<rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14644">
    <dct:isReferencedBy>IMPACT4SOIL</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>OpenAire</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>UnpayWall</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>Crossref</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>Microsoft Academic Graph</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>Europe PubMed Central</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>PubMed Central</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isPartOf>Global Change Biology</dct:isPartOf>
    <dct:license>Open Access</dct:license>
    <dct:created>2019-04-07</dct:created>
    <dc:description>Abstract&lt;p&gt;Cover crops play an increasingly important role in improving soil quality, reducing agricultural inputs and improving environmental sustainability. The main objectives of this critical global review and systematic analysis were to assess cover crop practices in the context of their impacts on nitrogen leaching, net greenhouse gas balances (NGHGB) and crop productivity. Only studies that investigated the impacts of cover crops and measured one or a combination of nitrogen leaching, soil organic carbon (SOC), nitrous oxide (N2O), grain yield and nitrogen in grain of primary crop, and had a control treatment were included in the analysis. Long&#65506;&#65408;&#65424;term studies were uncommon, with most data coming from studies lasting 2&#65506;&#65408;&#65427;3&#65474;&#65440;years. The literature search resulted in 106 studies carried out at 372 sites and covering different countries, climatic zones and management. Our analysis demonstrates that cover crops significantly (p&#65474;&#65440;&amp;lt;&#65474;&#65440;0.001) decreased N leaching and significantly (p&#65474;&#65440;&amp;lt;&#65474;&#65440;0.001) increased SOC sequestration without having significant (p&#65474;&#65440;&amp;gt;&#65474;&#65440;0.05) effects on direct N2O emissions. Cover crops could mitigate the NGHGB by 2.06&#65474;&#65440;&#65474;&#65457;&#65474;&#65440;2.10&#65474;&#65440;Mg CO2&#65506;&#65408;&#65424;eq&#65474;&#65440;ha&#65506;&#65416;&#65426;1&#65474;&#65440;year&#65506;&#65416;&#65426;1. One of the potential disadvantages of cover crops identified was the reduction in grain yield of the primary crop by &#65506;&#65417;&#65416;4%, compared to the control treatment. This drawback could be avoided by selecting mixed cover crops with a range of legumes and non&#65506;&#65408;&#65424;legumes, which increased the yield by &#65506;&#65417;&#65416;13%. These advantages of cover crops justify their widespread adoption. However, management practices in relation to cover crops will need to be adapted to specific soil, management and regional climatic conditions.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
    <dc:subject>Crops, Agricultural</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>net greenhouse gas balance</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>330</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Supplementary Data</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Nitrogen</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>QH301 Biology</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Supplementary data available</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>12. Responsible consumption</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Nitrous oxide emissions</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>QH301</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Greenhouse Gases</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Soil</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>N content</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>nitrate</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>C sequestration</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>N leaching</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Environmental Chemistry</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>General Environmental Science</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>NE/M019691/1</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>2. Zero hunger</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Global and Planetary Change</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Catch crop</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Ecology</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Soil organic carbon</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>green manure</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Research Review</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Agriculture</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>04 agricultural and veterinary sciences</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>15. Life on land</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>yield</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Crop Production</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>13. Climate action</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>N in grain</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Cover crop</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>0401 agriculture, forestry, and fisheries</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>BB/N013484/1</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>BB/N013468/1</dc:subject>
    <dc:creator rdf:resource="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8403-327x"/>
    <dc:creator rdf:resource="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9863-7613"/>
    <dc:creator rdf:resource="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6101-0558"/>
    <dc:creator rdf:resource="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0469-6394"/>
    <dc:creator rdf:resource="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1348-8693"/>
    <dc:creator rdf:resource="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3784-1124"/>
    <dc:creator>Mohamed Abdalla, Astley Hastings, Kun Cheng, Qian Yue, Dave Chadwick, Mikk Espenberg, Jaak Truu, Robert M. Rees, Pete Smith, </dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-05-13</dc:date>
    <dc:type>journalpaper</dc:type>
    <dct:abstract>Abstract&lt;p&gt;Cover crops play an increasingly important role in improving soil quality, reducing agricultural inputs and improving environmental sustainability. The main objectives of this critical global review and systematic analysis were to assess cover crop practices in the context of their impacts on nitrogen leaching, net greenhouse gas balances (NGHGB) and crop productivity. Only studies that investigated the impacts of cover crops and measured one or a combination of nitrogen leaching, soil organic carbon (SOC), nitrous oxide (N2O), grain yield and nitrogen in grain of primary crop, and had a control treatment were included in the analysis. Long&#65506;&#65408;&#65424;term studies were uncommon, with most data coming from studies lasting 2&#65506;&#65408;&#65427;3&#65474;&#65440;years. The literature search resulted in 106 studies carried out at 372 sites and covering different countries, climatic zones and management. Our analysis demonstrates that cover crops significantly (p&#65474;&#65440;&amp;lt;&#65474;&#65440;0.001) decreased N leaching and significantly (p&#65474;&#65440;&amp;lt;&#65474;&#65440;0.001) increased SOC sequestration without having significant (p&#65474;&#65440;&amp;gt;&#65474;&#65440;0.05) effects on direct N2O emissions. Cover crops could mitigate the NGHGB by 2.06&#65474;&#65440;&#65474;&#65457;&#65474;&#65440;2.10&#65474;&#65440;Mg CO2&#65506;&#65408;&#65424;eq&#65474;&#65440;ha&#65506;&#65416;&#65426;1&#65474;&#65440;year&#65506;&#65416;&#65426;1. One of the potential disadvantages of cover crops identified was the reduction in grain yield of the primary crop by &#65506;&#65417;&#65416;4%, compared to the control treatment. This drawback could be avoided by selecting mixed cover crops with a range of legumes and non&#65506;&#65408;&#65424;legumes, which increased the yield by &#65506;&#65417;&#65416;13%. These advantages of cover crops justify their widespread adoption. However, management practices in relation to cover crops will need to be adapted to specific soil, management and regional climatic conditions.&lt;/p&gt;</dct:abstract>
    <dc:title>A critical review of the impacts of cover crops on nitrogen leaching, net greenhouse gas balance and crop productivity</dc:title>
    <dc:identifier>10.1111/gcb.14644</dc:identifier>
    <dct:references>https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14644</dct:references>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>