{"type": "FeatureCollection", "features": [{"id": "10.1007/s13593-023-00911-x", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"license": "Open Access", "updated": "2026-06-25T16:16:40Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2023-09-04", "title": "The role of conservation agriculture practices in mitigating N2O emissions: A meta-analysis", "description": "Abstract\uffc2\uffa0<p>Conservation agriculture is often assumed to reduce soil N2O emissions. Yet, studies analyzing the specific effect of conservation agriculture practices on N2O emissions give contradictory results. Herein, we synthesized a comprehensive database on the three main conservation agriculture practices (cover crops, diversified crop rotations, and no-till and/or reduced tillage (NT/RT)) to elucidate the role of conservation practices on N2O emissions. Further, we used a random meta-forest approach to identify the most important predictors of the effects of these practices on soil N2O emissions. Averaged across all comparisons, NT/RT significantly decreased soil N2O emissions by 11% (95% CI: \uffe2\uff80\uff9319 to \uffe2\uff80\uff931%) compared to conventional tillage. The reductions due to NT/RT were more commonly observed in humid climates and in soils with an initial carbon content &lt; 20 g kg\uffe2\uff80\uff931. The implementation of cover crops and diversified crop rotations led to variable effects on soil N2O emissions. Cover crops were more likely to reduce soil N2O emissions at neutral soil pH, and in soils with intermediate carbon (~20 g kg\uffe2\uff80\uff931) and nitrogen (~3 g kg\uffe2\uff80\uff931) contents. Diversified crop rotations tended to increase soil N2O emissions in temperate regions and neutral to alkaline soils. Our results provide a comprehensive predictive framework to understand the conditions in which the adoption of various conservation agriculture practices can contribute to climate change mitigation. Combining these results with a similar mechanistic understanding of conservation agriculture impacts on ecosystem services and crop production will pave the way for a wider adoption globally of these management practices.</p", "keywords": ["2. Zero hunger", "Diversified crop rotations", "Nitrous oxide", "13. Climate action", "Cover crops", "Agricultural management practices", "Reduced tillage", "No-till", "15. Life on land"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-023-00911-x"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Agronomy%20for%20Sustainable%20Development", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.1007/s13593-023-00911-x", "name": "item", "description": "10.1007/s13593-023-00911-x", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.1007/s13593-023-00911-x"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2023-09-04T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.1016/j.agee.2016.10.024", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-06-25T16:16:57Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2016-11-04", "title": "Soil carbon sequestration rates under Mediterranean woody crops using recommended management practices: A meta-analysis", "description": "Abstract   Mediterranean woody crops, such as olive and almond farming, and vineyards are usually cultivated in soils low in organic matter, with limited water availability and frequently on medium to steep slopes. Therefore, when conventionally cultivated, soils of these cropping systems are net sources of CO2 (throughout soil erosion and organic carbon mineralization). A promising option to sequester carbon (C) in these cropping systems is the implementation of recommended management practices (RMPs), which include plant cover in the inter-row area, minimum or no tillage and off- and on-farm organic matter amendments. However, the effects of RMPs on soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks in these cropping systems are widely overlooked, despite the critical importance of estimating their contribution on CO2 emissions for policy decisions in the agriculture sector in Mediterranean regions. We therefore conducted a meta-analysis to derive a C response ratio, soil C sequestration rate and soil C sequestration efficiency under RMPs, compared to conventional management of olive and almond orchards, and vineyards (144 data sets from 51 references). RMPs included organic amendments (OA), plant cover (CC) and a combination of the two (CMP). The highest soil C sequestration rate (5.3\u00a0t\u00a0C\u00a0ha\u22121 yr\u22121) was observed following the application OA in olive orchards (especially after olive mill pomace application), whereas CC management achieved the lowest C sequestration rates (1.1, 0.78 and 2.0\u00a0t\u00a0C\u00a0ha\u22121 yr\u22121, for olive orchards, vineyards and almond orchards, respectively). Efficiency of soil C sequestration was greater than 100% after OA and CMP managements, indicating that: i) some of the organic C inputs were unaccounted for, and ii) a positive feedback effect of the application of these amendments on SOC retention (e.g. reduction of soil erosion) and on protective mechanisms of the SOC which reduce CO2 emissions. Soil C sequestration rate tended to be highest during the first years after the change of the management and progressively decreased. Studies performed in Mediterranean sub-climates of low annual precipitation had lower values of soil C sequestration rate, likely due to a lower biomass production of the crop and other plant cover. Soil C sequestration rates in olive farming were much higher than that of vineyards, mainly due to the application of higher annual doses of organic amendments. The relatively high sequestration rate combined with the relative large spatial extent of these cropping system areas suggests that the adoption of RMPs is a sustainable and efficient measure to mitigate climate change.", "keywords": ["2. Zero hunger", "330", "QH301 Biology", "04 agricultural and veterinary sciences", "15. Life on land", "recommended management practices", "carbon sequestration", "01 natural sciences", "6. Clean water", "12. Responsible consumption", "soil organic carbon", "QH301", "13. Climate action", "SDG 13 - Climate Action", "0401 agriculture", " forestry", " and fisheries", "Mediterranean woody crops", "0105 earth and related environmental sciences"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.10.024"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Agriculture%2C%20Ecosystems%20%26amp%3B%20Environment", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.1016/j.agee.2016.10.024", "name": "item", "description": "10.1016/j.agee.2016.10.024", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.1016/j.agee.2016.10.024"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2016-11-01T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.1007/s11027-020-09916-3", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-06-25T16:16:11Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2020-06-22", "title": "The effect of crop residues, cover crops, manures and nitrogen fertilization on soil organic carbon changes in agroecosystems: a synthesis of reviews", "description": "Abstract<p>International initiatives are emphasizing the capture of atmospheric CO2 in soil organic C (SOC) to reduce the climatic footprint from agroecosystems. One approach to quantify the contribution of management practices towards that goal is through analysis of long-term experiments (LTEs). Our objectives were to analyze knowledge gained in literature reviews on SOC changes in LTEs, to evaluate the results regarding interactions with pedo-climatological factors, and to discuss disparities among reviews in data selection criteria. We summarized mean response ratios (RRs) and stock change rate (SCR) effect size indices from twenty reviews using paired comparisons (N). The highest RRs were found with manure applications (30%, N\uffe2\uff80\uff89=\uffe2\uff80\uff89418), followed by aboveground crop residue retention and the use of cover crops (9\uffe2\uff80\uff9310%, N\uffe2\uff80\uff89=\uffe2\uff80\uff89995 and 129), while the effect of nitrogen fertilization was lowest (6%, N\uffe2\uff80\uff89=\uffe2\uff80\uff89846). SCR for nitrogen fertilization exceeded that for aboveground crop residue retention (233 versus 117\uffc2\uffa0kg\uffc2\uffa0C\uffc2\uffa0ha\uffe2\uff88\uff921\uffc2\uffa0year\uffe2\uff88\uff921, N\uffe2\uff80\uff89=\uffe2\uff80\uff89183 and 279) and was highest for manure applications and cover crops (409 and 331\uffc2\uffa0kg\uffc2\uffa0C\uffc2\uffa0ha\uffe2\uff88\uff921\uffc2\uffa0year\uffe2\uff88\uff921, N\uffe2\uff80\uff89=\uffe2\uff80\uff89217 and 176). When data allows, we recommend calculating both RR and SCR because it improves the interpretation. Our synthesis shows that results are not always consistent among reviews and that interaction with texture and climate remain inconclusive. Selection criteria for study durations are highly variable, resulting in irregular conclusions for the effect of time on changes in SOC. We also discuss the relationships of SOC changes with yield and cropping systems, as well as conceptual problems when scaling-up results obtained from field studies to regional levels.</p", "keywords": ["Carbon sequestration", "DYNAMICS", "Management practices", "Environmental Sciences & Ecology", "SEQUESTRATION", "4104 Environmental management", "Stock change rates", "MANAGEMENT", "STOCKS", "Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences", "AGRICULTURAL SOILS", "0502 Environmental Science and Management", "S Agriculture (General)", "Agricultural Science", "METAANALYSIS", "TILLAGE", "2. Zero hunger", "Science & Technology", "CLIMATE-CHANGE", "Soil organic carbon", "Relative response ratio", "04 agricultural and veterinary sciences", "15. Life on land", "LONG", "Meta-analysis", "0501 Ecological Applications", "13. Climate action", "0401 agriculture", " forestry", " and fisheries", "Life Sciences & Biomedicine", "MATTER", "Environmental Sciences"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://pub.epsilon.slu.se/17675/1/bolinder_m_a_et_al_200930.pdf"}, {"href": "https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11027-020-09916-3.pdf"}, {"href": "https://rau.repository.guildhe.ac.uk/id/eprint/16409/1/Bolinder2020_Article_TheEffectOfCropResiduesCoverCr.pdf"}, {"href": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-020-09916-3"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Mitigation%20and%20Adaptation%20Strategies%20for%20Global%20Change", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.1007/s11027-020-09916-3", "name": "item", "description": "10.1007/s11027-020-09916-3", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.1007/s11027-020-09916-3"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2020-06-22T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.1016/j.agee.2018.05.028", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-06-25T16:16:58Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2018-05-31", "title": "Effects of agricultural management practices on soil quality: A review of long-term experiments for Europe and China", "description": "Open AccessIn this paper we present effects of four paired agricultural management practices (organic matter (OM) addition versus no organic matter input, no-tillage (NT) versus conventional tillage, crop rotation versus monoculture, and organic agriculture versus conventional agriculture) on five key soil quality indicators, i.e., soil organic matter (SOM) content, pH, aggregate stability, earthworms (numbers) and crop yield. We have considered organic matter addition, no-tillage, crop rotation and organic agriculture as 'promising practices'; no organic matter input, conventional tillage, monoculture and conventional farming were taken as the respective references or 'standard practice' (baseline). Relative effects were analysed through indicator response ratio (RR) under each paired practice. For this we considered data of 30 long-term experiments collected from 13 case study sites in Europe and China as collated in the framework of the EU-China funded iSQAPER project. These were complemented with data from 42 long-term experiments across China and 402 observations of long-term trials published in the literature. Out of these, we only considered experiments covering at least five years. The results show that OM addition favourably affected all the indicators under consideration. The most favourable effect was reported on earthworm numbers, followed by yield, SOM content and soil aggregate stability. For pH, effects depended on soil type; OM input favourably affected the pH of acidic soils, whereas no clear trend was observed under NT. NT generally led to increased aggregate stability and greater SOM content in upper soil horizons. However, the magnitude of the relative effects varied, e.g. with soil texture. No-tillage practices enhanced earthworm populations, but not where herbicides or pesticides were applied to combat weeds and pests. Overall, in this review, yield slightly decreased under NT. Crop rotation had a positive effect on SOM content and yield; rotation with ley very positively influenced earthworms' numbers. Overall, crop rotation had little impact on soil pH and aggregate stability \u2212 depending on the type of intercrop; alternatively, rotation of arable crops only resulted in adverse effects. A clear positive trend was observed for earthworm abundance under organic agriculture. Further, organic agriculture generally resulted in increased aggregate stability and greater SOM content. Overall, no clear trend was found for pH; a decrease in yield was observed under organic agriculture in this review.", "keywords": ["China", "Soil Science", "Organic chemistry", "Crop", "01 natural sciences", "Long-term field experiments", "Crop Productivity", "Soil quality", "Environmental science", "Organic Matter Dynamics", "Tillage", "Agricultural and Biological Sciences", "Soil quality indicators", "Crop rotation", "Management of Soil Fertility and Crop Productivity", "Soil water", "FOS: Mathematics", "Agricultural management practices", "Monoculture", "Crop Yield Stability", "Biology", "0105 earth and related environmental sciences", "Literature review", "Response ratio", "Soil science", "2. Zero hunger", "Soil organic matter", "Soil Fertility", "Conventional tillage", "Geography", "Life Sciences", "Agriculture", "04 agricultural and veterinary sciences", "Soil Nutrient Management", "15. Life on land", "Agronomy", "Europe", "Chemistry", "Archaeology", "13. Climate action", "0401 agriculture", " forestry", " and fisheries", "Crop husbandry", "Organic matter", "Intercropping in Agricultural Systems", "Soil Carbon Dynamics and Nutrient Cycling in Ecosystems", "Agronomy and Crop Science", "Mathematics"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.05.028"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Agriculture%2C%20Ecosystems%20%26amp%3B%20Environment", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.1016/j.agee.2018.05.028", "name": "item", "description": "10.1016/j.agee.2018.05.028", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.1016/j.agee.2018.05.028"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2018-10-01T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.1016/j.agee.2021.107551", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"license": "Open Access", "updated": "2026-06-25T16:16:59Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2021-07-06", "title": "Impacts of agronomic measures on crop, soil, and environmental indicators: A review and synthesis of meta-analysis", "description": "Abstract   Sustainable agricultural management implies optimization of resources for crop production while minimizing adverse impacts on the environment. This requires a better understanding of the synergies and trade-offs of agronomic management while accounting for the controlling effects of site-specific factors (covariates). We systematically evaluated 113 meta-analytical studies assessing impacts of crop management measures (rotation, cover cropping, residue retention), soil and water measures (irrigation, tillage), soil amendments (enhanced efficiency, biochar), fertilizer use (organic, mineral, combined organic-mineral) and \u201c4R'\u201d fertilizer strategies (right source, rate, timing, placement) on sustainability indicators. These indicators include crop yield, crop N and P (content, uptake, and use efficiency), soil quality indicators (soil organic C, N and P contents, compaction), soil emissions of ammonia (NH3) and greenhouse gases (CO2, N2O), and nutrient losses to water (N and P surplus or leaching). Nutrient management, including 4R practices as well as enhanced efficiency amendments, had the largest impact, increasing crop yields and N uptake while reducing N2O and NH3 emissions as well as N surplus, whereas effects on CO2 emissions were variable. Although all measures positively impacted soil C, the largest effect was due to biochar, followed by organic fertilizer input. Biochar positively impacted crop yield, diminished N2O and NH3 emissions as well as N surplus, and increased CO2 emissions. Within crop management, only cover cropping had a significant positive effect on crop yield, while both cover crops and rotation slightly enhanced N uptake and the sequestration of C and N in soil, thus reducing N2O emissions and N surplus. Minimal tillage practices generally increased SOC, while results for crop yield, N surplus and N2O emissions were variable. Site-specific factors had substantial impacts on the evaluated impacts of measures, most importantly climate, crop type, soil texture, soil pH, soil organic C, N dose, and experimental duration. Considering the variation among meta-analytical protocols followed, we recommend that field studies and meta-analytical work adhere to harmonized guidelines with respect to the reporting of site-level data, experimental design, and the statistical procedures used. This will ensure data comparability between studies, improve the quality of meta-analysis results, and give better insights into currently uncertain or unknown impacts of agronomic measures.", "keywords": ["0301 basic medicine", "2. Zero hunger", "Soil organic carbon", "Management practices", "Agronomic indicators", "Review", "04 agricultural and veterinary sciences", "15. Life on land", "12. Responsible consumption", "Meta-analysis", "03 medical and health sciences", "Emissions", "13. Climate action", "Nutrient use efficiency", "0401 agriculture", " forestry", " and fisheries", "Crop yield", "Nutrient surplus"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2021.107551"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Agriculture%2C%20Ecosystems%20%26amp%3B%20Environment", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.1016/j.agee.2021.107551", "name": "item", "description": "10.1016/j.agee.2021.107551", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.1016/j.agee.2021.107551"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2021-10-01T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.1111/ejss.13468", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"license": "Open Access", "updated": "2026-06-25T16:21:40Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2024-03-13", "title": "Collected knowledge on the impacts of agricultural soil management practices in Europe", "description": "Abstract<p>Soil plays a central role in most aspects of human societies, and there is a large body of literature about sustainable soil management. Nevertheless, soil is currently facing degradation arising from different threats, which undermines sustainable development globally. In order to design effective research and policy strategies, it is necessary to identify the current knowledge level about sustainable soil management. This study summarises the key findings from a systematic stocktake of available knowledge about agricultural soil management practices in 23 European countries, which included the identification of soil management practices in use, the associated impacts and the soil challenges addressed. The aim of the study was to understand the current state of knowledge about the impacts of soil management practices, investigated and/or implemented across Europe. The results were analysed at the European level and were also grouped into European Regions and Environmental Zones. Key findings from this study were the identification of knowledge gaps that are key to climate mitigation and adaptation. There is a knowledge gap about soil management practices to avoid greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural soils, as the few reported studies evidence the complexity of the processes governing these emissions. Further knowledge is needed on the impact of tillage practices on long\uffe2\uff80\uff90term carbon storage and distribution along the soil profile, as the reported knowledge was not consensual about carbon storage in deeper soil layers.</p", "keywords": ["[SDV.SA.AGRO] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences/Agronomy", "2. Zero hunger", "stocktake", "[SDE.MCG]Environmental Sciences/Global Changes", "[SDV.SA.AGRO]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences/Agronomy", "knowledge level", "04 agricultural and veterinary sciences", "[SDV.SA.SDS]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences/Soil study", "15. Life on land", "01 natural sciences", "630", "soil challenges", "knowledge gaps", "12. Responsible consumption", "soil management practices", "[SDE.MCG] Environmental Sciences/Global Changes", "13. Climate action", "EJPSOIL", "11. Sustainability", "0401 agriculture", " forestry", " and fisheries", "soil policy", "[SDV.SA.SDS] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences/Soil study", "0105 earth and related environmental sciences"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.13468"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/European%20Journal%20of%20Soil%20Science", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.1111/ejss.13468", "name": "item", "description": "10.1111/ejss.13468", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.1111/ejss.13468"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2024-03-01T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.13031/2013.13599", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-06-25T16:22:48Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2013-10-22", "title": "Effectiveness Of Vegetated Buffer Strips In Reducing Pesticide Transport In Simulated Runoff", "description": "Several processes take place within vegetated buffer strips that affect their performance. To better understand  these processes, a runoff study was conducted to evaluate vegetated buffer strips performance in reducing atrazine,  metolachlor, and chlorpyrifos transport as affected by the drainage area to buffer strip area ratio. The simulated runoff water  mixed with pesticide\u2013treated soil was distributed onto six vegetated buffer strips, each 1.52 m wide . 20.12 m long, located  downslope of the inflow distribution tank in a well established vegetated grassed waterway. These strips provided for three  replications of two inflow rates designated as \u201cdrainage area/buffer strip area ratio treatments\u201d of 15:1 and 30:1. Infiltration  for the 15:1 treatment averaged 38.8% of the inflow volume, whereas it averaged 30.4% for the 30:1 treatment. Sediment  retention efficiencies averaged 90.1% and 86.8% for the 15:1 and 30:1 treatments, respectively. Concentrations of atrazine  and metolachlor associated with sediment outflows from the strips were larger than their respective inflow concentrations,  while the results were opposite for chlorpyrifos. Concentrations in runoff water for both atrazine and metolachlor in outflow  from the strips were smaller than the inflow concentrations; again, the results were opposite for chlorpyrifos. The 15:1  treatment retained an average of 52.5% of the total input of atrazine, 54.4% of metolachlor, and 83.1% of chlorpyrifos.  Corresponding numbers for the 30:1 treatment were 46.8% for atrazine, 48.1% for metolachlor, and 76.9% for chlorpyrifos.  Analysis of variance using the randomized block design showed that differences of percent retention of pesticide between  treatments were not significant for any of the three pesticides at the 10% significance level. A lack of significant difference  indicates either a need for more than three replications and/or larger area ratio treatments to be studied. The results of this  study indicate that a 30:1 area ratio buffer strip could perform equally as well as a 15:1 area ratio buffer strip. Thus, less  land would be required under buffer strips to get the desired results.", "keywords": ["Bioresource and Agricultural Engineering", "Runoff", "Agriculture", "Buffer strips", "04 agricultural and veterinary sciences", "01 natural sciences", "Filter strips", "6. Clean water", "Metolachlor", "Pesticide", "Water quality", "0401 agriculture", " forestry", " and fisheries", "Atrazine", "Chlorpyrifos", "Herbicide", "Best management practices", "Insecticide", "Simulation", "0105 earth and related environmental sciences"], "contacts": [{"organization": "Arora, Kapil, Mickelson, Steven, Baker, James,", "roles": ["creator"]}]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.13599"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Transactions%20of%20the%20ASAE", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.13031/2013.13599", "name": "item", "description": "10.13031/2013.13599", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.13031/2013.13599"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2003-01-01T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.13031/2013.27719", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"license": "unspecified", "updated": "2026-06-25T16:22:48Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2013-10-22", "title": "Herbicide Retention By Vegetative Buffer Strips From Runoff Under Natural Rainfall", "description": "Effectiveness of vegetative buffer strips for herbicide retention from agricultural runoff was evaluated in a two-year natural rainfall study. A source area of 0.41 ha (mainly Canisteo silty clay loam soil), having an average slope of 3%, was fall chisel-plowed, spring disked, and planted to corn. Three herbicides (atrazine, metolachlor, and cyanazine) were applied to the source area in each spring. Six vegetative buffer strips, 1.52 m wide \u00a5 20.12 m long, were isolated with metal borders downslope of the source area in a well established bromegrass (Bromus inermis) waterway. These strips provided for three replications of two drainage to buffer area ratio treatments of 15:1 and 30:1. Herbicide retention was dependent on the antecedent moisture conditions of the strips. These retentions ranged from 11 to 100% for atrazine, 16 to 100% for metolachlor, and 8 to 100% for cyanazine. Herbicide retention by the buffer strips for the two treatments were not significantly different for the observed storm events. Herbicide concentrations in solution in outflow from the strips were less than the inflow concentrations for all the three herbicides. Infiltration was the key process for herbicide retention by the buffer strips, although there was some adsorption to in-place soil and/or vegetation. Metolachlor concentrations in sediment increased in outflow for the two treatments; however, the opposite was true for atrazine and cyanazine. Herbicide retention by sediment deposition in the strip represented about 5% of the total herbicide retention by the buffer strips. The buffer strips were found to have high percent sediment retention, ranging from 40 to 100%; thus, the strips would be more effective for retaining strongly adsorbed herbicides.", "keywords": ["2. Zero hunger", "Bioresource and Agricultural Engineering", "Runoff", "Management practices", "Agriculture", "Buffer strips", "04 agricultural and veterinary sciences", "15. Life on land", "01 natural sciences", "Filter strips", "630", "6. Clean water", "Water quality", "0401 agriculture", " forestry", " and fisheries", "Herbicide", "0105 earth and related environmental sciences"], "contacts": [{"organization": "Arora, Kapil, Mickelson, Steven, Baker, James, Tierney, Dennis, Peters, C.,", "roles": ["creator"]}]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.27719"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Transactions%20of%20the%20ASAE", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.13031/2013.27719", "name": "item", "description": "10.13031/2013.27719", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.13031/2013.27719"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "1996-01-01T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.13031/2013.31054", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"license": "unspecified", "updated": "2026-06-25T16:22:48Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2013-10-22", "title": "Nutrient And Sediment Removal By Vegetated Filter Strips", "description": "ABSTRACT Afield study utilizing simulated rainfall and bare plots 5.5 m wide by 22 m long was conducted to study the effectiveness of vegetated filter strips 4.6 and 9.2 m long in removing nutrients and sediments from agricultural runoff. Losses of N and P from plots with filters were highly variable as compared to losses from plots with no filters. Generally, nutrient removals appeared to be greater with the longer filters, but decreased as the number of runoff events increased. Mass losses of TSS, TN and TP in surface runoff were reduced by 66%, 0% and 27%, respectively, by 4.6 m (15 ft) long filters. TSS, TN and TP reducfions by 9.2 m (30 ft) long filter strips of the lengths utilized in this study were effective in removing sediment from runoff but should not be relied upon as the primary means to reduce nutrient losses from agricultural areas.", "keywords": ["BMPs", "Diffuse pollution", "WFD", "Water framework directive", "0401 agriculture", " forestry", " and fisheries", "04 agricultural and veterinary sciences", "15. Life on land", "Best management practices", "Pollution control measures", "VFS", "6. Clean water"], "contacts": [{"organization": "Magette, W. L., Brinsfield, Russell B., Palmer, Robert E., Wood, James D.,", "roles": ["creator"]}]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.31054"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Transactions%20of%20the%20ASAE", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.13031/2013.31054", "name": "item", "description": "10.13031/2013.31054", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.13031/2013.31054"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "1989-01-01T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.20944/preprints202304.0088.v1", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"license": "Open Access", "updated": "2026-06-25T16:23:41Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2023-04-07", "title": "A Review of Permanent Grassland Grazing Management Practices and the Impacts on Principal Soil Quality Indicators", "description": "<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><article><p>Grasslands are at risk of degradation due to unsustainable management practices and climate change. Sustainable grassland soil management can promote ecosystem service delivery and improve the resilience of the entire grassland ecosystem to anthropogenic change. Here, we re-view the principal soil quality indicators (SQIs) and how they have been used to evaluate the sustainability of different grassland management practices globally. We then discuss sustainable grazing management practices, before reviewing some novel grassland species which may im-prove grassland resilience with relevance for grassland management in Europe and the UK. We also give an overview of current sustainable grassland management methods and their assessment at field scale. From this, we suggest that sustainable Grazing Management Plans (GMPs), together with the testing of drought-resistant grass species and appropriate SQIs monitoring, is key to increasing resilience of grassland ecosystems to anthropogenic change.</p></article>", "keywords": ["2. Zero hunger", "330", "S", "QH301 Biology", "soil quality indicators; grazing management; ecosystem services; permanent grasslands; management practices", "Agriculture", "15. Life on land", "12. Responsible consumption", "Permanent grasslands", "permanent grasslands", "QH301", "Soil quality indicators", "13. Climate action", "SDG 13 - Climate Action", "agricultural_science_and_agronomy_16", "management practices", "Ecosystem services", "Grazing management", "soil quality indicators", "grazing management", "ecosystem services"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://iris.unito.it/bitstream/2318/1910970/1/A53%20Grassland%20erosion%20Agronomy.pdf"}, {"href": "https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/13/5/1366/pdf"}, {"href": "https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202304.0088.v1"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Agronomy", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.20944/preprints202304.0088.v1", "name": "item", "description": "10.20944/preprints202304.0088.v1", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.20944/preprints202304.0088.v1"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2023-04-06T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.60692/wzwcw-szh03", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-06-25T16:30:30Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2018-05-30", "title": "Effects of agricultural management practices on soil quality: A review of long-term experiments for Europe and China", "description": "Open AccessIn this paper we present effects of four paired agricultural management practices (organic matter (OM) addition versus no organic matter input, no-tillage (NT) versus conventional tillage, crop rotation versus monoculture, and organic agriculture versus conventional agriculture) on five key soil quality indicators, i.e., soil organic matter (SOM) content, pH, aggregate stability, earthworms (numbers) and crop yield. We have considered organic matter addition, no-tillage, crop rotation and organic agriculture as 'promising practices'; no organic matter input, conventional tillage, monoculture and conventional farming were taken as the respective references or 'standard practice' (baseline). Relative effects were analysed through indicator response ratio (RR) under each paired practice. For this we considered data of 30 long-term experiments collected from 13 case study sites in Europe and China as collated in the framework of the EU-China funded iSQAPER project. These were complemented with data from 42 long-term experiments across China and 402 observations of long-term trials published in the literature. Out of these, we only considered experiments covering at least five years. The results show that OM addition favourably affected all the indicators under consideration. The most favourable effect was reported on earthworm numbers, followed by yield, SOM content and soil aggregate stability. For pH, effects depended on soil type; OM input favourably affected the pH of acidic soils, whereas no clear trend was observed under NT. NT generally led to increased aggregate stability and greater SOM content in upper soil horizons. However, the magnitude of the relative effects varied, e.g. with soil texture. No-tillage practices enhanced earthworm populations, but not where herbicides or pesticides were applied to combat weeds and pests. Overall, in this review, yield slightly decreased under NT. Crop rotation had a positive effect on SOM content and yield; rotation with ley very positively influenced earthworms' numbers. Overall, crop rotation had little impact on soil pH and aggregate stability \u2212 depending on the type of intercrop; alternatively, rotation of arable crops only resulted in adverse effects. A clear positive trend was observed for earthworm abundance under organic agriculture. Further, organic agriculture generally resulted in increased aggregate stability and greater SOM content. Overall, no clear trend was found for pH; a decrease in yield was observed under organic agriculture in this review.", "keywords": ["Soil Science", "Organic chemistry", "Crop", "01 natural sciences", "Long-term field experiments", "Crop Productivity", "Soil quality", "Environmental science", "Organic Matter Dynamics", "Tillage", "Agricultural and Biological Sciences", "Soil quality indicators", "Crop rotation", "Management of Soil Fertility and Crop Productivity", "Soil water", "FOS: Mathematics", "Agricultural management practices", "Monoculture", "Crop Yield Stability", "Biology", "0105 earth and related environmental sciences", "Literature review", "Response ratio", "Soil science", "2. Zero hunger", "Soil organic matter", "Soil Fertility", "Conventional tillage", "Geography", "Life Sciences", "Agriculture", "04 agricultural and veterinary sciences", "Soil Nutrient Management", "15. Life on land", "Agronomy", "Chemistry", "Archaeology", "13. Climate action", "0401 agriculture", " forestry", " and fisheries", "Organic matter", "Intercropping in Agricultural Systems", "Soil Carbon Dynamics and Nutrient Cycling in Ecosystems", "Agronomy and Crop Science", "Mathematics"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10.60692/wzwcw-szh03"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Agriculture%2C%20Ecosystems%20%26amp%3B%20Environment", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.60692/wzwcw-szh03", "name": "item", "description": "10.60692/wzwcw-szh03", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.60692/wzwcw-szh03"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2018-10-01T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.7910/DVN/3BLW7E", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"license": "Open Access", "updated": "2026-06-25T16:30:51Z", "type": "Dataset", "created": "2020-02-20", "title": "Soil organic carbon in agricultural systems of six countries in East Africa  \u2013 a literature review of status and carbon sequestration potential", "description": "Open AccessA systematic literature review of existing evidence on soil organic carbon (SOC) responses to agronomic best management practices (BMPs) in cultivated soils of East Africa, focusing on Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, Uganda, and Burundi. Examining current evidence on the extent to which BMPs can increase SOC stocks and whether net SOC sequestration is attainable in this region. The study also sought to identify knowledge gaps and make recommendations for future research. Independent variables:  \u2022 Annual rainfall (mm year-1), as semi-arid (&lt;600), sub-humid (601-1200), moist sub-humid (1201-1500), or humid (&gt;1500) \u2022 Temperature \u2022 Location,  \u2022 Altitude - lowland (&lt;1500 m above sea level (a.s.l.)) or highland (\u2265 1500 m a.s.l.).  \u2022 Soil characteristics \u2013 type, bulk density, texture \u2022 The time period after which changes in SOC were measured - short-term (&lt;10 years), medium-term (10-25 years), and long-term (&gt;25 years).  \u2022 Soil depth: 0-30 cm, 0-50 cm, and 0-100 cm. Dependent variables \u2022 Soil organic carbon stock (t C ha 1) \u2022 Soil organic carbon sequestration (t C ha 1 year-1) \u2022 Soil organic carbon loss (t C ha 1 year-1)", "keywords": ["soil organic carbon", "carbono organico del suelo", "Agricultural Sciences", "Soil organic carbon", "Earth and Environmental Sciences", "cropland", "Africa", "Cropland", "Multifunctional Landscapes", "tierras agricolas", "Best management practices", "East Africa"], "contacts": [{"organization": "Namirembe, Sara, Piikki, Kristin, Sommer, Rolf, S\u00f6derstr\u00f6m, Mats, Tessema, Bezaye, Nyawira, Sylvia,", "roles": ["creator"]}]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/3BLW7E"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.7910/DVN/3BLW7E", "name": "item", "description": "10.7910/DVN/3BLW7E", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.7910/DVN/3BLW7E"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2020-01-01T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10261/279377", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"license": "Open Access", "updated": "2026-06-25T16:31:09Z", "type": "Other", "title": "Managing water scarcity European and Chinese cropping systems", "description": "Open AccessPeer reviewed", "keywords": ["2. Zero hunger", "Conservation agriculture", "Cover crops", "Cropping systems", "Best Management Practices", "Water use efficiency", "SHui", "15. Life on land", "Remote sensing", "6. Clean water", "EU-China engagement", "13. Climate action", "Tree deficit irrigation", "Crop modeling", "Precision irrigation"], "contacts": [{"organization": "G\u00f3mez Calero, Jos\u00e9 Alfonso, Alarc\u00f3n Caba\u00f1ero, Juan Jos\u00e9, Intrigliolo, Diego S., Dost\u00e1l, Tom\u00e1\u0161, Quaranta, Gianni, Lannoy, Gabrielle de, Dodd, Ian C., Salvia, Rossana,", "roles": ["creator"]}]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10261/279377"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10261/279377", "name": "item", "description": "10261/279377", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10261/279377"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2022-01-01T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10261/394489", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"license": "Embargo", "updated": "2026-06-25T16:31:16Z", "type": "Dataset", "title": "Effect of regenerative agriculture in a commercial olive orchard in southern Spain after six years of implementation", "description": "EmbargoThis work has been supported by the Projects: \u201cMonitoring, reporting and verification of soil carbon and greenhouse gases balance\u201d (https://www.project-marvic.eu/) and Transforming Unsustainable management of soils in key agricultural systems in EU and China, Developing an integrated platform of alternatives to reverse soil degradation, under grant agreements No 101112942 and No 101000224, respectively.", "keywords": ["Agricultura sostenible", "Agroecolog\u00eda", "Cultivo le\u00f1oso", "Management practices", "Pr\u00e1cticas de manejo", "Woody crop", "Sustainable agriculture", "Agroecology"], "contacts": [{"organization": "Torr\u00fas-Castillo, Milagros, Macan, Giovana P. F., Landa, Blanca B., G\u00f3mez Calero, Jos\u00e9 Alfonso,", "roles": ["creator"]}]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10261/394489"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10261/394489", "name": "item", "description": "10261/394489", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10261/394489"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2025-01-01T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "2807448259", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-06-25T16:33:07Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2018-05-31", "title": "Effects of agricultural management practices on soil quality: A review of long-term experiments for Europe and China", "description": "Open AccessIn this paper we present effects of four paired agricultural management practices (organic matter (OM) addition versus no organic matter input, no-tillage (NT) versus conventional tillage, crop rotation versus monoculture, and organic agriculture versus conventional agriculture) on five key soil quality indicators, i.e., soil organic matter (SOM) content, pH, aggregate stability, earthworms (numbers) and crop yield. We have considered organic matter addition, no-tillage, crop rotation and organic agriculture as 'promising practices'; no organic matter input, conventional tillage, monoculture and conventional farming were taken as the respective references or 'standard practice' (baseline). Relative effects were analysed through indicator response ratio (RR) under each paired practice. For this we considered data of 30 long-term experiments collected from 13 case study sites in Europe and China as collated in the framework of the EU-China funded iSQAPER project. These were complemented with data from 42 long-term experiments across China and 402 observations of long-term trials published in the literature. Out of these, we only considered experiments covering at least five years. The results show that OM addition favourably affected all the indicators under consideration. The most favourable effect was reported on earthworm numbers, followed by yield, SOM content and soil aggregate stability. For pH, effects depended on soil type; OM input favourably affected the pH of acidic soils, whereas no clear trend was observed under NT. NT generally led to increased aggregate stability and greater SOM content in upper soil horizons. However, the magnitude of the relative effects varied, e.g. with soil texture. No-tillage practices enhanced earthworm populations, but not where herbicides or pesticides were applied to combat weeds and pests. Overall, in this review, yield slightly decreased under NT. Crop rotation had a positive effect on SOM content and yield; rotation with ley very positively influenced earthworms' numbers. Overall, crop rotation had little impact on soil pH and aggregate stability \u2212 depending on the type of intercrop; alternatively, rotation of arable crops only resulted in adverse effects. A clear positive trend was observed for earthworm abundance under organic agriculture. Further, organic agriculture generally resulted in increased aggregate stability and greater SOM content. Overall, no clear trend was found for pH; a decrease in yield was observed under organic agriculture in this review.", "keywords": ["Soil Science", "Organic chemistry", "Crop", "01 natural sciences", "Long-term field experiments", "Crop Productivity", "Soil quality", "Environmental science", "Organic Matter Dynamics", "Tillage", "Agricultural and Biological Sciences", "Soil quality indicators", "Crop rotation", "Management of Soil Fertility and Crop Productivity", "Soil water", "FOS: Mathematics", "Agricultural management practices", "Monoculture", "Crop Yield Stability", "Biology", "0105 earth and related environmental sciences", "Literature review", "Response ratio", "Soil science", "2. Zero hunger", "Soil organic matter", "Soil Fertility", "Conventional tillage", "Geography", "Life Sciences", "Agriculture", "04 agricultural and veterinary sciences", "Soil Nutrient Management", "15. Life on land", "Agronomy", "Chemistry", "Archaeology", "13. Climate action", "0401 agriculture", " forestry", " and fisheries", "Organic matter", "Intercropping in Agricultural Systems", "Soil Carbon Dynamics and Nutrient Cycling in Ecosystems", "Agronomy and Crop Science", "Mathematics"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/2807448259"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Agriculture%2C%20Ecosystems%20%26amp%3B%20Environment", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "2807448259", "name": "item", "description": "2807448259", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/2807448259"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2018-10-01T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "2164/20743", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"license": "Open Access", "updated": "2026-06-25T16:32:45Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2023-04-07", "title": "A Review of Permanent Grassland Grazing Management Practices and the Impacts on Principal Soil Quality Indicators", "description": "<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><article><p>Grasslands are at risk of degradation due to unsustainable management practices and climate change. Sustainable grassland soil management can promote ecosystem service delivery and improve the resilience of the entire grassland ecosystem to anthropogenic change. Here, we re-view the principal soil quality indicators (SQIs) and how they have been used to evaluate the sustainability of different grassland management practices globally. We then discuss sustainable grazing management practices, before reviewing some novel grassland species which may im-prove grassland resilience with relevance for grassland management in Europe and the UK. We also give an overview of current sustainable grassland management methods and their assessment at field scale. From this, we suggest that sustainable Grazing Management Plans (GMPs), together with the testing of drought-resistant grass species and appropriate SQIs monitoring, is key to increasing resilience of grassland ecosystems to anthropogenic change.</p></article>", "keywords": ["2. Zero hunger", "330", "S", "QH301 Biology", "soil quality indicators; grazing management; ecosystem services; permanent grasslands; management practices", "Agriculture", "15. Life on land", "12. Responsible consumption", "Permanent grasslands", "permanent grasslands", "QH301", "Soil quality indicators", "13. Climate action", "SDG 13 - Climate Action", "agricultural_science_and_agronomy_16", "management practices", "Ecosystem services", "Grazing management", "soil quality indicators", "grazing management", "ecosystem services"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://iris.unito.it/bitstream/2318/1910970/1/A53%20Grassland%20erosion%20Agronomy.pdf"}, {"href": "https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/13/5/1366/pdf"}, {"href": "https://doi.org/2164/20743"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Agronomy", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "2164/20743", "name": "item", "description": "2164/20743", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/2164/20743"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2023-04-06T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "3036384722", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"license": "Open Access", "updated": "2026-06-25T16:33:33Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2020-06-22", "title": "The effect of crop residues, cover crops, manures and nitrogen fertilization on soil organic carbon changes in agroecosystems: a synthesis of reviews", "description": "Abstract<p>International initiatives are emphasizing the capture of atmospheric CO2 in soil organic C (SOC) to reduce the climatic footprint from agroecosystems. One approach to quantify the contribution of management practices towards that goal is through analysis of long-term experiments (LTEs). Our objectives were to analyze knowledge gained in literature reviews on SOC changes in LTEs, to evaluate the results regarding interactions with pedo-climatological factors, and to discuss disparities among reviews in data selection criteria. We summarized mean response ratios (RRs) and stock change rate (SCR) effect size indices from twenty reviews using paired comparisons (N). The highest RRs were found with manure applications (30%, N\uffe2\uff80\uff89=\uffe2\uff80\uff89418), followed by aboveground crop residue retention and the use of cover crops (9\uffe2\uff80\uff9310%, N\uffe2\uff80\uff89=\uffe2\uff80\uff89995 and 129), while the effect of nitrogen fertilization was lowest (6%, N\uffe2\uff80\uff89=\uffe2\uff80\uff89846). SCR for nitrogen fertilization exceeded that for aboveground crop residue retention (233 versus 117\uffc2\uffa0kg\uffc2\uffa0C\uffc2\uffa0ha\uffe2\uff88\uff921\uffc2\uffa0year\uffe2\uff88\uff921, N\uffe2\uff80\uff89=\uffe2\uff80\uff89183 and 279) and was highest for manure applications and cover crops (409 and 331\uffc2\uffa0kg\uffc2\uffa0C\uffc2\uffa0ha\uffe2\uff88\uff921\uffc2\uffa0year\uffe2\uff88\uff921, N\uffe2\uff80\uff89=\uffe2\uff80\uff89217 and 176). When data allows, we recommend calculating both RR and SCR because it improves the interpretation. Our synthesis shows that results are not always consistent among reviews and that interaction with texture and climate remain inconclusive. Selection criteria for study durations are highly variable, resulting in irregular conclusions for the effect of time on changes in SOC. We also discuss the relationships of SOC changes with yield and cropping systems, as well as conceptual problems when scaling-up results obtained from field studies to regional levels.</p", "keywords": ["Carbon sequestration", "DYNAMICS", "Management practices", "Environmental Sciences & Ecology", "SEQUESTRATION", "4104 Environmental management", "Stock change rates", "MANAGEMENT", "STOCKS", "Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences", "AGRICULTURAL SOILS", "0502 Environmental Science and Management", "S Agriculture (General)", "Agricultural Science", "METAANALYSIS", "TILLAGE", "2. Zero hunger", "Science & Technology", "CLIMATE-CHANGE", "Soil organic carbon", "Relative response ratio", "04 agricultural and veterinary sciences", "15. Life on land", "LONG", "Meta-analysis", "0501 Ecological Applications", "13. Climate action", "0401 agriculture", " forestry", " and fisheries", "Life Sciences & Biomedicine", "MATTER", "Environmental Sciences"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://pub.epsilon.slu.se/17675/1/bolinder_m_a_et_al_200930.pdf"}, {"href": "https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11027-020-09916-3.pdf"}, {"href": "https://rau.repository.guildhe.ac.uk/id/eprint/16409/1/Bolinder2020_Article_TheEffectOfCropResiduesCoverCr.pdf"}, {"href": "https://doi.org/3036384722"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Mitigation%20and%20Adaptation%20Strategies%20for%20Global%20Change", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "3036384722", "name": "item", "description": "3036384722", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/3036384722"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2020-06-22T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "3180054127", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"license": "Open Access", "updated": "2026-06-25T16:33:48Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2021-07-07", "title": "Impacts of agronomic measures on crop, soil, and environmental indicators: A review and synthesis of meta-analysis", "description": "Abstract   Sustainable agricultural management implies optimization of resources for crop production while minimizing adverse impacts on the environment. This requires a better understanding of the synergies and trade-offs of agronomic management while accounting for the controlling effects of site-specific factors (covariates). We systematically evaluated 113 meta-analytical studies assessing impacts of crop management measures (rotation, cover cropping, residue retention), soil and water measures (irrigation, tillage), soil amendments (enhanced efficiency, biochar), fertilizer use (organic, mineral, combined organic-mineral) and \u201c4R'\u201d fertilizer strategies (right source, rate, timing, placement) on sustainability indicators. These indicators include crop yield, crop N and P (content, uptake, and use efficiency), soil quality indicators (soil organic C, N and P contents, compaction), soil emissions of ammonia (NH3) and greenhouse gases (CO2, N2O), and nutrient losses to water (N and P surplus or leaching). Nutrient management, including 4R practices as well as enhanced efficiency amendments, had the largest impact, increasing crop yields and N uptake while reducing N2O and NH3 emissions as well as N surplus, whereas effects on CO2 emissions were variable. Although all measures positively impacted soil C, the largest effect was due to biochar, followed by organic fertilizer input. Biochar positively impacted crop yield, diminished N2O and NH3 emissions as well as N surplus, and increased CO2 emissions. Within crop management, only cover cropping had a significant positive effect on crop yield, while both cover crops and rotation slightly enhanced N uptake and the sequestration of C and N in soil, thus reducing N2O emissions and N surplus. Minimal tillage practices generally increased SOC, while results for crop yield, N surplus and N2O emissions were variable. Site-specific factors had substantial impacts on the evaluated impacts of measures, most importantly climate, crop type, soil texture, soil pH, soil organic C, N dose, and experimental duration. Considering the variation among meta-analytical protocols followed, we recommend that field studies and meta-analytical work adhere to harmonized guidelines with respect to the reporting of site-level data, experimental design, and the statistical procedures used. This will ensure data comparability between studies, improve the quality of meta-analysis results, and give better insights into currently uncertain or unknown impacts of agronomic measures.", "keywords": ["2. Zero hunger", "0301 basic medicine", "Soil organic carbon", "Management practices", "Agronomic indicators", "Review", "04 agricultural and veterinary sciences", "15. Life on land", "12. Responsible consumption", "Meta-analysis", "03 medical and health sciences", "Emissions", "13. Climate action", "Nutrient use efficiency", "0401 agriculture", " forestry", " and fisheries", "Crop yield", "Nutrient surplus"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/3180054127"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Agriculture%2C%20Ecosystems%20%26amp%3B%20Environment", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "3180054127", "name": "item", "description": "3180054127", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/3180054127"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2021-10-01T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "4aab35b54d6a200219ab296aac160b4a", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-06-25T16:34:33Z", "type": "Other", "title": "Managing water scarcity European and Chinese cropping systems", "description": "Welcome and general introduction by Project Coordinator Jose Alfonso Gomez Calero, IAS-CSIC:      -Actual potential of tree deficit irrigation, sensorization and differentiated spatial management for optimizing water use under droughts. Speaker: Juan Jose Alarc\u00f3n. CEBAS-CSIC      -Actual potential of conservation agriculture and green cover crops in the rotation for optimizing soil water retention in annual crops. Speaker: Tomas Dostal. CVTU      -Cost Benefit Analysis and carbon/water footprint for specific agricultural systems across countries and farm typologies. Speaker: Gianni Quaranta.   UNIBAS, MEDES.      -Regional crop modelling for evaluating water use in agriculture. Speaker: Gabrielle de Lannoy. KU Leuven      -Training and cooperation in large EU China projects, lessons learned. Speaker: Ian Dodd.  ULANC      -Key policy recommendations from SHui. Speaker: Rossana Salvia. UNIBAS, MEDES       Round Table:      Future of optimization of water use in agriculture. Drivers and identification of gaps in knowledge and implementation.      Moderator: Jose Alfonso Gomez Calero. IAS-CSIC      Participants: Miguel Barnuevo. Union de Peque\u00f1os Agricultores; Tim Hess. Cranfield University; Dirk Raes. KU Leuven and M\u00aa Ferrer. FENACORE. SHui (Soil Hydrology research platform underpinning innovation) ran from September 2018 to August 2022 to address best use of soil and water in European and Chinese cropping systems via transdisciplinary research from plot to regional scales. Combining long-term experiments and modelling analysis at different scales evaluated the impact of Best Management Practices (BMPs) on water-limited crop productivity and soil retention, including socio-economic issues. The project also developed tools to facilitate implementation of soil and water saving technologies in specific farming situations. The objective of this in-person meeting in Brussels is to present the main project findings to stakeholders and policy makers, as well as to discuss in a round table the issues related to use of scarce water resources in agriculture. This project is co-funded by the European Commission within H2020 Framework Programme (Project: 773903). This project is co-funded by the Chinese Ministry of Science & Technology under CFM (China-EU Co-Funding Mechanism) Peer reviewed", "keywords": ["2. Zero hunger", "Conservation agriculture", "Cover crops", "Cropping systems", "Best Management Practices", "Water use efficiency", "SHui", "15. Life on land", "Remote sensing", "6. Clean water", "EU-China engagement", "13. Climate action", "Tree deficit irrigation", "Crop modeling", "Precision irrigation"], "contacts": [{"organization": "G\u00f3mez Calero, Jos\u00e9 Alfonso, Alarc\u00f3n Caba\u00f1ero, Juan Jos\u00e9, Intrigliolo, Diego S., Dost\u00e1l, Tom\u00e1\u0161, Quaranta, Gianni, Lannoy, Gabrielle de, Dodd, Ian C., Salvia, Rossana,", "roles": ["creator"]}]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/4aab35b54d6a200219ab296aac160b4a"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "4aab35b54d6a200219ab296aac160b4a", "name": "item", "description": "4aab35b54d6a200219ab296aac160b4a", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/4aab35b54d6a200219ab296aac160b4a"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2022-01-01T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "oai:digital.csic.es:10261/279377", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-06-25T16:44:39Z", "type": "Other", "title": "Managing water scarcity European and Chinese cropping systems", "description": "Open AccessPeer reviewed", "keywords": ["2. Zero hunger", "Conservation agriculture", "Cover crops", "Cropping systems", "Best Management Practices", "Water use efficiency", "SHui", "15. Life on land", "Remote sensing", "6. Clean water", "EU-China engagement", "13. Climate action", "Tree deficit irrigation", "Crop modeling", "Precision irrigation"], "contacts": [{"organization": "G\u00f3mez Calero, Jos\u00e9 Alfonso, Alarc\u00f3n Caba\u00f1ero, Juan Jos\u00e9, Intrigliolo, Diego S., Dost\u00e1l, Tom\u00e1\u0161, Quaranta, Gianni, Lannoy, Gabrielle de, Dodd, Ian C., Salvia, Rossana,", "roles": ["creator"]}]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/oai:digital.csic.es:10261/279377"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "oai:digital.csic.es:10261/279377", "name": "item", "description": "oai:digital.csic.es:10261/279377", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/oai:digital.csic.es:10261/279377"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2022-01-01T00:00:00Z"}}], "links": [{"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "This document as GeoJSON", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items?keywords=Management+practices&f=json", "hreflang": "en-US"}, {"rel": "alternate", "type": "text/html", "title": "This document as HTML", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items?keywords=Management+practices&f=html", "hreflang": "en-US"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection URL", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main", "hreflang": "en-US"}, {"type": "application/geo+json", "rel": "first", "title": "items (first)", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items?keywords=Management+practices&", "hreflang": "en-US"}, {"rel": "last", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "items (last)", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items?keywords=Management+practices&offset=20", "hreflang": "en-US"}], "numberMatched": 20, "numberReturned": 20, "distributedFeatures": [], "timeStamp": "2026-06-25T19:06:38.217514Z"}