{"type": "FeatureCollection", "features": [{"id": "10.1111/gcb.16267", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"license": "Open Access", "updated": "2026-09-20T16:17:31Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2022-05-31", "title": "Land\u2010based climate solutions for the United States", "description": "Abstract

Meeting end\uffe2\uff80\uff90of\uffe2\uff80\uff90century global warming targets requires aggressive action on multiple fronts. Recent reports note the futility of addressing mitigation goals without fully engaging the agricultural sector, yet no available assessments combine both nature\uffe2\uff80\uff90based solutions (reforestation, grassland and wetland protection, and agricultural practice change) and cellulosic bioenergy for a single geographic region. Collectively, these solutions might offer a suite of climate, biodiversity, and other benefits greater than either alone. Nature\uffe2\uff80\uff90based solutions are largely constrained by the duration of carbon accrual in soils and forest biomass; each of these carbon pools will eventually saturate. Bioenergy solutions can last indefinitely but carry significant environmental risk if carelessly deployed. We detail a simplified scenario for the United States that illustrates the benefits of combining approaches. We assign a portion of non\uffe2\uff80\uff90forested former cropland to bioenergy sufficient to meet projected mid\uffe2\uff80\uff90century transportation needs, with the remainder assigned to nature\uffe2\uff80\uff90based solutions such as reforestation. Bottom\uffe2\uff80\uff90up mitigation potentials for the aggregate contributions of crop, grazing, forest, and bioenergy lands are assessed by including in a Monte Carlo model conservative ranges for cost\uffe2\uff80\uff90effective local mitigation capacities, together with ranges for (a) areal extents that avoid double counting and include realistic adoption rates and (b) the projected duration of different carbon sinks. The projected duration illustrates the net effect of eventually saturating soil carbon pools in the case of most strategies, and additionally saturating biomass carbon pools in the case of forest management. Results show a conservative end\uffe2\uff80\uff90of\uffe2\uff80\uff90century mitigation capacity of 110 (57\uffe2\uff80\uff93178) Gt CO2e for the U.S., ~50% higher than existing estimates that prioritize nature\uffe2\uff80\uff90based or bioenergy solutions separately. Further research is needed to shrink uncertainties, but there is sufficient confidence in the general magnitude and direction of a combined approach to plan for deployment now.There are a multitude of resistance strategies that microbes can apply to avoid inhibition by antimicrobials. One of these strategies is the enzymatic modification of the antibiotic, in a process generally termed inactivation. Furthermore, some microorganisms may not be limited to the mere inactivation of the antimicrobial compounds. They can continue by further enzymatic degradation of the compounds' carbon backbone, taking nutritional and energetic advantage of the former antibiotic. This driving force to harness an additional food source in a complex environment adds another level of complexity to the reasonably well\uffe2\uff80\uff90understood process of antibiotic resistance proliferation on a single cell level: It brings bioprotection into play at the level of microbial community. Despite the possible implications of a resistant community in a host and a lurking antibiotic failure, knowledge of degradation pathways of antibiotics and their connections is scarce. Currently, it is limited to only a few families of antibiotics (e.g. \uffce\uffb2\uffe2\uff80\uff90lactams and sulfonamides). In this article, we discuss the fluctuating nature of the relationship between antibiotic resistance and the biodegradation of antibiotics. This distinction mainly depends on the genetic background of the microbe, as general resistance genes can be recruited to function in a biodegradation pathway.

", "keywords": ["0301 basic medicine", "2. Zero hunger", "Opinion", "Sulfonamides", "0303 health sciences", "03 medical and health sciences", "Biodegradation", " Environmental", "Bacteria", "Drug Resistance", " Bacterial", "Humans", "beta-Lactams", "Anti-Bacterial Agents"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1462-2920.15018"}, {"href": "https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.15018"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Environmental%20Microbiology", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.1111/1462-2920.15018", "name": "item", "description": "10.1111/1462-2920.15018", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.1111/1462-2920.15018"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2020-04-28T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.1128/mbio.00455-24", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"license": "Open Access", "updated": "2026-09-20T16:17:51Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2024-03-25", "title": "Priorities, opportunities, and challenges for integrating microorganisms into Earth system models for climate change prediction", "description": "ABSTRACT

Climate change jeopardizes human health, global biodiversity, and sustainability of the biosphere. To make reliable predictions about climate change, scientists use Earth system models (ESMs) that integrate physical, chemical, and biological processes occurring on land, the oceans, and the atmosphere. Although critical for catalyzing coupled biogeochemical processes, microorganisms have traditionally been left out of ESMs. Here, we generate a \uffe2\uff80\uff9ctop 10\uffe2\uff80\uff9d list of priorities, opportunities, and challenges for the explicit integration of microorganisms into ESMs. We discuss the need for coarse-graining microbial information into functionally relevant categories, as well as the capacity for microorganisms to rapidly evolve in response to climate-change drivers. Microbiologists are uniquely positioned to collect novel and valuable information necessary for next-generation ESMs, but this requires data harmonization and transdisciplinary collaboration to effectively guide adaptation strategies and mitigation policy.

", "keywords": ["Naturgeografi", "Earth", " Planet", "Climate Change", "Microbiology", "traits", "biogeochemistry", "Humans", "Ecosystem", "Biomedical and Clinical Sciences", "Bacteria", "biogeochemistry; modeling; traits; climate change", "modeling", "Opinion/Hypothesis", "Biodiversity", "Biological Sciences", "Medical microbiology", "Models", " Theoretical", "15. Life on land", "QR1-502", "6. Clean water", "Climate Science", "3. Good health", "Climate Action", "climate change", "Physical Geography", "Medical Microbiology", "13. Climate action", "Biochemistry and cell biology", "Biochemistry and Cell Biology", "Generic health relevance", "Klimatvetenskap"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://journals.asm.org/doi/pdf/10.1128/mbio.00455-24"}, {"href": "https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00455-24"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/mBio", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.1128/mbio.00455-24", "name": "item", "description": "10.1128/mbio.00455-24", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.1128/mbio.00455-24"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2024-05-08T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "20.500.11850/667312", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"license": "Open Access", "updated": "2026-09-20T16:22:15Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2024-03-25", "title": "Priorities, opportunities, and challenges for integrating microorganisms into Earth system models for climate change prediction", "description": "ABSTRACT

Climate change jeopardizes human health, global biodiversity, and sustainability of the biosphere. To make reliable predictions about climate change, scientists use Earth system models (ESMs) that integrate physical, chemical, and biological processes occurring on land, the oceans, and the atmosphere. Although critical for catalyzing coupled biogeochemical processes, microorganisms have traditionally been left out of ESMs. Here, we generate a \uffe2\uff80\uff9ctop 10\uffe2\uff80\uff9d list of priorities, opportunities, and challenges for the explicit integration of microorganisms into ESMs. We discuss the need for coarse-graining microbial information into functionally relevant categories, as well as the capacity for microorganisms to rapidly evolve in response to climate-change drivers. Microbiologists are uniquely positioned to collect novel and valuable information necessary for next-generation ESMs, but this requires data harmonization and transdisciplinary collaboration to effectively guide adaptation strategies and mitigation policy.

", "keywords": ["Naturgeografi", "Earth", " Planet", "Climate Change", "Microbiology", "traits", "biogeochemistry", "Humans", "Ecosystem", "Biomedical and Clinical Sciences", "Bacteria", "biogeochemistry; modeling; traits; climate change", "modeling", "Opinion/Hypothesis", "Biodiversity", "Biological Sciences", "Medical microbiology", "Models", " Theoretical", "15. Life on land", "QR1-502", "6. Clean water", "Climate Science", "3. Good health", "Climate Action", "climate change", "Physical Geography", "Medical Microbiology", "13. Climate action", "Biochemistry and cell biology", "Biochemistry and Cell Biology", "Generic health relevance", "Klimatvetenskap"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://journals.asm.org/doi/pdf/10.1128/mbio.00455-24"}, {"href": "https://doi.org/20.500.11850/667312"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/mBio", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "20.500.11850/667312", "name": "item", "description": "20.500.11850/667312", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/20.500.11850/667312"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2024-05-08T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "1893/18171", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"license": "Open Access", "updated": "2026-09-20T16:22:06Z", "type": "Report", "title": "British Spectators of the French Revolution: the view from across the Channel", "description": "The British public were fascinated by the French Revolution from its outbreak. However, commentary on revolutionary events in France was heavily influenced by British domestic political debates. Most British observers saw what they wanted to see: conservatives saw a worked example of the disadvantages of republicanism, while liberals and radicals were more enthusiastic. The war against France from 1793 intensified the tendency of the British to view the Revolution more in terms of how it affected them than on its own terms.", "keywords": ["Loyalists", "British government", "Radicals", "320", "Public opinion", "French Revolution", "Opposition Whigs"], "contacts": [{"organization": "Macleod, Emma", "roles": ["creator"]}]}, "links": [{"href": "http://dspace.stir.ac.uk/bitstream/1893/18171/1/Macleod%20British%20Spectators%20FR%20final.pdf"}, {"href": "https://doi.org/1893/18171"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "1893/18171", "name": "item", "description": "1893/18171", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/1893/18171"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2013-09-01T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "2164/19500", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-09-20T16:22:23Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2022-05-31", "title": "Land\u2010based climate solutions for the United States", "description": "Abstract

Meeting end\uffe2\uff80\uff90of\uffe2\uff80\uff90century global warming targets requires aggressive action on multiple fronts. Recent reports note the futility of addressing mitigation goals without fully engaging the agricultural sector, yet no available assessments combine both nature\uffe2\uff80\uff90based solutions (reforestation, grassland and wetland protection, and agricultural practice change) and cellulosic bioenergy for a single geographic region. Collectively, these solutions might offer a suite of climate, biodiversity, and other benefits greater than either alone. Nature\uffe2\uff80\uff90based solutions are largely constrained by the duration of carbon accrual in soils and forest biomass; each of these carbon pools will eventually saturate. Bioenergy solutions can last indefinitely but carry significant environmental risk if carelessly deployed. We detail a simplified scenario for the United States that illustrates the benefits of combining approaches. We assign a portion of non\uffe2\uff80\uff90forested former cropland to bioenergy sufficient to meet projected mid\uffe2\uff80\uff90century transportation needs, with the remainder assigned to nature\uffe2\uff80\uff90based solutions such as reforestation. Bottom\uffe2\uff80\uff90up mitigation potentials for the aggregate contributions of crop, grazing, forest, and bioenergy lands are assessed by including in a Monte Carlo model conservative ranges for cost\uffe2\uff80\uff90effective local mitigation capacities, together with ranges for (a) areal extents that avoid double counting and include realistic adoption rates and (b) the projected duration of different carbon sinks. The projected duration illustrates the net effect of eventually saturating soil carbon pools in the case of most strategies, and additionally saturating biomass carbon pools in the case of forest management. Results show a conservative end\uffe2\uff80\uff90of\uffe2\uff80\uff90century mitigation capacity of 110 (57\uffe2\uff80\uff93178) Gt CO2e for the U.S., ~50% higher than existing estimates that prioritize nature\uffe2\uff80\uff90based or bioenergy solutions separately. Further research is needed to shrink uncertainties, but there is sufficient confidence in the general magnitude and direction of a combined approach to plan for deployment now.