{"type": "FeatureCollection", "features": [{"id": "10.1007/s44187-025-00387-6", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-04-04T16:15:27Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2025-04-28", "title": "Landscape of policies, standards, approaches, and projects for EU food security: an overview", "description": "Abstract This review presents a comprehensive examination of the European Union's (EU) multifaceted approach to food security, focusing on the policies, standards, practices, initiatives, and national adaptations that drive the EU's food system resilience. Through frameworks such as the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), Farm to Fork Strategy, and Food 2030, the EU has emphasized sustainable agriculture, supply chain resilience, and equitable access to food across its member states, ensuring food security while maintaining rigorous food safety standards. However, while these policies promote sustainability and supply chain resilience, their effectiveness is hindered by regulatory complexities, economic disparities, and compliance burdens on small-scale producers. This review also explores international and regional standards, including ISO and Codex Alimentarius, which uphold food safety and quality across diverse supply chains. National and local practices in countries like Austria and Finland illustrate how EU objectives are tailored to meet specific regional needs, emphasizing a flexible approach. EU-funded projects focused on food waste reduction, digital innovation, and climate resilience provide practical insights into implementing these policies and advancing the EU's long-term food security goals. By enhancing cross-regional collaboration, investing in digital tools, and addressing disparities in implementation capacity, the EU can further strengthen the adaptability and resilience of its food system, ensuring secure, sustainable, and affordable access to food for all citizens amid global challenges.", "keywords": ["Farm-to-fork strategy", "Resilience", "Sustainability", "Nutrition. Foods and food supply", "EU policy", "TX341-641", "Food security", "Supply chain"], "contacts": [{"organization": "Charis M. Galanakis, Markos I. Daskalakis, Ioannis M. Galanakis, Maryna Nehrey, Maria Spanou, Anna Vetsou, Anastasia Chalkidou, Evita Agrafioti,", "roles": ["creator"]}]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s44187-025-00387-6"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Discover%20Food", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.1007/s44187-025-00387-6", "name": "item", "description": "10.1007/s44187-025-00387-6", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.1007/s44187-025-00387-6"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2025-04-28T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100732", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-04-04T16:16:39Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2023-08-07", "title": "Aeromycological studies in the crops of the main cereals: A systematic review", "description": "Open AccessLes \u00e9tudes a\u00e9romycologiques sur les cultures c\u00e9r\u00e9ali\u00e8res permettent de d\u00e9terminer la variation temporelle des agents pathog\u00e8nes des plantes affectant la culture et de d\u00e9terminer le moment appropri\u00e9 pour appliquer les fongicides. Cependant, ce sujet n'a pas \u00e9t\u00e9 syst\u00e9matiquement revu. L'objectif de ce travail \u00e9tait d'analyser syst\u00e9matiquement toutes les \u00e9tudes a\u00e9romycologiques r\u00e9alis\u00e9es sur le ma\u00efs, le bl\u00e9, le riz, l'avoine, l'orge, le seigle, le sorgho et le millet. Une recherche syst\u00e9matique a \u00e9t\u00e9 effectu\u00e9e dans Scopus depuis le d\u00e9but de la base de donn\u00e9es jusqu'au 1er ao\u00fbt 2022. Les crit\u00e8res d'inclusion \u00e9taient qu'il s'agissait d'\u00e9tudes a\u00e9romycologiques sur le bl\u00e9 ou le riz ou le ma\u00efs ou l'avoine ou le sorgho ou le seigle ou l'orge ou le millet et d'\u00e9tudes publi\u00e9es dans des revues \u00e0 comit\u00e9 de lecture index\u00e9es dans Journal Citation Reports et r\u00e9dig\u00e9es en anglais ou en espagnol. Quarante-trois \u00e9tudes (21 sur le bl\u00e9, 15 sur le riz, 5 sur le ma\u00efs, 1 sur le sorgho et 2 sur l'orge) r\u00e9pondant \u00e0 tous les crit\u00e8res d'\u00e9ligibilit\u00e9 ont \u00e9t\u00e9 incluses (une des \u00e9tudes sur le ma\u00efs a \u00e9galement \u00e9t\u00e9 men\u00e9e sur le bl\u00e9). Aucune \u00e9tude a\u00e9romycologique n'a \u00e9t\u00e9 trouv\u00e9e chez l'avoine, le seigle et le millet. Il a \u00e9t\u00e9 not\u00e9 que la plupart des recherches a\u00e9romycologiques ont \u00e9t\u00e9 men\u00e9es sur les cultures de bl\u00e9 et principalement dans les pays des Am\u00e9riques. De plus, les propagules fongiques sont principalement collect\u00e9es par des m\u00e9thodes non viables, en utilisant divers types de collecteurs. En g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, les \u00e9tudes visaient \u00e0 identifier un agent pathog\u00e8ne sp\u00e9cifique et non \u00e0 la diversit\u00e9 des agents pathog\u00e8nes qui peuvent \u00eatre trouv\u00e9s. La relation des champignons identifi\u00e9s avec les param\u00e8tres m\u00e9t\u00e9orologiques \u00e9tait variable dans les diff\u00e9rentes \u00e9tudes. Cette revue syst\u00e9matique permet de r\u00e9sumer les \u00e9tudes a\u00e9romycologiques qui ont \u00e9t\u00e9 men\u00e9es sur les cultures de bl\u00e9, de riz, de ma\u00efs, de sorgho et d'orge. Il sugg\u00e8re \u00e9galement o\u00f9 les futures \u00e9tudes dans ce domaine devraient \u00eatre dirig\u00e9es, en fonction des limites rencontr\u00e9es.", "keywords": ["Impacts of Elevated CO2 and Ozone on Plant Physiology", "Agriculture (General)", "Health", " Toxicology and Mutagenesis", "Plant Science", "Crop", "S1-972", "Agricultural and Biological Sciences", "Barley", "Biochemistry", " Genetics and Molecular Biology", "TX341-641", "10. No inequality", "Biology", "Sorghum", "2. Zero hunger", "Corn", "Airborne spores", "Nutrition. Foods and food supply", "Life Sciences", "Phylogenetic Analysis", "Cell Biology", "15. Life on land", "2414.06 Hongos", "Agronomy", "3. Good health", "Wheat", "Environmental Science", "Physical Sciences", "Rice", "Indoor Air Quality and Health Effects", "Diversity and Evolution of Fungal Pathogens", "Biotechnology"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100732"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Journal%20of%20Agriculture%20and%20Food%20Research", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100732", "name": "item", "description": "10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100732", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100732"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2023-12-01T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.1038/s41538-021-00087-2", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-04-04T16:17:58Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2020-09-12", "title": "Microbiome-based environmental monitoring of a dairy processing facility highlights the challenges associated with low microbial-load samples.", "description": "Abstract

Food processing environments can harbor microorganisms responsible for food spoilage or foodborne disease. Efficient and accurate identification of microorganisms throughout the food chain can allow the identification of sources of contamination and the timely implementation of control measures. Currently, microbial monitoring of the food chain relies heavily on culture-based techniques. These assays are determined on the microbes expected to be present in the environment, and thus do not cater for unexpected contaminants. Many culture-based assays are also unable to distinguish between undesirable taxa and closely related harmless species. Furthermore, even when multiple culture-based approaches are used in parallel, it is still not possible to comprehensively characterize the entire microbiology of a food-chain sample.

High throughput DNA sequencing represents a potential means through which microbial monitoring of the food chain can be enhanced. While sequencing platforms, such as the Illumina MiSeq, NextSeq and NovaSeq, are most typically found in research or commercial sequencing laboratories, newer portable platforms, such as the Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) MinION, offer the potential for rapid analysis of food chain microbiomes. In this study, having initially assessed the ability of rapid MinION-based sequencing to discriminate between different microbes within a simple mock metagenomic mixture of related food spoilage, spore-forming microorganisms. Subsequently, we proceeded to compare the performance of both ONT and Illumina sequencing for environmental monitoring of an active food processing facility.

Overall, ONT MinION sequencing provided accurate classification to species level, which was comparable to Illumina-derived outputs. However, while the MinION-based approach provided a means of easy library preparations and portability, the high concentrations of DNA needed to run the rapid sequencing protocols was a limiting factor, requiring the random amplification of template DNA in order to generate sufficient material for analysis.

", "keywords": ["0301 basic medicine", "2. Zero hunger", "03 medical and health sciences", "Nutrition. Foods and food supply", "13. Climate action", "0206 medical engineering", "TX341-641", "Metagenomics", "02 engineering and technology", "Food microbiology", "TP368-456", "Food processing and manufacture", "Article"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41538-021-00087-2.pdf"}, {"href": "https://doi.org/10.1038/s41538-021-00087-2"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/npj%20Science%20of%20Food", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.1038/s41538-021-00087-2", "name": "item", "description": "10.1038/s41538-021-00087-2", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.1038/s41538-021-00087-2"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2020-09-11T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.1080/10942912.2020.1716796", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-04-04T16:18:31Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2020-01-23", "title": "Antioxidant activity, nutritional, and phenolic composition of sweet potato leaves as affected by harvesting period", "description": "In the present study, the nutritional and phenolic composition as well as the antioxidant activity of sweet potato leaves (SPL) harvested in 3 different periods were determined and compared. Furthermore, gray relational analysis was used to compare the comprehensive nutritional value. Results showed SPL HP1 had the highest protein value (30.8 \u00b1 0.4 g/100 g dw), while SPL HP3 had the highest content of vitamin C (104.6 \u00b1 4.9 mg/100 g dw), vitamin E (5.8 \u00b1 0.4 mg/100 g dw), total polyphenol content (9.1 \u00b1 0.3 g/100 g dw), antioxidant activity (DPPH: 7.4 \u00b1 0.1 g VcE/100 g dw; ABTS: 10.6 \u00b1 0.7 g VcE/100 g dw; FRAP: 0.617 \u00b1 0.005 \u00b5mol TroloxE/100 g dw), and comprehensive nutritional value (weighted gray relational grade 0.8336). The individual phenolic composition showed the presence of six caffeoylquinic acids, caffeic acid, and two flavonoids (quercetin and isoquercetin), which were significantly different among different harvest periods. In conclusion, HP3 was an optimal period for harvesting SPL.", "keywords": ["nutritional composition", "antioxidant activity", "Harvest period", "NUTRITIONAL COMPOSITION", "Food processing and manufacture", "HARVEST PERIOD", "Phenolic composition", "0404 agricultural biotechnology", "Antioxidant activity", "TX341-641", "https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2", "Sweet potato leaves", "2. Zero hunger", "harvest period", "Nutrition. Foods and food supply", "Qu\u00edmica", "04 agricultural and veterinary sciences", "TP368-456", "PHENOLIC COMPOSITION", "sweet potato leaves", "Nutritional composition", "SWEET POTATO LEAVES", "https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.11", "0405 other agricultural sciences", "ANTIOXIDANT ACTIVITY", "phenolic composition"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10942912.2020.1716796"}, {"href": "https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2020.1716796"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/International%20Journal%20of%20Food%20Properties", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.1080/10942912.2020.1716796", "name": "item", "description": "10.1080/10942912.2020.1716796", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.1080/10942912.2020.1716796"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2020-01-01T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.1186/s40100-019-0133-9", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-04-04T16:19:41Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2019-07-14", "title": "Partnering for sustainability in agri-food supply chains: the case of Barilla Sustainable Farming in the Po Valley", "description": "Abstract The objective of the paper is to understand the process of designing a multi-stakeholder partnership in the adoption of sustainable innovations in value chains. More specifically, the focus is on the design of feasible types of horizontal agreements and contractual formulas to be implemented in the agri-food supply chain in order to introduce sustainable agricultural practices. To this purpose, the Barilla Sustainable Farming initiative, which is currently in the first phase of designing an MSP, is used as a case study.", "keywords": ["HD9000-9495", "2. Zero hunger", "330", "ddc:330", "Nutrition. Foods and food supply", "05 social sciences", "Supply chain protocols", "Horizontal agreements", "Agricultural industries", "Contract design", "01 natural sciences", "12. Responsible consumption", "Sustainability", "Crop rotation", "11. Sustainability", "0502 economics and business", "TX341-641", "0105 earth and related environmental sciences"]}, "links": [{"href": "http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s40100-019-0133-9.pdf"}, {"href": "https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-019-0133-9"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Agricultural%20and%20Food%20Economics", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.1186/s40100-019-0133-9", "name": "item", "description": "10.1186/s40100-019-0133-9", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.1186/s40100-019-0133-9"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2019-07-14T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.3389/fsufs.2020.00115", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-04-04T16:21:13Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2020-08-21", "title": "A Decision Support Model for Assessing the Water Regulation and Purification Potential of Agricultural Soils Across Europe", "description": "Water regulation and purification (WR) function is defined as \u201cthe capacity of the soil to remove harmful compounds and the capacity of the soil to receive, store and conduct water for subsequent use and to prevent droughts, flooding and erosion.\u201d It is a crucial function that society expects agricultural soils to deliver, contributing to quality water supply for human needs and in particular for ensuring food security. The complexity of processes involved and the intricate tradeoff with other necessary soil functions requires decision support tools for best management of WR function. However, the effects of farm and soil management practices on the delivery of the WR function has not been fully addressed by decision support tools for farmers. This work aimed to develop a decision support model for the management of the WR function performed by agricultural soils. The specific objectives of this paper were (i) to construct a qualitative decision support model to assess the water regulation and purification capacity of agricultural soils at field level, to (ii) conduct sensitivity analysis of the model; and (iii) to validate the model with independent empirical data. The developed decision support model for WR is a hierarchical qualitative model with 5 levels and has 27 basic attributes describing the soil (S), environment (E), and management (M) attributes of the field site to be assessed. The WR model is composed of 3 sub-models concerning (1) soil water storage, (2) P and sediment loss in runoff, and (3) N leaching in percolating water. The WR decision support model was validated using a representative dataset of 94 field sites from across Europe and had an overall accuracy of 75% when compared to the empirically derived values across these sites. This highly accurate, reliable, and useful decision support model for assessing the capacity of agricultural soils to perform the WR function can be used by farmers and advisors help manage and protect their soil resources for the future. This model has also been incorporated into the Soil Navigator decision support tool which provides simultaneous assessment of the WR function and other important soil functions for agriculture.", "keywords": ["2. Zero hunger", "decision support tool", "Nutrition. Foods and food supply", "food security", "04 agricultural and veterinary sciences", "soil functions", "TP368-456", "15. Life on land", "water quality", "01 natural sciences", "INCREASE", "Food processing and manufacture", "6. Clean water", "climate change", "13. Climate action", "EXTREME EVENTS", "water regulation", "11. Sustainability", "MANAGEMENT", "0401 agriculture", " forestry", " and fisheries", "TX341-641", "water purification", "0105 earth and related environmental sciences"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00115"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Frontiers%20in%20Sustainable%20Food%20Systems", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.3389/fsufs.2020.00115", "name": "item", "description": "10.3389/fsufs.2020.00115", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00115"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2020-08-21T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.3389/fsufs.2022.937802", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-04-04T16:21:13Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2022-08-04", "title": "European Union's policymaking on sustainable waste management and circularity in agroecosystems: The potential for innovative interactions between science and decision-making", "description": "

The European Economic Community (EEC) and later the European Union (EU) have issued policies on waste during the last 50 years. This paper aims at analyzing EEC and EU's policymaking on waste management and circularity in agroecosystems as compared with other sectors of waste management (e.g., municipal, industrial, construction waste, etc.). Even if founded on the same general principles, and especially the precautionary principle, policymaking on waste and by-product management in agroecosystems differs from waste management in other sectors. In particular, agricultural waste management has been excluded from the European Waste Framework Directive, from its start in 1975 to this day. The issue of waste and by-products in agroecosystems has been addressed in multiple Directives and Regulations, historically aiming at reducing the potential negative impacts of residual organic matter application in agriculture. In the last decade, the swiftly growing interest for circular economy has triggered a breakthrough in traditional waste management, potentially affecting all economic sectors and enforcing systemic perspectives rather than more conventional \u201csilo\u201d approaches. Circularity in agroecosystems should thus become a major subject of EU's policymaking, but may suffer from its lack of a general framework, contrary to waste in other sectors. Moreover, agricultural valorization of urban residual organic streams may face several roadblocks in between differing legislations for agroecosystems and for \u201cnon-agricultural\u201d systems. A systemic approach of the question of residual matter in agroecosystems, backing a strong policymaking framework for the sector, would be necessary in this context. Science-policymaking interactions are necessary to tackle these issues and should take innovative forms to address their complexity. Policy briefs, Policy Labs and the new European Commission Scientific Advice Mechanism represent existing innovative tools to take the topic of policymaking for sustainable waste management and circularity in agroecosystems forward.

", "keywords": ["[SDE] Environmental Sciences", "2. Zero hunger", "organic waste agricultural waste by-product valorization waste management circular economy bioeconomy policymaking European Union", "330", "Nutrition. Foods and food supply", "circular economy", "05 social sciences", "TP368-456", "01 natural sciences", "7. Clean energy", "Food processing and manufacture", "12. Responsible consumption", "by-product valorization", "13. Climate action", "[SDE]Environmental Sciences", "0502 economics and business", "11. Sustainability", "policymaking", "waste management", "TX341-641", "European Union", "agricultural waste", "bioeconomy", "organic waste", "0105 earth and related environmental sciences"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.937802"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Frontiers%20in%20Sustainable%20Food%20Systems", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.3389/fsufs.2022.937802", "name": "item", "description": "10.3389/fsufs.2022.937802", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.3389/fsufs.2022.937802"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2022-08-04T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.3389/fsufs.2024.1272332", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-04-04T16:21:13Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2024-08-15", "title": "Linking drivers of food insecurity and ecosystem services in Africa", "description": "

Food insecurity is a multidimensional and intricate problem, known to have significant implications for individuals, communities, and countries worldwide. Africa has become the continent that is experiencing this uncertainty the most. Food Security (FS) encompasses several aspects such as availability, accessibility, nutrient use, and supply system stability with time and, more recently, other obliges to governance/agency and sustainability. Knowing the interconnection between these aspects and the Ecosystems Services (ES) and understanding the relationship and interactions between FS and ES is important. Moreover, this knowledge may contribute to supporting policies that promote long-term sustainable and secure food systems. Hereby, a conceptual framework is presented, that examines interactions between food insecurity drivers and ecosystem change drivers and the combined influence on ES. Our review further introduces existing trade-offs between ES on account of agricultural intensification vs. key existing strategies to promote sustainable agricultural production. These strategies include climate-smart agriculture, sustainably managed land, and effective handling of water resources. In the end, the potential of Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES), as a suitable approach to ensuring these strategies are adopted, especially in African countries where sustainable financial incentives are currently under-explored is discussed. In resume, this review aims to make a conceptual contribution to understanding how drivers of food insecurity influence drivers of ecosystem changes, the impact of these influences on the services of ecosystems, and how sustainable agro approaches and PES introduction can help to reduce such negative impacts.

", "keywords": ["2. Zero hunger", "0301 basic medicine", "0303 health sciences", "Nutrition. Foods and food supply", "1. No poverty", "food security", "TP368-456", "15. Life on land", "Food processing and manufacture", "12. Responsible consumption", "03 medical and health sciences", "13. Climate action", "sustainable agriculture intensification", "smallholder farmers", "TX341-641", "payment for ecosystem services", "climate change adaptation"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2024.1272332"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Frontiers%20in%20Sustainable%20Food%20Systems", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.3389/fsufs.2024.1272332", "name": "item", "description": "10.3389/fsufs.2024.1272332", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.3389/fsufs.2024.1272332"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2024-08-15T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.3389/fsufs.2024.1410205", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-04-04T16:21:13Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2024-08-26", "title": "Building a solid foundation: advancing evidence synthesis in agri-food systems science", "description": "

Enhancing the reliability of literature reviews and evidence synthesis is crucial for advancing the transformation of agriculture and food (agri-food) systems as well as for informed decisions and policy making. In this perspective, we argue that evidence syntheses in the field of agri-food systems research often suffer from a suite of methodological limitations that substantially increase the risk of bias, i.e., publication and selection bias, resulting in unreliable and potentially flawed conclusions and, consequently, poor decisions (e.g., policy direction, investment, research foci). We assessed 926 articles from the Collaboration for Environmental Evidence Database of Evidence Reviews (CEEDER) and recent examples from agri-food systems research to support our reasoning. The analysis of articles from CEEDER (n\uffe2\uff80\uff89=\uffe2\uff80\uff89926) specifically indicates poor quality (Red) in measures to minimize subjectivity during critical appraisal (98% of all reviews), application of the eligibility criteria (97%), cross-checking of extracted data by more than one reviewer (97%), critical appraisal of studies (88%), establishment of an a priori method/protocol (86%), and transparent reporting of eligibility decisions (65%). Additionally, deficiencies (Amber) were found in most articles (>50%) regarding the investigation and discussion of variability in study findings (89%), comprehensiveness of the search (78%), definition of eligibility criteria (72%), search approach (64%), reporting of extracted data for each study (59%), consideration and discussion of the limitations of the synthesis (56%), documentation of data extraction (54%) and regarding the statistical approach (52%). To enhance the quality of evidence synthesis in agri-food science, review authors should use tried-and-tested methodologies and publish peer-reviewed a priori protocols. Training in evidence synthesis methods should be scaled, with universities playing a crucial role. It is the shared duty of research authors, training providers, supervisors, reviewers, and editors to ensure that rigorous and robust evidence syntheses are made available to decision-makers. We argue that all these actors should be cognizant of these common mistakes to avoid publishing unreliable syntheses. Only by thinking as a community can we ensure that reliable evidence is provided to support appropriate decision-making in agri-food systems science.Enhancing the reliability of literature reviews and evidence synthesis is crucial for advancing the transformation of agriculture and food (agri-food) systems as well as for informed decisions and policy making. In this perspective, we argue that evidence syntheses in the field of agri-food systems research often suffer from a suite of methodological limitations that substantially increase the risk of bias, i.e., publication and selection bias, resulting in unreliable and potentially flawed conclusions and, consequently, poor decisions (e.g., policy direction, investment, research foci). We assessed 926 articles from the Collaboration for Environmental Evidence Database of Evidence Reviews (CEEDER) and recent examples from agri-food systems research to support our reasoning. The analysis of articles from CEEDER (n\uffe2\uff80\uff89=\uffe2\uff80\uff89926) specifically indicates poor quality (Red) in measures to minimize subjectivity during critical appraisal (98% of all reviews), application of the eligibility criteria (97%), cross-checking of extracted data by more than one reviewer (97%), critical appraisal of studies (88%), establishment of an a priori method/protocol (86%), and transparent reporting of eligibility decisions (65%). Additionally, deficiencies (Amber) were found in most articles (>50%) regarding the investigation and discussion of variability in study findings (89%), comprehensiveness of the search (78%), definition of eligibility criteria (72%), search approach (64%), reporting of extracted data for each study (59%), consideration and discussion of the limitations of the synthesis (56%), documentation of data extraction (54%) and regarding the statistical approach (52%). To enhance the quality of evidence synthesis in agri-food science, review authors should use tried-and-tested methodologies and publish peer-reviewed a priori protocols. Training in evidence synthesis methods should be scaled, with universities playing a crucial role. It is the shared duty of research authors, training providers, supervisors, reviewers, and editors to ensure that rigorous and robust evidence syntheses are made available to decision-makers. We argue that all these actors should be cognizant of these common mistakes to avoid publishing unreliable syntheses. Only by thinking as a community can we ensure that reliable evidence is provided to support appropriate decision-making in agri-food systems science.Enhancing the reliability of literature reviews and evidence synthesis is crucial for advancing the transformation of agriculture and food (agri-food) systems as well as for informed decisions and policy making. In this perspective, we argue that evidence syntheses in the field of agri-food systems research often suffer from a suite of methodological limitations that substantially increase the risk of bias, i.e., publication and selection bias, resulting in unreliable and potentially flawed conclusions and, consequently, poor decisions (e.g., policy direction, investment, research foci). We assessed 926 articles from the Collaboration for Environmental Evidence Database of Evidence Reviews (CEEDER) and recent examples from agri-food systems research to support our reasoning. The analysis of articles from CEEDER (n\uffe2\uff80\uff89=\uffe2\uff80\uff89926) specifically indicates poor quality (Red) in measures to minimize subjectivity during critical appraisal (98% of all reviews), application of the eligibility criteria (97%), cross-checking of extracted data by more than one reviewer (97%), critical appraisal of studies (88%), establishment of an a priori method/protocol (86%), and transparent reporting of eligibility decisions (65%). Additionally, deficiencies (Amber) were found in most articles (>50%) regarding the investigation and discussion of variability in study findings (89%), comprehensiveness of the search (78%), definition of eligibility criteria (72%), search approach (64%), reporting of extracted data for each study (59%), consideration and discussion of the limitations of the synthesis (56%), documentation of data extraction (54%) and regarding the statistical approach (52%). To enhance the quality of evidence synthesis in agri-food science, review authors should use tried-and-tested methodologies and publish peer-reviewed a priori protocols. Training in evidence synthesis methods should be scaled, with universities playing a crucial role. It is the shared duty of research authors, training providers, supervisors, reviewers, and editors to ensure that rigorous and robust evidence syntheses are made available to decision-makers. We argue that all these actors should be cognizant of these common mistakes to avoid publishing unreliable syntheses. Only by thinking as a community can we ensure that reliable evidence is provided to support appropriate decision-making in agri-food systems science.

Food insecurity is a multidimensional and intricate problem, known to have significant implications for individuals, communities, and countries worldwide. Africa has become the continent that is experiencing this uncertainty the most. Food Security (FS) encompasses several aspects such as availability, accessibility, nutrient use, and supply system stability with time and, more recently, other obliges to governance/agency and sustainability. Knowing the interconnection between these aspects and the Ecosystems Services (ES) and understanding the relationship and interactions between FS and ES is important. Moreover, this knowledge may contribute to supporting policies that promote long-term sustainable and secure food systems. Hereby, a conceptual framework is presented, that examines interactions between food insecurity drivers and ecosystem change drivers and the combined influence on ES. Our review further introduces existing trade-offs between ES on account of agricultural intensification vs. key existing strategies to promote sustainable agricultural production. These strategies include climate-smart agriculture, sustainably managed land, and effective handling of water resources. In the end, the potential of Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES), as a suitable approach to ensuring these strategies are adopted, especially in African countries where sustainable financial incentives are currently under-explored is discussed. In resume, this review aims to make a conceptual contribution to understanding how drivers of food insecurity influence drivers of ecosystem changes, the impact of these influences on the services of ecosystems, and how sustainable agro approaches and PES introduction can help to reduce such negative impacts.

", "keywords": ["2. Zero hunger", "0301 basic medicine", "0303 health sciences", "Nutrition. Foods and food supply", "1. No poverty", "food security", "TP368-456", "15. Life on land", "Food processing and manufacture", "12. Responsible consumption", "03 medical and health sciences", "13. Climate action", "sustainable agriculture intensification", "smallholder farmers", "TX341-641", "payment for ecosystem services", "climate change adaptation"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://repositorio.ulisboa.pt/bitstream/10400.5/97452/1/fsufs-08-1272332%20%281%29.pdf"}, {"href": "https://doi.org/10400.5/97452"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Frontiers%20in%20Sustainable%20Food%20Systems", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10400.5/97452", "name": "item", "description": "10400.5/97452", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10400.5/97452"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2024-08-15T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "3081110786", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-04-04T16:26:39Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2020-08-21", "title": "A Decision Support Model for Assessing the Water Regulation and Purification Potential of Agricultural Soils Across Europe", "description": "Water regulation and purification (WR) function is defined as \u201cthe capacity of the soil to remove harmful compounds and the capacity of the soil to receive, store and conduct water for subsequent use and to prevent droughts, flooding and erosion.\u201d It is a crucial function that society expects agricultural soils to deliver, contributing to quality water supply for human needs and in particular for ensuring food security. The complexity of processes involved and the intricate tradeoff with other necessary soil functions requires decision support tools for best management of WR function. However, the effects of farm and soil management practices on the delivery of the WR function has not been fully addressed by decision support tools for farmers. This work aimed to develop a decision support model for the management of the WR function performed by agricultural soils. The specific objectives of this paper were (i) to construct a qualitative decision support model to assess the water regulation and purification capacity of agricultural soils at field level, to (ii) conduct sensitivity analysis of the model; and (iii) to validate the model with independent empirical data. The developed decision support model for WR is a hierarchical qualitative model with 5 levels and has 27 basic attributes describing the soil (S), environment (E), and management (M) attributes of the field site to be assessed. The WR model is composed of 3 sub-models concerning (1) soil water storage, (2) P and sediment loss in runoff, and (3) N leaching in percolating water. The WR decision support model was validated using a representative dataset of 94 field sites from across Europe and had an overall accuracy of 75% when compared to the empirically derived values across these sites. This highly accurate, reliable, and useful decision support model for assessing the capacity of agricultural soils to perform the WR function can be used by farmers and advisors help manage and protect their soil resources for the future. This model has also been incorporated into the Soil Navigator decision support tool which provides simultaneous assessment of the WR function and other important soil functions for agriculture.", "keywords": ["2. Zero hunger", "decision support tool", "Nutrition. Foods and food supply", "food security", "04 agricultural and veterinary sciences", "soil functions", "TP368-456", "15. Life on land", "water quality", "01 natural sciences", "INCREASE", "Food processing and manufacture", "6. Clean water", "climate change", "13. Climate action", "EXTREME EVENTS", "water regulation", "11. Sustainability", "MANAGEMENT", "0401 agriculture", " forestry", " and fisheries", "TX341-641", "water purification", "0105 earth and related environmental sciences"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/3081110786"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Frontiers%20in%20Sustainable%20Food%20Systems", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "3081110786", "name": "item", "description": "3081110786", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/3081110786"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2020-08-21T00:00:00Z"}}], "links": [{"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "This document as GeoJSON", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items?keywords=Nutrition.+Foods+and+food+supply&f=json", "hreflang": "en-US"}, {"rel": "alternate", "type": "text/html", "title": "This document as HTML", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items?keywords=Nutrition.+Foods+and+food+supply&f=html", "hreflang": "en-US"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection URL", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main", "hreflang": "en-US"}, {"type": "application/geo+json", "rel": "first", "title": "items (first)", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items?keywords=Nutrition.+Foods+and+food+supply&", "hreflang": "en-US"}, {"rel": "last", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "items (last)", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items?keywords=Nutrition.+Foods+and+food+supply&offset=13", "hreflang": "en-US"}], "numberMatched": 13, "numberReturned": 13, "distributedFeatures": [], "timeStamp": "2026-04-05T08:50:05.004065Z"}