<rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://doi.org/10.7941/D1432P">
    <dct:isReferencedBy>IMPACT4SOIL</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>OpenAire</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:isReferencedBy>Datacite</dct:isReferencedBy>
    <dct:license>unspecified</dct:license>
    <dct:available>2022-03-31</dct:available>
    <dc:description>unspecifiedAims: High-resolution information on soils&#8217; vulnerability to  climate-induced soil organic carbon (SOC) loss can enable environmental  scientists, land managers, and policy makers to develop targeted  mitigation strategies. This study aims to estimate baseline and decadal  changes in continental US surface SOC stocks under future emission  scenarios. &#160; Location: Continental United States &#160; Time  Period: 2014-2100 &#160; Results: Baseline SOC projections from ML  approaches captured more than 50% of variability in SOC observations,  whereas ESMs represented only 6-16% of observed SOC variability. ML  estimates showed a mean total loss of 1.8 Pg C from US surface soils under  the high-emission scenario by 2100, whereas ESMs showed no significant  change in SOC stocks with wide variation among ESMs. Both ML and ESM  predictions agree on the direction of SOC change (net emissions or  sequestration) across 46%&#8211;51% of continental US land area. These  differences are attributable to the high-resolution site-specific data  used in ML model compared to the relatively coarse grid represented in  CMIP6 ESMs. &#160; Main conclusions: Our high-resolution estimates of  baseline SOC stocks, identification of key environmental controllers, and  projection of SOC changes from US land cover types under future climate  scenarios suggest the need for high-resolution simulations of SOC in ESMs  to represent the heterogeneity of SOC. We found that the SOC change is  sensitive to key soil related factors (e.g. soil drainage and soil order)  that have not been historically considered as input parameters in ESMs,  because currently more than 95% variability in the SOC of CMIP6 ESMs are  controlled by net primary productivity, temperature, and precipitation.  Using additional environmental factors to estimate the baseline SOC stocks  and predict the future trajectory of SOC change can provide more accurate  results. </dc:description>
    <dc:description>unspecifiedAims: High-resolution information on soils&#8217; vulnerability to  climate-induced soil organic carbon (SOC) loss can enable environmental  scientists, land managers, and policy makers to develop targeted  mitigation strategies. This study aims to estimate baseline and decadal  changes in continental US surface SOC stocks under future emission  scenarios. &#160; Location: Continental United States &#160; Time  Period: 2014-2100 &#160; Results: Baseline SOC projections from ML  approaches captured more than 50% of variability in SOC observations,  whereas ESMs represented only 6-16% of observed SOC variability. ML  estimates showed a mean total loss of 1.8 Pg C from US surface soils under  the high-emission scenario by 2100, whereas ESMs showed no significant  change in SOC stocks with wide variation among ESMs. Both ML and ESM  predictions agree on the direction of SOC change (net emissions or  sequestration) across 46%&#8211;51% of continental US land area. These  differences are attributable to the high-resolution site-specific data  used in ML model compared to the relatively coarse grid represented in  CMIP6 ESMs. &#160; Main conclusions: Our high-resolution estimates of  baseline SOC stocks, identification of key environmental controllers, and  projection of SOC changes from US land cover types under future climate  scenarios suggest the need for high-resolution simulations of SOC in ESMs  to represent the heterogeneity of SOC. We found that the SOC change is  sensitive to key soil related factors (e.g. soil drainage and soil order)  that have not been historically considered as input parameters in ESMs,  because currently more than 95% variability in the SOC of CMIP6 ESMs are  controlled by net primary productivity, temperature, and precipitation.  Using additional environmental factors to estimate the baseline SOC stocks  and predict the future trajectory of SOC change can provide more accurate  results. We used recent SOC field observations (n = 6,213 sites),  environmental factors (n = 32), and an ensemble machine learning (ML)  approach to estimate baseline SOC stocks in surface soils across the  continental United States at 100-m spatial resolution, and decadal changes  under the projected climate scenarios of Coupled Model Intercomparison  Project Phase Six (CMIP6) Earth System Models (ESMs). </dc:description>
    <dc:subject>soil organic carbon</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>earth system model</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>13. Climate action</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>environmental factors</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>future projection</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>FOS: Earth and related environmental sciences</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>15. Life on land</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>climate</dc:subject>
    <dc:creator>Gautam, Sagar</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-03-31</dc:date>
    <dct:abstract>unspecifiedAims: High-resolution information on soils&#8217; vulnerability to  climate-induced soil organic carbon (SOC) loss can enable environmental  scientists, land managers, and policy makers to develop targeted  mitigation strategies. This study aims to estimate baseline and decadal  changes in continental US surface SOC stocks under future emission  scenarios. &#160; Location: Continental United States &#160; Time  Period: 2014-2100 &#160; Results: Baseline SOC projections from ML  approaches captured more than 50% of variability in SOC observations,  whereas ESMs represented only 6-16% of observed SOC variability. ML  estimates showed a mean total loss of 1.8 Pg C from US surface soils under  the high-emission scenario by 2100, whereas ESMs showed no significant  change in SOC stocks with wide variation among ESMs. Both ML and ESM  predictions agree on the direction of SOC change (net emissions or  sequestration) across 46%&#8211;51% of continental US land area. These  differences are attributable to the high-resolution site-specific data  used in ML model compared to the relatively coarse grid represented in  CMIP6 ESMs. &#160; Main conclusions: Our high-resolution estimates of  baseline SOC stocks, identification of key environmental controllers, and  projection of SOC changes from US land cover types under future climate  scenarios suggest the need for high-resolution simulations of SOC in ESMs  to represent the heterogeneity of SOC. We found that the SOC change is  sensitive to key soil related factors (e.g. soil drainage and soil order)  that have not been historically considered as input parameters in ESMs,  because currently more than 95% variability in the SOC of CMIP6 ESMs are  controlled by net primary productivity, temperature, and precipitation.  Using additional environmental factors to estimate the baseline SOC stocks  and predict the future trajectory of SOC change can provide more accurate  results. </dct:abstract>
    <dct:abstract>unspecifiedAims: High-resolution information on soils&#8217; vulnerability to  climate-induced soil organic carbon (SOC) loss can enable environmental  scientists, land managers, and policy makers to develop targeted  mitigation strategies. This study aims to estimate baseline and decadal  changes in continental US surface SOC stocks under future emission  scenarios. &#160; Location: Continental United States &#160; Time  Period: 2014-2100 &#160; Results: Baseline SOC projections from ML  approaches captured more than 50% of variability in SOC observations,  whereas ESMs represented only 6-16% of observed SOC variability. ML  estimates showed a mean total loss of 1.8 Pg C from US surface soils under  the high-emission scenario by 2100, whereas ESMs showed no significant  change in SOC stocks with wide variation among ESMs. Both ML and ESM  predictions agree on the direction of SOC change (net emissions or  sequestration) across 46%&#8211;51% of continental US land area. These  differences are attributable to the high-resolution site-specific data  used in ML model compared to the relatively coarse grid represented in  CMIP6 ESMs. &#160; Main conclusions: Our high-resolution estimates of  baseline SOC stocks, identification of key environmental controllers, and  projection of SOC changes from US land cover types under future climate  scenarios suggest the need for high-resolution simulations of SOC in ESMs  to represent the heterogeneity of SOC. We found that the SOC change is  sensitive to key soil related factors (e.g. soil drainage and soil order)  that have not been historically considered as input parameters in ESMs,  because currently more than 95% variability in the SOC of CMIP6 ESMs are  controlled by net primary productivity, temperature, and precipitation.  Using additional environmental factors to estimate the baseline SOC stocks  and predict the future trajectory of SOC change can provide more accurate  results. We used recent SOC field observations (n = 6,213 sites),  environmental factors (n = 32), and an ensemble machine learning (ML)  approach to estimate baseline SOC stocks in surface soils across the  continental United States at 100-m spatial resolution, and decadal changes  under the projected climate scenarios of Coupled Model Intercomparison  Project Phase Six (CMIP6) Earth System Models (ESMs). </dct:abstract>
    <dc:title>Continental United States may lose 1.8 petagrams of soil organic carbon under climate change by 2100</dc:title>
    <dc:identifier>10.7941/D1432P</dc:identifier>
    <dc:type>dataset</dc:type>
    <dct:references>https://doi.org/10.7941/D1432P</dct:references>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>