hypothesised that the incorporation of chars reduces the emissions of N2O. Chars were produced by pyrolysis and hydrothermal carbonisation (HTC) using either maize silage or wood residues as feedstock. In addition, after production chars were post-treated with digestate in order to accelerate the ageing process of the chars. Chars and digestate were applied to the soil to raise the C content. Emissions of N2O were measured weekly and soil samples for inorganic nitrogen (N) and soil water-content were taken once a month. Additionally, the abundance of functional marker genes from denitrification (nosZ) was determined in October 2012 and in June 2013. The treatment with pure digestate emitted the most N2O compared to the control and char treatments. However, this was significant only in one case. There were no great differences between the char treatments due to high spatial variability and gene abundance of nosZ did not differ between treatments. Overall, emissions of N2O were relatively low. This was attributed to the heterogeneous distribution of the chars and the sandy soils that did not favour the production of N2O. To conclude, the emissions of N2O were mainly influenced by temperature and precipitation and to a minor extent by the type of char and post-treatment.</dct:abstract>
    <dc:title>Effects Of Different Biochars And Digestate On N2o Fluxes Under Field Conditions</dc:title>
    <dc:identifier>10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.005</dc:identifier>
    <dct:references>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.005</dct:references>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>