{"type": "FeatureCollection", "features": [{"id": "10.1016/j.rse.2016.02.046", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-06-26T16:18:11Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2016-03-05", "title": "Comparison of remote sensing and simulated soil moisture datasets in Mediterranean landscapes", "description": "AbstractThis paper presents the comparison of three global soil moisture products (ASCAT, AMSR and SMOS) versus a land surface model over a region representative of several Mediterranean landscapes located in the Northeast of the Iberian Peninsula. Our approach has been for agricultural and water management applications at the regional and local scale. Despite being a rather small area, we were able to observe different signal behaviours corresponding to major land cover classes in Mediterranean areas i.e.: dryland and irrigated crops, forests and natural vegetation (grass-shrubs). The area also allowed assessing the impact of topography. The first result of the study is that the results are very dependent on the normalizations used to make the data comparable, thus their impact must be carefully analysed. In this study, we applied two different normalisation methods (called ZV35 and ZV) and different moving average windows (1, 10 and 30days) in order to enhance seasonal effects. Using no smoothing window, ASCAT is the soil moisture product that correlates best with the LSM over all cover classes, whatever the method. Using smoothing window, AMSR-E tends to outperform other soil moisture products with the ZV method. The ZV35 method is not able to identify a small heavily irrigated area. The reason for these different results is that ZV35, tends to eliminate the monthly scale soil moisture memory and therefore becomes more sensitive to precipitation and less sensitive to the monthly evolution of superficial soil moisture. The comparison shows in general good agreement for all soil moisture products with the LSM on the temporal series simulated over flat, non irrigated areas which are not close to the sea. SMOS has difficulties in areas close to the sea and in areas with steep relief and the current version of the L2 Operational Algorithm (V5.51) depicts few values in forested areas. ASCAT, in its turn, shows some limitations over agricultural and natural vegetation where it shows an increase of soil moisture from June to October probably due to increase of penetration depth in dry soil moisture conditions. AMSR-E LPRM shows a clear vegetation cycle over all the land cover classes. From all the remote sensing products, SMOS is the only one able to see irrigation and the only that does not show clear vegetation or roughness effects. In this study, we were able to assess the impact of higher resolution soil moisture products to map irrigated areas.", "keywords": ["2. Zero hunger", "0207 environmental engineering", "Soil Science", "Agriculture", "Geology", "AMSR-E", "02 engineering and technology", "15. Life on land", "16. Peace & justice", "01 natural sciences", "6. Clean water", "Water management", "ASCAT", "13. Climate action", "Regional scale", "LSM", "Soil moisture", "Computers in Earth Sciences", "Irrigation", "SMOS", "0105 earth and related environmental sciences"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.02.046"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Remote%20Sensing%20of%20Environment", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.1016/j.rse.2016.02.046", "name": "item", "description": "10.1016/j.rse.2016.02.046", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.1016/j.rse.2016.02.046"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2016-07-01T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.5281/zenodo.12546320", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-06-26T16:25:04Z", "type": "Report", "title": "Critical analysis of the experiences at member state level", "description": "The internal EJPSoil project SERENA contributed to the evaluation of soil multifunctionality aiming at providing assessment tools for land planning and soil policies at different scales. By co-working with relevant stakeholders, the project provided co-developed indicators and associated cookbooks to assess and map them, to report both on soil degradation, soil-based ecosystem services and their bundles, under actual conditions and for climate and land-use changes, at the regional, national, and European scales.\u00a0  In the current report (deliverable D3.2, version 1), the indicators, methods and data (including data availability) used by the countries participating in the SERENA project to assess specific soil threats and soil-based-ecosystem services were compared. Differences and similarities between the assessments of the different countries and the need for harmonisation were identified. The four soil threats considered are soil organic carbon loss, soil erosion, soil compaction, and soil sealing. The four soil-based ecosystem services included are greenhouse gas and climate regulation including carbon sequestration, hydrological control, primary/biomass production, and erosion control.", "keywords": ["Carbon sequestration", "Task 3.1", "Soil sealing", "Primary/biomass production", "Hydrological control", "15. Life on land", "SERENA", "6. Clean water", "Soil organic carbon loss", "D3.2v1", "13. Climate action", "EJPSoil", "WP3", "Erosion control", "11. Sustainability", "Soil erosion", "Regional scale", "National level", "Soil compaction"], "contacts": [{"organization": "Michel, Kerstin, Lemercier, Blandine, Lorenzetti, Romina,", "roles": ["creator"]}]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12546320"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.5281/zenodo.12546320", "name": "item", "description": "10.5281/zenodo.12546320", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.5281/zenodo.12546320"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2024-06-26T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "2288664970", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"license": "Open Access", "updated": "2026-06-26T16:29:35Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2016-03-05", "title": "Comparison of remote sensing and simulated soil moisture datasets in Mediterranean landscapes", "description": "AbstractThis paper presents the comparison of three global soil moisture products (ASCAT, AMSR and SMOS) versus a land surface model over a region representative of several Mediterranean landscapes located in the Northeast of the Iberian Peninsula. Our approach has been for agricultural and water management applications at the regional and local scale. Despite being a rather small area, we were able to observe different signal behaviours corresponding to major land cover classes in Mediterranean areas i.e.: dryland and irrigated crops, forests and natural vegetation (grass-shrubs). The area also allowed assessing the impact of topography. The first result of the study is that the results are very dependent on the normalizations used to make the data comparable, thus their impact must be carefully analysed. In this study, we applied two different normalisation methods (called ZV35 and ZV) and different moving average windows (1, 10 and 30days) in order to enhance seasonal effects. Using no smoothing window, ASCAT is the soil moisture product that correlates best with the LSM over all cover classes, whatever the method. Using smoothing window, AMSR-E tends to outperform other soil moisture products with the ZV method. The ZV35 method is not able to identify a small heavily irrigated area. The reason for these different results is that ZV35, tends to eliminate the monthly scale soil moisture memory and therefore becomes more sensitive to precipitation and less sensitive to the monthly evolution of superficial soil moisture. The comparison shows in general good agreement for all soil moisture products with the LSM on the temporal series simulated over flat, non irrigated areas which are not close to the sea. SMOS has difficulties in areas close to the sea and in areas with steep relief and the current version of the L2 Operational Algorithm (V5.51) depicts few values in forested areas. ASCAT, in its turn, shows some limitations over agricultural and natural vegetation where it shows an increase of soil moisture from June to October probably due to increase of penetration depth in dry soil moisture conditions. AMSR-E LPRM shows a clear vegetation cycle over all the land cover classes. From all the remote sensing products, SMOS is the only one able to see irrigation and the only that does not show clear vegetation or roughness effects. In this study, we were able to assess the impact of higher resolution soil moisture products to map irrigated areas.", "keywords": ["2. Zero hunger", "0207 environmental engineering", "Soil Science", "Agriculture", "Geology", "AMSR-E", "02 engineering and technology", "15. Life on land", "16. Peace & justice", "01 natural sciences", "6. Clean water", "Water management", "ASCAT", "13. Climate action", "Regional scale", "LSM", "Soil moisture", "Computers in Earth Sciences", "Irrigation", "SMOS", "0105 earth and related environmental sciences"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/2288664970"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Remote%20Sensing%20of%20Environment", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "2288664970", "name": "item", "description": "2288664970", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/2288664970"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2016-07-01T00:00:00Z"}}], "links": [{"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "This document as GeoJSON", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items?keywords=Regional+scale&f=json", "hreflang": "en-US"}, {"rel": "alternate", "type": "text/html", "title": "This document as HTML", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items?keywords=Regional+scale&f=html", "hreflang": "en-US"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection URL", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main", "hreflang": "en-US"}, {"type": "application/geo+json", "rel": "first", "title": "items (first)", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items?keywords=Regional+scale&", "hreflang": "en-US"}, {"rel": "last", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "items (last)", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items?keywords=Regional+scale&offset=3", "hreflang": "en-US"}], "numberMatched": 3, "numberReturned": 3, "distributedFeatures": [], "timeStamp": "2026-06-27T00:29:59.048250Z"}