{"type": "FeatureCollection", "features": [{"id": "10.5281/zenodo.5226666", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-07-25T16:23:30Z", "type": "Dataset", "title": "SOILCARE_database1_WP2_SICS_aspects", "description": "Open Access{'references': ['Oenema, O., M. Heinen, R. Rietra, and R. Hessel. 2017. A review of soil-improving cropping systems (full report). SoilCare Scientific Report 07, Deliverable D2.1, SoilCare Project, Wageningen Environmental Research, the Netherlands. Available at: https://soilcare-project.eu/downloads/soilcare-reports-and-deliverables']}", "keywords": ["2. Zero hunger", "Soil improving cropping systems", "Literature review of published meta-analysis studies", "13. Climate action", "15. Life on land", "6. Clean water"], "contacts": [{"organization": "Heinen, Marius, Rietra, Ren\ufffd\ufffd, Oenema, Oene,", "roles": ["creator"]}]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5226666"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.5281/zenodo.5226666", "name": "item", "description": "10.5281/zenodo.5226666", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.5281/zenodo.5226666"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2021-01-01T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.1016/j.agee.2018.05.028", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-07-25T16:15:40Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2018-05-31", "title": "Effects of agricultural management practices on soil quality: A review of long-term experiments for Europe and China", "description": "Open AccessIn this paper we present effects of four paired agricultural management practices (organic matter (OM) addition versus no organic matter input, no-tillage (NT) versus conventional tillage, crop rotation versus monoculture, and organic agriculture versus conventional agriculture) on five key soil quality indicators, i.e., soil organic matter (SOM) content, pH, aggregate stability, earthworms (numbers) and crop yield. We have considered organic matter addition, no-tillage, crop rotation and organic agriculture as 'promising practices'; no organic matter input, conventional tillage, monoculture and conventional farming were taken as the respective references or 'standard practice' (baseline). Relative effects were analysed through indicator response ratio (RR) under each paired practice. For this we considered data of 30 long-term experiments collected from 13 case study sites in Europe and China as collated in the framework of the EU-China funded iSQAPER project. These were complemented with data from 42 long-term experiments across China and 402 observations of long-term trials published in the literature. Out of these, we only considered experiments covering at least five years. The results show that OM addition favourably affected all the indicators under consideration. The most favourable effect was reported on earthworm numbers, followed by yield, SOM content and soil aggregate stability. For pH, effects depended on soil type; OM input favourably affected the pH of acidic soils, whereas no clear trend was observed under NT. NT generally led to increased aggregate stability and greater SOM content in upper soil horizons. However, the magnitude of the relative effects varied, e.g. with soil texture. No-tillage practices enhanced earthworm populations, but not where herbicides or pesticides were applied to combat weeds and pests. Overall, in this review, yield slightly decreased under NT. Crop rotation had a positive effect on SOM content and yield; rotation with ley very positively influenced earthworms' numbers. Overall, crop rotation had little impact on soil pH and aggregate stability \u2212 depending on the type of intercrop; alternatively, rotation of arable crops only resulted in adverse effects. A clear positive trend was observed for earthworm abundance under organic agriculture. Further, organic agriculture generally resulted in increased aggregate stability and greater SOM content. Overall, no clear trend was found for pH; a decrease in yield was observed under organic agriculture in this review.", "keywords": ["China", "Soil Science", "Organic chemistry", "Crop", "01 natural sciences", "Long-term field experiments", "Crop Productivity", "Soil quality", "Environmental science", "Organic Matter Dynamics", "Tillage", "Agricultural and Biological Sciences", "Soil quality indicators", "Crop rotation", "Management of Soil Fertility and Crop Productivity", "Soil water", "FOS: Mathematics", "Agricultural management practices", "Monoculture", "Crop Yield Stability", "Biology", "0105 earth and related environmental sciences", "Literature review", "Response ratio", "Soil science", "2. Zero hunger", "Soil organic matter", "Soil Fertility", "Conventional tillage", "Geography", "Life Sciences", "Agriculture", "04 agricultural and veterinary sciences", "Soil Nutrient Management", "15. Life on land", "Agronomy", "Europe", "Chemistry", "Archaeology", "13. Climate action", "0401 agriculture", " forestry", " and fisheries", "Crop husbandry", "Organic matter", "Intercropping in Agricultural Systems", "Soil Carbon Dynamics and Nutrient Cycling in Ecosystems", "Agronomy and Crop Science", "Mathematics"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.05.028"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Agriculture%2C%20Ecosystems%20%26amp%3B%20Environment", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.1016/j.agee.2018.05.028", "name": "item", "description": "10.1016/j.agee.2018.05.028", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.1016/j.agee.2018.05.028"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2018-10-01T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.5281/zenodo.5226665", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-07-25T16:23:30Z", "type": "Dataset", "title": "SOILCARE_database1_WP2_SICS_aspects", "description": "Open Access{'references': ['Oenema, O., M. Heinen, R. Rietra, and R. Hessel. 2017. A review of soil-improving cropping systems (full report). SoilCare Scientific Report 07, Deliverable D2.1, SoilCare Project, Wageningen Environmental Research, the Netherlands. Available at: https://soilcare-project.eu/downloads/soilcare-reports-and-deliverables']}", "keywords": ["2. Zero hunger", "Soil improving cropping systems", "Literature review of published meta-analysis studies", "13. Climate action", "15. Life on land", "6. Clean water"], "contacts": [{"organization": "Heinen, Marius, Rietra, Ren\ufffd\ufffd, Oenema, Oene,", "roles": ["creator"]}]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5226665"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.5281/zenodo.5226665", "name": "item", "description": "10.5281/zenodo.5226665", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.5281/zenodo.5226665"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2021-01-01T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.18167/DVN1/KKPLR8", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-07-25T16:19:58Z", "type": "Dataset", "title": "A global database of land management, land-use change and climate change effects on soil organic carbon", "description": "This dataset comprises data from a systematic review done after a comprehensive literature search using Scopus, Web of Science, Ovid publisher and Google Scholar for peer-reviewed meta-analyses and systematic reviews up to early 2020 that reported on soil organic carbon. This global database compiles the results of 13,632 primary studies from 217 meta-analyses, and more than 100 000 paired comparisons. We report a total of 15,983 effect sizes, 6,541 of them related to SOC, and 9,442 of them related to other associated soil, plant or atmosphere parameters. Each effect-size is precisely described, including measures of heterogeneity, precise type of intervention and outcome associated to ease its interpretation. We also provide a precise assessment of the quality of the meta-analyses. Finally, we also document the geographic origin of the primary studies. Our database represents, to our knowledge the widest and most rigorous analysis of available data on the subject. This database can help understanding drivers of SOC sequestration, associated co-benefits and possible drawbacks, as well as guiding future global climate policies. It can provide robust guidance to ongoing debated and serve as a basis in international panels such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).", "keywords": ["meta-analysis", "soil organic carbon", "systematic review", "13. Climate action", "Agricultural Sciences", "literature reviews", "Agriculture in general", "food security", "15. Life on land", "carbon sequestration", "climate change adaptation", "climate change mitigation"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10.18167/DVN1/KKPLR8"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.18167/DVN1/KKPLR8", "name": "item", "description": "10.18167/DVN1/KKPLR8", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.18167/DVN1/KKPLR8"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2021-01-01T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.5194/bg-19-3505-2022", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-07-25T16:21:43Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2022-07-28", "title": "Reviews and syntheses: The promise of big diverse soil data, moving current practices towards future potential", "description": "<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><article><p>Abstract. In the age of big data, soil data are more available and richer than ever, but \u2013 outside of a few large soil survey resources \u2013 they remain largely unusable for informing soil management and understanding Earth system processes beyond the original study. Data science has promised a fully reusable research pipeline where data from past studies are used to contextualize new findings and reanalyzed for new insight. Yet synthesis projects encounter challenges at all steps of the data reuse pipeline, including unavailable data, labor-intensive transcription of datasets, incomplete metadata, and a lack of communication between collaborators. Here, using insights from a diversity of soil, data, and climate scientists, we summarize current practices in soil data synthesis across all stages of database creation: availability, input, harmonization, curation, and publication. We then suggest new soil-focused semantic tools to improve existing data pipelines, such as ontologies, vocabulary lists, and community practices. Our goal is to provide the soil data community with an overview of current practices in soil data and where we need to go to fully leverage big data to solve soil problems in the next century.                     </p></article>", "keywords": ["FOS: Computer and information sciences", "0301 basic medicine", "Data Sharing", "Information Systems and Management", "literature review", "1904 Earth-Surface Processes", "Social Sciences", "data set", "01 natural sciences", "Decision Sciences", "Data science", "Life", "QH501-531", "910 Geography & travel", "soil analysis", "database", "QH540-549.5", "2. Zero hunger", "QE1-996.5", "000", "Ecology", "communication", "Physics", "Earth", "Geology", "[SDU.ENVI] Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Continental interfaces", " environment", "World Wide Web", "10122 Institute of Geography", "soil survey", "Physical Sciences", "Data Reuse", "environment", "Information Systems", "Evolution", "future prospect", "Data management", "Data Sharing and Stewardship in Science", "Database", "Big data", "03 medical and health sciences", "Behavior and Systematics", "Data mining", "0105 earth and related environmental sciences", "[SDU.OCEAN]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Ocean", "Management and Reproducibility of Scientific Workflows", "Metadata", "Data curation", "Atmosphere", "[SDU.OCEAN] Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Ocean", " Atmosphere", "Acoustics", "15. Life on land", "Computer science", "1105 Ecology", " Evolution", " Behavior and Systematics", "Surface Processes", "Harmonization", "FOS: Biological sciences", "Computer Science", "Environmental Science", "[SDU.ENVI]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Continental interfaces", "soil management", "Research Data", "Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Monitoring"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-3505-2022"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Biogeosciences", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.5194/bg-19-3505-2022", "name": "item", "description": "10.5194/bg-19-3505-2022", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.5194/bg-19-3505-2022"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2022-07-28T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.60692/wzwcw-szh03", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-07-25T16:24:18Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2018-05-30", "title": "Effects of agricultural management practices on soil quality: A review of long-term experiments for Europe and China", "description": "Open AccessIn this paper we present effects of four paired agricultural management practices (organic matter (OM) addition versus no organic matter input, no-tillage (NT) versus conventional tillage, crop rotation versus monoculture, and organic agriculture versus conventional agriculture) on five key soil quality indicators, i.e., soil organic matter (SOM) content, pH, aggregate stability, earthworms (numbers) and crop yield. We have considered organic matter addition, no-tillage, crop rotation and organic agriculture as 'promising practices'; no organic matter input, conventional tillage, monoculture and conventional farming were taken as the respective references or 'standard practice' (baseline). Relative effects were analysed through indicator response ratio (RR) under each paired practice. For this we considered data of 30 long-term experiments collected from 13 case study sites in Europe and China as collated in the framework of the EU-China funded iSQAPER project. These were complemented with data from 42 long-term experiments across China and 402 observations of long-term trials published in the literature. Out of these, we only considered experiments covering at least five years. The results show that OM addition favourably affected all the indicators under consideration. The most favourable effect was reported on earthworm numbers, followed by yield, SOM content and soil aggregate stability. For pH, effects depended on soil type; OM input favourably affected the pH of acidic soils, whereas no clear trend was observed under NT. NT generally led to increased aggregate stability and greater SOM content in upper soil horizons. However, the magnitude of the relative effects varied, e.g. with soil texture. No-tillage practices enhanced earthworm populations, but not where herbicides or pesticides were applied to combat weeds and pests. Overall, in this review, yield slightly decreased under NT. Crop rotation had a positive effect on SOM content and yield; rotation with ley very positively influenced earthworms' numbers. Overall, crop rotation had little impact on soil pH and aggregate stability \u2212 depending on the type of intercrop; alternatively, rotation of arable crops only resulted in adverse effects. A clear positive trend was observed for earthworm abundance under organic agriculture. Further, organic agriculture generally resulted in increased aggregate stability and greater SOM content. Overall, no clear trend was found for pH; a decrease in yield was observed under organic agriculture in this review.", "keywords": ["Soil Science", "Organic chemistry", "Crop", "01 natural sciences", "Long-term field experiments", "Crop Productivity", "Soil quality", "Environmental science", "Organic Matter Dynamics", "Tillage", "Agricultural and Biological Sciences", "Soil quality indicators", "Crop rotation", "Management of Soil Fertility and Crop Productivity", "Soil water", "FOS: Mathematics", "Agricultural management practices", "Monoculture", "Crop Yield Stability", "Biology", "0105 earth and related environmental sciences", "Literature review", "Response ratio", "Soil science", "2. Zero hunger", "Soil organic matter", "Soil Fertility", "Conventional tillage", "Geography", "Life Sciences", "Agriculture", "04 agricultural and veterinary sciences", "Soil Nutrient Management", "15. Life on land", "Agronomy", "Chemistry", "Archaeology", "13. Climate action", "0401 agriculture", " forestry", " and fisheries", "Organic matter", "Intercropping in Agricultural Systems", "Soil Carbon Dynamics and Nutrient Cycling in Ecosystems", "Agronomy and Crop Science", "Mathematics"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10.60692/wzwcw-szh03"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Agriculture%2C%20Ecosystems%20%26amp%3B%20Environment", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.60692/wzwcw-szh03", "name": "item", "description": "10.60692/wzwcw-szh03", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.60692/wzwcw-szh03"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2018-10-01T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.7717/peerj.8749", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"license": "Open Access", "updated": "2026-07-25T16:24:30Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2020-03-24", "title": "Potential of the economic valuation of soil-based ecosystem services to inform sustainable soil management and policy", "description": "<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><article><p>The concept of ecosystem services, especially in combination with economic valuation, can illuminate trade-offs involved in soil management, policy and governance, and thus support decision making. In this paper, we investigate and highlight the potential and limitations of the economic valuation of soil-based ecosystem services to inform sustainable soil management and policy. We formulate a definition of soil-based ecosystem services as basis for conducting a review of existing soil valuation studies with a focus on the inclusion of ecosystem services and the choice of valuation methods. We find that, so far, the economic valuation of soil-based ecosystem services has covered only a small number of such services and most studies have employed cost-based methods rather than state-of-the-art preference-based valuation methods, even though the latter would better acknowledge the public good character of soil related services. Therefore, the relevance of existing valuation studies for political processes is low. Broadening the spectrum of analyzed ecosystem services as well as using preference-based methods would likely increase the informational quality and policy relevance of valuation results. We point out options for improvement based on recent advances in economic valuation theory and practice. We conclude by investigating the specific roles economic valuation results can play in different phases of the policy-making process, and the specific requirements for its usefulness in this context.</p></article>", "keywords": ["Literature review", "2. Zero hunger", "QH301-705.5", "R", "0211 other engineering and technologies", "02 engineering and technology", "15. Life on land", "12. Responsible consumption", "Multifunctionality", "Ecosystem services", "Economic valuation", "Medicine", "Policy cycle", "Biology (General)", "Agricultural Science", "10. No inequality", "Agri-environmental policy"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8749"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/PeerJ", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.7717/peerj.8749", "name": "item", "description": "10.7717/peerj.8749", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.7717/peerj.8749"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2020-03-24T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "2807448259", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-07-25T16:25:57Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2018-05-31", "title": "Effects of agricultural management practices on soil quality: A review of long-term experiments for Europe and China", "description": "Open AccessIn this paper we present effects of four paired agricultural management practices (organic matter (OM) addition versus no organic matter input, no-tillage (NT) versus conventional tillage, crop rotation versus monoculture, and organic agriculture versus conventional agriculture) on five key soil quality indicators, i.e., soil organic matter (SOM) content, pH, aggregate stability, earthworms (numbers) and crop yield. We have considered organic matter addition, no-tillage, crop rotation and organic agriculture as 'promising practices'; no organic matter input, conventional tillage, monoculture and conventional farming were taken as the respective references or 'standard practice' (baseline). Relative effects were analysed through indicator response ratio (RR) under each paired practice. For this we considered data of 30 long-term experiments collected from 13 case study sites in Europe and China as collated in the framework of the EU-China funded iSQAPER project. These were complemented with data from 42 long-term experiments across China and 402 observations of long-term trials published in the literature. Out of these, we only considered experiments covering at least five years. The results show that OM addition favourably affected all the indicators under consideration. The most favourable effect was reported on earthworm numbers, followed by yield, SOM content and soil aggregate stability. For pH, effects depended on soil type; OM input favourably affected the pH of acidic soils, whereas no clear trend was observed under NT. NT generally led to increased aggregate stability and greater SOM content in upper soil horizons. However, the magnitude of the relative effects varied, e.g. with soil texture. No-tillage practices enhanced earthworm populations, but not where herbicides or pesticides were applied to combat weeds and pests. Overall, in this review, yield slightly decreased under NT. Crop rotation had a positive effect on SOM content and yield; rotation with ley very positively influenced earthworms' numbers. Overall, crop rotation had little impact on soil pH and aggregate stability \u2212 depending on the type of intercrop; alternatively, rotation of arable crops only resulted in adverse effects. A clear positive trend was observed for earthworm abundance under organic agriculture. Further, organic agriculture generally resulted in increased aggregate stability and greater SOM content. Overall, no clear trend was found for pH; a decrease in yield was observed under organic agriculture in this review.", "keywords": ["Soil Science", "Organic chemistry", "Crop", "01 natural sciences", "Long-term field experiments", "Crop Productivity", "Soil quality", "Environmental science", "Organic Matter Dynamics", "Tillage", "Agricultural and Biological Sciences", "Soil quality indicators", "Crop rotation", "Management of Soil Fertility and Crop Productivity", "Soil water", "FOS: Mathematics", "Agricultural management practices", "Monoculture", "Crop Yield Stability", "Biology", "0105 earth and related environmental sciences", "Literature review", "Response ratio", "Soil science", "2. Zero hunger", "Soil organic matter", "Soil Fertility", "Conventional tillage", "Geography", "Life Sciences", "Agriculture", "04 agricultural and veterinary sciences", "Soil Nutrient Management", "15. Life on land", "Agronomy", "Chemistry", "Archaeology", "13. Climate action", "0401 agriculture", " forestry", " and fisheries", "Organic matter", "Intercropping in Agricultural Systems", "Soil Carbon Dynamics and Nutrient Cycling in Ecosystems", "Agronomy and Crop Science", "Mathematics"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/2807448259"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Agriculture%2C%20Ecosystems%20%26amp%3B%20Environment", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "2807448259", "name": "item", "description": "2807448259", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/2807448259"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2018-10-01T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "20.500.11850/562259", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-07-25T16:25:29Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2022-07-28", "title": "Reviews and syntheses: The promise of big diverse soil data, moving current practices towards future potential", "description": "<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><article><p>Abstract. In the age of big data, soil data are more available and richer than ever, but \u2013 outside of a few large soil survey resources \u2013 they remain largely unusable for informing soil management and understanding Earth system processes beyond the original study. Data science has promised a fully reusable research pipeline where data from past studies are used to contextualize new findings and reanalyzed for new insight. Yet synthesis projects encounter challenges at all steps of the data reuse pipeline, including unavailable data, labor-intensive transcription of datasets, incomplete metadata, and a lack of communication between collaborators. Here, using insights from a diversity of soil, data, and climate scientists, we summarize current practices in soil data synthesis across all stages of database creation: availability, input, harmonization, curation, and publication. We then suggest new soil-focused semantic tools to improve existing data pipelines, such as ontologies, vocabulary lists, and community practices. Our goal is to provide the soil data community with an overview of current practices in soil data and where we need to go to fully leverage big data to solve soil problems in the next century.</p></article>", "keywords": ["FOS: Computer and information sciences", "0301 basic medicine", "Data Sharing", "Information Systems and Management", "literature review", "1904 Earth-Surface Processes", "Social Sciences", "data set", "01 natural sciences", "Decision Sciences", "Data science", "Life", "QH501-531", "910 Geography & travel", "soil analysis", "database", "QH540-549.5", "2. Zero hunger", "QE1-996.5", "000", "Ecology", "communication", "Physics", "Earth", "Geology", "[SDU.ENVI] Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Continental interfaces", " environment", "World Wide Web", "10122 Institute of Geography", "soil survey", "Physical Sciences", "Data Reuse", "environment", "Information Systems", "Evolution", "future prospect", "Data management", "Data Sharing and Stewardship in Science", "Database", "Big data", "03 medical and health sciences", "Behavior and Systematics", "Data mining", "0105 earth and related environmental sciences", "[SDU.OCEAN]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Ocean", "Management and Reproducibility of Scientific Workflows", "Metadata", "Data curation", "Atmosphere", "[SDU.OCEAN] Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Ocean", " Atmosphere", "Acoustics", "15. Life on land", "Computer science", "1105 Ecology", " Evolution", " Behavior and Systematics", "Surface Processes", "Harmonization", "FOS: Biological sciences", "Computer Science", "Environmental Science", "[SDU.ENVI]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Continental interfaces", "soil management", "Research Data", "Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Monitoring"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/20.500.11850/562259"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Biogeosciences", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "20.500.11850/562259", "name": "item", "description": "20.500.11850/562259", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/20.500.11850/562259"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2022-07-28T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "3013696476", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-07-25T16:26:12Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2020-03-24", "title": "Potential of the economic valuation of soil-based ecosystem services to inform sustainable soil management and policy", "description": "<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><article><p>The concept of ecosystem services, especially in combination with economic valuation, can illuminate trade-offs involved in soil management, policy and governance, and thus support decision making. In this paper, we investigate and highlight the potential and limitations of the economic valuation of soil-based ecosystem services to inform sustainable soil management and policy. We formulate a definition of soil-based ecosystem services as basis for conducting a review of existing soil valuation studies with a focus on the inclusion of ecosystem services and the choice of valuation methods. We find that, so far, the economic valuation of soil-based ecosystem services has covered only a small number of such services and most studies have employed cost-based methods rather than state-of-the-art preference-based valuation methods, even though the latter would better acknowledge the public good character of soil related services. Therefore, the relevance of existing valuation studies for political processes is low. Broadening the spectrum of analyzed ecosystem services as well as using preference-based methods would likely increase the informational quality and policy relevance of valuation results. We point out options for improvement based on recent advances in economic valuation theory and practice. We conclude by investigating the specific roles economic valuation results can play in different phases of the policy-making process, and the specific requirements for its usefulness in this context.</p></article>", "keywords": ["Literature review", "2. Zero hunger", "QH301-705.5", "R", "0211 other engineering and technologies", "02 engineering and technology", "15. Life on land", "12. Responsible consumption", "Multifunctionality", "Ecosystem services", "Economic valuation", "Medicine", "Policy cycle", "Biology (General)", "Agricultural Science", "10. No inequality", "Agri-environmental policy"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/3013696476"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/PeerJ", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "3013696476", "name": "item", "description": "3013696476", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/3013696476"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2020-03-24T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "PMC7100588", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-07-25T16:28:11Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2020-03-24", "title": "Potential of the economic valuation of soil-based ecosystem services to inform sustainable soil management and policy", "description": "<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><article><p>The concept of ecosystem services, especially in combination with economic valuation, can illuminate trade-offs involved in soil management, policy and governance, and thus support decision making. In this paper, we investigate and highlight the potential and limitations of the economic valuation of soil-based ecosystem services to inform sustainable soil management and policy. We formulate a definition of soil-based ecosystem services as basis for conducting a review of existing soil valuation studies with a focus on the inclusion of ecosystem services and the choice of valuation methods. We find that, so far, the economic valuation of soil-based ecosystem services has covered only a small number of such services and most studies have employed cost-based methods rather than state-of-the-art preference-based valuation methods, even though the latter would better acknowledge the public good character of soil related services. Therefore, the relevance of existing valuation studies for political processes is low. Broadening the spectrum of analyzed ecosystem services as well as using preference-based methods would likely increase the informational quality and policy relevance of valuation results. We point out options for improvement based on recent advances in economic valuation theory and practice. We conclude by investigating the specific roles economic valuation results can play in different phases of the policy-making process, and the specific requirements for its usefulness in this context.</p></article>", "keywords": ["Literature review", "2. Zero hunger", "QH301-705.5", "R", "0211 other engineering and technologies", "02 engineering and technology", "15. Life on land", "12. Responsible consumption", "Multifunctionality", "Ecosystem services", "Economic valuation", "Medicine", "Policy cycle", "Biology (General)", "Agricultural Science", "10. No inequality", "Agri-environmental policy"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/PMC7100588"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/PeerJ", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "PMC7100588", "name": "item", "description": "PMC7100588", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/PMC7100588"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2020-03-24T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "8eaa8c49-62ed-4e96-838d-157074275cc3", "type": "Feature", "geometry": {"type": "Polygon", "coordinates": [[[5.81, 47.26], [5.81, 54.76], [15.77, 54.76], [15.77, 47.26], [5.81, 47.26]]]}, "properties": {"themes": [{"concepts": [{"id": "farming"}], "scheme": "https://standards.iso.org/iso/19139/resources/gmxCodelists.xml#MD_TopicCategoryCode"}, {"concepts": [{"id": "literature reviews"}, {"id": "agriculture"}, {"id": "stakeholder engagement"}, {"id": "living labs"}], "scheme": "AGROVOC Multilingual agricultural thesaurus"}, {"concepts": [{"id": "opendata"}, {"id": "environment"}], "scheme": "Individual"}, {"concepts": [{"id": "Lebensr\u00e4ume und Biotope"}], "scheme": "GEMET - INSPIRE themes, version 1.0"}, {"concepts": [{"id": "non-spatial"}], "scheme": "individual"}], "license": "CC BY", "rights": "Restrictions applied to assure the protection of privacy or intellectual property, and any special restrictions or limitations or warnings on using the resource or metadata. Reports, articles, papers, scientific and non - scientific works of any form, including tables, maps, or any other kind of output, in printed or electronic form, based in whole or in part on the data supplied, must contain an acknowledgement of the form: \"Data reused from the BonaRes Data Centre www.bonares.de. This data were created as part of the ZALF Datenerfassung's research activities.\" Although every care has been taken in preparing and testing the data, the ZALF Datenerfassung and the BonaRes Data Centre cannot guarantee that the data are correct; neither does the ZALF Datenerfassung and the BonaRes Data Centre accept any liability whatsoever for any error, missing data or omission in the data, or for any loss or damage arising from its use. The ZALF Datenerfassung and BonaRes Data Centre will not be responsible for any direct or indirect use which might be made of the data.", "updated": "2024-09-11", "type": "Dataset", "created": "2024-05-07", "language": "eng", "title": "The Use of Participatory Modelling Methods in Agri-Environmental Research \u2013 A Systematic Mapping Dataset", "description": "This dataset contains an analysis of 188 peer-reviewed publications. 78 case studies, that applied participatory modeling methods in agricultural and environmental research, were analyzed in detail. 110 further publications, which were filtered out during full-text analysis, are also included but not described in detail. For 857 other publications, which were filtered out after scanning of titles and abstracts, bibliographic information is available. The Excel spreadsheet with the analysis of the 188 peer-reviewed publications can be downloaded in CSV or XLSX format by clicking on the \u201cDownload\u201d button. Bibliographic information on all publications and a description of the columns of the Excel spreadsheet can be found under Description  Supplemental information.", "formats": [{"name": "CSV"}], "keywords": ["literature reviews", "agriculture", "stakeholder engagement", "living labs", "opendata", "environment", "Lebensr\u00e4ume und Biotope", "non-spatial"], "contacts": [{"name": "Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research", "organization": "ZALF", "position": "Research Platform 'Data Analysis & Simulation' - Workgroup Research Data Management", "roles": ["publisher"], "phones": [{"value": "+49 33432 82 300"}], "emails": [{"value": "dataservice@zalf.de"}], "addresses": [{"deliveryPoint": ["Eberswalder Strasse 84"], "city": "M\u00fcncheberg", "administrativeArea": "Brandenburg", "postalCode": "15374", "country": "Germany"}], "links": [{"href": {"url": null, "protocol": null, "protocol_url": "", "name": "https://ror.org/01ygyzs83", "name_url": "", "description": "ROR", "description_url": "", "applicationprofile": null, "applicationprofile_url": "", "function": null}}]}, {"name": "Toni Klemm", "organization": "Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research", "position": null, "roles": ["author"], "phones": [{"value": null}], "emails": [{"value": "toni.klemm@zalf.de"}], "addresses": [{"deliveryPoint": [null], "city": null, "administrativeArea": null, "postalCode": null, "country": null}], "links": [{"href": {"url": null, "protocol": null, "protocol_url": "", "name": "0000-0001-7733-6803", "name_url": "", "description": "ORCID", "description_url": "", "applicationprofile": null, "applicationprofile_url": "", "function": null}}]}, {"name": "Toni Klemm", "organization": "Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research", "position": null, "roles": ["projectLeader"], "phones": [{"value": null}], "emails": [{"value": "toni.klemm@zalf.de"}], "addresses": [{"deliveryPoint": [null], "city": null, "administrativeArea": null, "postalCode": null, "country": null}], "links": [{"href": {"url": null, "protocol": null, "protocol_url": "", "name": "0000-0001-7733-6803", "name_url": "", "description": "ORCID", "description_url": "", "applicationprofile": null, "applicationprofile_url": "", "function": null}}]}, {"organization": "Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research", "roles": ["contributor"]}]}, "links": [{"href": "https://maps.bonares.de/mapapps/resources/apps/bonares/index.html?lang=en&mid=8eaa8c49-62ed-4e96-838d-157074275cc3", "rel": "information"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "8eaa8c49-62ed-4e96-838d-157074275cc3", "name": "item", "description": "8eaa8c49-62ed-4e96-838d-157074275cc3", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/8eaa8c49-62ed-4e96-838d-157074275cc3"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2024-09-11T00:00:00Z"}}], "links": [{"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "This document as GeoJSON", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items?keywords=Literature+review&f=json", "hreflang": "en-US"}, {"rel": "alternate", "type": "text/html", "title": "This document as HTML", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items?keywords=Literature+review&f=html", "hreflang": "en-US"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection URL", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main", "hreflang": "en-US"}, {"type": "application/geo+json", "rel": "first", "title": "items (first)", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items?keywords=Literature+review&", "hreflang": "en-US"}, {"rel": "last", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "items (last)", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items?keywords=Literature+review&offset=12", "hreflang": "en-US"}], "numberMatched": 12, "numberReturned": 12, "distributedFeatures": [], "timeStamp": "2026-07-26T07:21:29.538083Z"}