<rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcat="http://www.w3.org/ns/dcat#" xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202301.0161.v1">
    <dct:isReferencedBy>OPENAIRE</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>OpenAire</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>Sygma</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTA</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>Preprints.org</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>DOAJ</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>DIGITAL.CSIC</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>Crossref</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>European Union Open Data Portal</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:references>http://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/2/431/pdf</dct:references>
    <dct:references>https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/2/431/pdf</dct:references>
    <dct:references>https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202301.0161.v1</dct:references>
    <dcat:downloadURL rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/2/431/pdf"/>
    <dcat:downloadURL rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/2/431/pdf"/>
    <dct:isPartOf>Land</dct:isPartOf>
    <dct:license>Open Access</dct:license>
    <dct:created>2023-01-10</dct:created>
    <dct:created>2023-02-08</dct:created>
    <dct:available>2023-01-09</dct:available>
    <dc:description>&lt;?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?&gt;&lt;article&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the Czech Republic, the Universal Soil Loss Equation provides the basis for defining the soil protection strategy. Field rainfall simulators were used to define the actual cover-management factor values of the most extensively seeded crops in the Czech Republic. More than 380 simulations between 2016 and 2021 provided data. The methodology focused on multi-seasonal measurements to cover the most important phenological phases. A comparison with the original USDA values for maize showed that it is desirable to redefine the C-factor. 71 fallow plot experiments showed that the rainfall-runoff relation is much easier to replicate than the actual sediment transport. For 30-minute intensive rainfall, the runoff ratio reached 62%, and the coefficient of variation was 25%. On saturated soil, the runoff ratio reached 81% and the coefficient of variation dropped to 12%. Soil protection techniques have a significant effect on runoff reduction. Maize seeded after cover crops and combined with reduced tillage or direct seeding can reduce the runoff ratio to 10-20% for &amp;amp;lsquo;dry&amp;amp;rsquo; conditions and to 12-40% for &amp;amp;lsquo;saturated&amp;amp;rsquo; conditions. Concerning soil loss, the variations are greater, with the coefficient of variation reaching 42% during fallow plot experiments. The reader should consider associated uncertainties.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/article&gt;</dc:description>
    <dc:subject>environmental_sciences</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>2. Zero hunger</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>soil erosion</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>S</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Cover crops</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Soil protection</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Rainfall simulator</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Soil loss ratio</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Agriculture</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>04 agricultural and veterinary sciences</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>15. Life on land</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>rainfall simulator</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>C-factor</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>6. Clean water</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>soil protection</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Soil erosion</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>0401 agriculture, forestry, and fisheries</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>USLE</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>soil loss ratio</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>cover crops</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>runoff coefficient</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Runoff coefficient</dc:subject>
    <dc:creator rdf:resource="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9313-8946"/>
    <dc:creator rdf:resource="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4067-5806"/>
    <dc:creator rdf:resource="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3984-3462"/>
    <dc:creator>Jakub Sta&#353;ek, Josef Kr&#225;sa, Martin Mistr, Tom&#225;&#353; Dost&#225;l, Jan Dev&#225;t&#253;, Tom&#225;&#353; St&#345;eda, Jan Mikulka, </dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-01-09</dc:date>
    <dc:type>journalpaper</dc:type>
    <dct:abstract>&lt;?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?&gt;&lt;article&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the Czech Republic, the Universal Soil Loss Equation provides the basis for defining the soil protection strategy. Field rainfall simulators were used to define the actual cover-management factor values of the most extensively seeded crops in the Czech Republic. More than 380 simulations between 2016 and 2021 provided data. The methodology focused on multi-seasonal measurements to cover the most important phenological phases. A comparison with the original USDA values for maize showed that it is desirable to redefine the C-factor. 71 fallow plot experiments showed that the rainfall-runoff relation is much easier to replicate than the actual sediment transport. For 30-minute intensive rainfall, the runoff ratio reached 62%, and the coefficient of variation was 25%. On saturated soil, the runoff ratio reached 81% and the coefficient of variation dropped to 12%. Soil protection techniques have a significant effect on runoff reduction. Maize seeded after cover crops and combined with reduced tillage or direct seeding can reduce the runoff ratio to 10-20% for &amp;amp;lsquo;dry&amp;amp;rsquo; conditions and to 12-40% for &amp;amp;lsquo;saturated&amp;amp;rsquo; conditions. Concerning soil loss, the variations are greater, with the coefficient of variation reaching 42% during fallow plot experiments. The reader should consider associated uncertainties.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/article&gt;</dct:abstract>
    <dc:title>Using a Rainfall Simulator to Define the Effect of Soil Conservation Techniques on Soil Loss and Water Retention</dc:title>
    <dc:identifier>10.20944/preprints202301.0161.v1</dc:identifier>
    <dct:relation>101000224</dct:relation>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>