<rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0313">
    <dct:isReferencedBy>IMPACT4SOIL</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>OpenAire</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>UnpayWall</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>Crossref</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>Microsoft Academic Graph</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>Europe PubMed Central</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isPartOf>Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences</dct:isPartOf>
    <dct:license>Open Access</dct:license>
    <dct:created>2012-03-26</dct:created>
    <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;             In earlier work, we compared the amount of newly fixed nitrogen (N, as synthetic fertilizer and biologically fixed N) entering agricultural systems globally to the total emission of nitrous oxide (N             2             O). We obtained an N             2             O emission factor (EF) of 3&#65506;&#65408;&#65427;5%, and applied it to biofuel production. For &#65506;&#65408;&#65432;first-generation&#65506;&#65408;&#65433; biofuels, e.g. biodiesel from rapeseed and bioethanol from corn (maize), that require N fertilizer, N             2             O from biofuel production could cause (depending on N uptake efficiency) as much or more global warming as that avoided by replacement of fossil fuel by the biofuel. Our subsequent calculations in a follow-up paper, using published life cycle analysis (LCA) models, led to broadly similar conclusions. The N             2             O EF applies to agricultural crops in general, not just to biofuel crops, and has made possible a top-down estimate of global emissions from agriculture. Independent modelling by another group using bottom-up IPCC inventory methodology has shown good agreement at the global scale with our top-down estimate. Work by Davidson showed that the rate of accumulation of N             2             O in the atmosphere in the late nineteenth and twentieth centuries was greater than that predicted from agricultural inputs limited to fertilizer N and biologically fixed N (Davidson, E. A. 2009             Nat. Geosci             .             2             , 659&#65506;&#65408;&#65427;662.). However, by also including soil organic N mineralized following land-use change and NO                            x                          deposited from the atmosphere in our estimates of the reactive N entering the agricultural cycle, we have now obtained a good fit between the observed atmospheric N             2             O concentrations from 1860 to 2000 and those calculated on the basis of a 4 per cent EF for the reactive N.           &lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
    <dc:subject>2. Zero hunger</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Air Pollutants</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>330</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Climate</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Nitrous Oxide</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Agriculture</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>15. Life on land</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Nitrification</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>01 natural sciences</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>7. Clean energy</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>630</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Soil</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>13. Climate action</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Biofuels</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Denitrification</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>0105 earth and related environmental sciences</dc:subject>
    <dc:creator rdf:resource="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7131-1496"/>
    <dc:creator>Wilfried Winiwarter, Wilfried Winiwarter, Keith Smith, Paul J. Crutzen, Arvin R. Mosier, </dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-05</dc:date>
    <dc:type>journalpaper</dc:type>
    <dct:abstract>&lt;p&gt;             In earlier work, we compared the amount of newly fixed nitrogen (N, as synthetic fertilizer and biologically fixed N) entering agricultural systems globally to the total emission of nitrous oxide (N             2             O). We obtained an N             2             O emission factor (EF) of 3&#65506;&#65408;&#65427;5%, and applied it to biofuel production. For &#65506;&#65408;&#65432;first-generation&#65506;&#65408;&#65433; biofuels, e.g. biodiesel from rapeseed and bioethanol from corn (maize), that require N fertilizer, N             2             O from biofuel production could cause (depending on N uptake efficiency) as much or more global warming as that avoided by replacement of fossil fuel by the biofuel. Our subsequent calculations in a follow-up paper, using published life cycle analysis (LCA) models, led to broadly similar conclusions. The N             2             O EF applies to agricultural crops in general, not just to biofuel crops, and has made possible a top-down estimate of global emissions from agriculture. Independent modelling by another group using bottom-up IPCC inventory methodology has shown good agreement at the global scale with our top-down estimate. Work by Davidson showed that the rate of accumulation of N             2             O in the atmosphere in the late nineteenth and twentieth centuries was greater than that predicted from agricultural inputs limited to fertilizer N and biologically fixed N (Davidson, E. A. 2009             Nat. Geosci             .             2             , 659&#65506;&#65408;&#65427;662.). However, by also including soil organic N mineralized following land-use change and NO                            x                          deposited from the atmosphere in our estimates of the reactive N entering the agricultural cycle, we have now obtained a good fit between the observed atmospheric N             2             O concentrations from 1860 to 2000 and those calculated on the basis of a 4 per cent EF for the reactive N.           &lt;/p&gt;</dct:abstract>
    <dc:title>The Role Of N2o Derived From Crop-Based Biofuels, And From Agriculture In General, In Earth'S Climate</dc:title>
    <dc:identifier>10.1098/rstb.2011.0313</dc:identifier>
    <dct:references>https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0313</dct:references>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>