{"type": "FeatureCollection", "features": [{"id": "10.1007/s10705-007-9091-9", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-07-27T16:15:05Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2007-02-23", "title": "Effects Of Fertiliser Type And The Presence Or Absence Of Plants On Nitrous Oxide Emissions From Irrigated Soils", "description": "Open AccessPeer reviewed", "keywords": ["2. Zero hunger", "N20 emission", "Municipal solid waste", "Composts", "04 agricultural and veterinary sciences", "15. Life on land", "01 natural sciences", "12. Responsible consumption", "Denitrification losses", "13. Climate action", "0401 agriculture", " forestry", " and fisheries", "Pig slurry", "0105 earth and related environmental sciences"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-007-9091-9"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Nutrient%20Cycling%20in%20Agroecosystems", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.1007/s10705-007-9091-9", "name": "item", "description": "10.1007/s10705-007-9091-9", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.1007/s10705-007-9091-9"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2007-02-24T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.1007/s00374-009-0370-2", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-07-27T16:14:44Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2009-03-25", "title": "Soil Biological Quality Of Grassland Fertilized With Adjusted Cattle Manure Slurries In Comparison With Organic And Inorganic Fertilizers", "description": "We studied the effect of five fertilizers (including two adjusted manure slurries) and an untreated control on soil biota and explored the effect on the ecosystem services they provided. Our results suggest that the available N (NO                   3                   \u2212                  and NH                   4                   +                 ) in the soil plays a central role in the effect of fertilizers on nematodes and microorganisms. Microorganisms are affected directly through nutrient availability and indirectly through grass root mass. Nematodes are affected indirectly through microbial biomass and grass root mass. A lower amount of available N in the treatment with inorganic fertilizer was linked to a higher root mass and a higher abundance and proportion of herbivorous nematodes. A higher amount of available N in the organic fertilizer treatments resulted in a twofold higher bacterial activity (measured as bacterial growth rate, viz. thymidine incorporation), a higher proportion of bacterivorous nematodes, a 30% higher potential N mineralization (aerobic incubation), and 25\u201350% more potentially mineralizable N (anaerobic incubation). Compared to inorganic fertilizer, organic fertilization increased the C total, the N total, the activity of decomposers, and the supply of nutrients via the soil food web. Within the group of organic fertilizers, there was no significant difference in C total, abundances of soil biota, and the potential N mineralization rate. There were no indications that farmyard manure or the adjusted manure slurries provided the ecosystem service \u201csupply of nutrients\u201d better than normal manure slurry. Normal manure slurry provided the highest bacterial activity and the highest amount of mineralizable N and it was the only fertilizer resulting in a positive trend in grass yield over the years\u00a02000\u20132005. The number of earthworm burrows was higher in the treatments with organic fertilizers compared to the one with the inorganic fertilizer, which suggests that organic fertilizers stimulate the ecosystem service of water regulation more than inorganic fertilizer. The trend towards higher epigeic earthworm numbers with application of farmyard manure and one of the adjusted manure slurries, combined with the negative relation between epigeic earthworms and bulk density and a significantly lower penetration resistance in the same fertilizer types, is preliminary evidence that these two organic fertilizer types contribute more to the service of soil structure maintenance than inorganic fertilizer.", "keywords": ["2. Zero hunger", "nitrogenous fertilizers", "dynamics", "04 agricultural and veterinary sciences", "15. Life on land", "pig slurry", "6. Clean water", "earthworms oligochaeta", "13. Climate action", "nematodes", "0401 agriculture", " forestry", " and fisheries", "mineralization", "microorganisms", "term", "management", "biodiversity"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-009-0370-2"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Biology%20and%20Fertility%20of%20Soils", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.1007/s00374-009-0370-2", "name": "item", "description": "10.1007/s00374-009-0370-2", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.1007/s00374-009-0370-2"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2009-03-26T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.1007/s00374-012-0752-8", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-07-27T16:14:45Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2012-11-22", "title": "Nitrogen Dynamics Of Anaerobically Digested Slurry Used To Fertilize Paddy Fields", "description": "To determine nitrogen (N) fate and environmental impact of applying anaerobic digestion slurry (ADS) to rice paddy (Oryza sativa L.), a field experiment was established using three treatments based on contrasting N application rate. The ADS (with ammonium-N accounting for >80 % of total N) treatment at a conventional application rate of 270 kg N ha\u22121 was compared to a negative control (no N fertilizer) and a positive control of urea applied at 270 kg N ha\u22121. The N budget showed the following distribution of applied N from ADS and urea: 41.3 \u00b1 5.1 % for ADS and 36.6 \u00b1 4.4 % for urea recovered by the rice plant (including straw, grain, and root), 16.4 \u00b1 3.7 % for ADS and 7.4 \u00b1 1.8 % for urea lost via ammonia volatilization, 0.26 \u00b1 0.15 % for ADS and 0.15 \u00b1 0.12 % for urea lost by direct N2O emission, 1.9 \u00b1 0.5 % for ADS and 2.3 \u00b1 0.8 % for urea leached downward, 0.70 \u00b1 0.15 % for ADS and 0.67 \u00b1 0.12 % for urea discharged with floodwater drainage, and 39.4 \u00b1 8.4 % for ADS and 53.0 \u00b1 9.1 % for urea retained by soil or lost by N2 emission. Compared to urea application, ADS application impacts the environment mainly through gaseous N losses rather than water N losses. ADS application had a positive impact on rice grain yield and reduced chemical fertilizer use. Considering the wide distribution of paddy fields and the ever-increasing quantities of ADS, ADS may serve as a valuable N source for rice cultivation, although mitigating ammonia and N2O losses should be further investigated.", "keywords": ["2. Zero hunger", "Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences", "Agronomy & Agriculture", "04 agricultural and veterinary sciences", "Ammonia volatilization", "Biological Sciences", "7. Clean energy", "Nitrogen-use efficiency", "6. Clean water", "Anaerobically digested slurry", "Denitrification", "Paddy field", "0401 agriculture", " forestry", " and fisheries", "Zero Hunger", "Environmental Sciences"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://escholarship.org/content/qt3d16p0gn/qt3d16p0gn.pdf"}, {"href": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-012-0752-8"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Biology%20and%20Fertility%20of%20Soils", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.1007/s00374-012-0752-8", "name": "item", "description": "10.1007/s00374-012-0752-8", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.1007/s00374-012-0752-8"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2012-11-22T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.1016/j.agee.2006.11.020", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-07-27T16:15:39Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2007-01-18", "title": "Nitrogen Oxide Emissions From An Irrigated Maize Crop Amended With Treated Pig Slurries And Composts In A Mediterranean Climate", "description": "Open AccessOrganic fertilizers may differ greatly in composition and as a result there may also be differences in nitrogen oxides emissions following their application to soils. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of mineral and organic N fertilizers on the nitrification and denitrification processes, and consequently on N2O and NO emissions. Therefore, a field experiment was carried out on an irrigated sandy loam soil under Mediterranean conditions during the maize (Zea mays L.) growing season. Untreated pig slurry (UPS) both with and without the nitrification inhibitor dicyandiamide (UPS + DCD), digested thin pig slurry fraction (DTP), composted solid fraction of slurry mixed with urea (CPS + U) and composted municipal solid waste mixed with urea (MSW + U) were applied at a rate of 175 kg available N ha 1. Their emissions were compared with those from urea (U) and a control treatment to which no nitrogen fertilization was administered (Control). Accumulated nitrous oxide losses during the crop season ranged from 6.0 to 9.3 kg N2O-N ha 1 for the Control and CPS + U, respectively, whereas nitric oxide losses ranged from 0.01 to 0.23 kg NO-N ha 1, for the Control and U, respectively. The use of digested slurries mitigated N2O emission by 25% in relation to untreated pig slurry, but NO emissions were similar for both treatments. Dicyandiamide reduced N2O and NO emissions by 64 and 78% with respect to slurry without the inhibitor. An indirect effect of DCD on denitrification was also observed, with a reduction of 32% in denitrification with respect to the slurry without the inhibitor. In this case, the greatest reduction in denitrification losses occurred during the irrigation period. Composts mixed with urea reduced NO emissions by 56% (CPS + U) and 85% (MSW + U) in relation to the urea treatment, but its effect on N2O depended on the type of compost involved: CPS + U increased N2O emission by 27%, whereas MSW + U reduced it by 55% in relation to urea. Denitrification was the most important process responsible for N2O emissions when organic fertilizers were applied to the soil, while nitrification was the most important for the inorganic fertilizer. The C:N ratio of fertilizers was a good predictor of their NO emissions, denitrification losses and N2O/N2 ratio. On the other hand, added soluble N was a good predictor for cumulative N2O emissions during the period before irrigation. This work shows that an appropriate selection of organic fertilizers based on their composition could be used to mitigate emissions of the atmospheric pollutants NO and N2O in comparison with urea.", "keywords": ["2. Zero hunger", "Nitrous oxide", "13. Climate action", "0401 agriculture", " forestry", " and fisheries", "Nitric oxide", "04 agricultural and veterinary sciences", "01 natural sciences", "6. Clean water", "Pig slurry", "Organic fertilizers", "0105 earth and related environmental sciences"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2006.11.020"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Agriculture%2C%20Ecosystems%20%26amp%3B%20Environment", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.1016/j.agee.2006.11.020", "name": "item", "description": "10.1016/j.agee.2006.11.020", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.1016/j.agee.2006.11.020"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2007-08-01T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.1007/s12649-017-9910-4", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-07-27T16:15:32Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2017-03-25", "title": "Possibilities of Using Liquids from Slow Pyrolysis and Hydrothermal Carbonization in Acidification of Animal Slurry", "description": "Pyrolysis and hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) are gaining increasing interest in the context of biomass valorization. However, these processes yield a liquid fraction with an acidic pH value challenging to productize. In this paper, the possibility of replacing concentrated acids in acidification of animal slurry with organic acids derived from thermochemical conversion of various biomasses was investigated. The acid composition of four pyrolysis and one HTC liquid fraction were characterized using capillary electrophoresis and their total acidity determined titrimetrically. The amount of each liquid needed to reduce the pH of pig and cattle slurries to 6.0 and 5.5 were recorded. The total acidity of pyrolysis liquids varied highly (850-2560 meq l<sup>-1</sup>) depending on the biomass. For HTC liquid the total acidity was low (220 meq l<sup>-1</sup>). The most concentrated liquid, which showed greatest potential for practical use, was derived from pyrolysis of willow wood. Its required application rate for decreasing the pH of the slurries from &gt;7.5 to 6.0 was 20-50 l t<sup>-1</sup>. This study suggests that there is a possibility of using liquids from pyrolysis process for acidification of animal slurries. Producing more concentrated liquids, further concentration of these acidiferous streams and the effects of the liquid addition on the properties of slurry are worth further studying.", "keywords": ["ta412", "600", "02 engineering and technology", "kuivatislaus", "pyrolysis", "01 natural sciences", "hydrothermal carbonization", "acidification", "13. Climate action", "happamoituminen", "0202 electrical engineering", " electronic engineering", " information engineering", "SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy", "ta116", "animal slurry", "0105 earth and related environmental sciences"]}, "links": [{"href": "http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12649-017-9910-4.pdf"}, {"href": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-017-9910-4"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Waste%20and%20Biomass%20Valorization", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.1007/s12649-017-9910-4", "name": "item", "description": "10.1007/s12649-017-9910-4", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.1007/s12649-017-9910-4"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2017-03-25T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.1016/j.biortech.2012.08.124", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-07-27T16:16:04Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2012-09-03", "title": "Comparing Environmental Consequences Of Anaerobic Mono- And Co-Digestion Of Pig Manure To Produce Bio-Energy - A Life Cycle Perspective", "description": "The aim of this work was to assess the environmental consequences of anaerobic mono- and co-digestion of pig manure to produce bio-energy, from a life cycle perspective. This included assessing environmental impacts and land use change emissions (LUC) required to replace used co-substrates for anaerobic digestion. Environmental impact categories considered were climate change, terrestrial acidification, marine and freshwater eutrophication, particulate matter formation, land use, and fossil fuel depletion. Six scenarios were evaluated: mono-digestion of manure, co-digestion with: maize silage, maize silage and glycerin, beet tails, wheat yeast concentrate (WYC), and roadside grass. Mono-digestion reduced most impacts, but represented a limited source for bio-energy. Co-digestion with maize silage, beet tails, and WYC (competing with animal feed), and glycerin increased bio-energy production (up to 568%), but at expense of increasing climate change (through LUC), marine eutrophication, and land use. Co-digestion with wastes or residues like roadside grass gave the best environmental performance.", "keywords": ["2. Zero hunger", "Swine", "emissions", "indirect land use change", "02 engineering and technology", "bioenergy", "Environment", "15. Life on land", "pig slurry", "renewable energy", "7. Clean energy", "6. Clean water", "Consequential LCA", "Refuse Disposal", "12. Responsible consumption", "Manure", "Bacteria", " Anaerobic", "13. Climate action", "Biofuels", "greenhouse gases", "11. Sustainability", "0202 electrical engineering", " electronic engineering", " information engineering", "systems", "Animals", "Methane"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.08.124"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Bioresource%20Technology", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.1016/j.biortech.2012.08.124", "name": "item", "description": "10.1016/j.biortech.2012.08.124", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.08.124"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2012-12-01T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.08.026", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-07-27T16:16:09Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2010-09-13", "title": "Optimization Of Pig Slurry Application To Heavy Metal Polluted Soils Monitoring Nitrification Processes", "description": "Nitrification is often negatively affected by heavy metal pollution in soils, this limiting land revegetation. Thus, the potential use of pig slurry as a nitrogen-rich organic amendment in different heavy metal contaminated soils has been evaluated; this also being a way of recycling this waste. In order to identify the factors affecting nitrification processes in heavy metal polluted soils (soil pH, heavy metal solubility and the N source), incubation experiments were run using two polluted soils with different pH values (5.0 and 7.1) and a non-contaminated soil (pH 8.2). Ammonium was added as pig slurry or as ammonium sulphate for comparison (both added at 150 mg NH(4)(+)-N kg(-1) of soil). Pig slurry provoked higher nitrification rates and N-immobilisation than ammonium sulphate, especially in the neutral-polluted soil, reflecting an improvement of the microbial activity in the soil. The microbial immobilisation of N led to an inverse relationship between the amount of N added and nitrate conversion in the neutral-polluted soil and in the non-contaminated soil amended with different pig slurry dosages (75, 150 and 225mg NH(4)(+)-N kg(-1) of soil). Low rates of nitrification and N-immobilisation were found in the acidic soil. Pig slurry addition to metal polluted soils enhanced soil nitrification, especially when metals were in low-solubility forms.", "keywords": ["[SDE] Environmental Sciences", "2. Zero hunger", "PIG SLURRY RECYCLING", "SOIL RECLAMATION", "Nitrogen", "Swine", "METAL SOLUBILITY", "04 agricultural and veterinary sciences", "Hydrogen-Ion Concentration", "15. Life on land", "NITRIFICATION", "6. Clean water", "12. Responsible consumption", "Manure", "Quaternary Ammonium Compounds", "MICROBIAL IMMOBILISATION", "Biodegradation", " Environmental", "13. Climate action", "METAL", "Metals", " Heavy", "Animals", "Soil Pollutants", "0401 agriculture", " forestry", " and fisheries", "Soil Microbiology"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.08.026"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Chemosphere", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.08.026", "name": "item", "description": "10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.08.026", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.08.026"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2010-10-01T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121443", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-07-27T16:16:55Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2020-04-09", "title": "Bio-acidification and enhanced crusting as an alternative to sulphuric acid addition to slurry to mitigate ammonia and greenhouse gases emissions during short term storage", "description": "Abstract   Several solutions are today proposed to farmers to minimize ammonia (NH3) emissions during storage. In the present study, special attention was given to slurry acidification and slurry crust enhancement and our objective was to assess the effect of slurry bio-acidification using sugar and cheese whey as an alternative to sulphuric acid, and the potential of rice bran as crust enhancer on NH3 and greenhouse gases emissions during storage. Both the cheese whey and the rice bran are materials, available in large amounts, with low commercial value in some EU regions as Portugal and its use, at farm scale, will be a win-win situation. Sugar is also a good alternative to acid attending its relatively low value. A laboratory experiment was performed for 2 months with five treatments: non-treated cattle slurry (CTRL), slurry treated with sulphuric acid (ACID), slurry treated with sugar (SUGAR), slurry treated with cheese whey (WHEY) and rice bran applied on the slurry surface (RICE). The SUGAR treatment led to a reduction of NH3 emissions by 45% relative to CTRL while WHEY and RICE resulted in a reduction of 68% and 25%, respectively. Nevertheless, this effect of SUGAR and WHEY was shorter than in ACID, since NH3 emissions started to be observed in those 2 treatments after 31 and 35 days of storage, respectively. Nitrous oxide emissions remained close to zero in ACID and SUGAR. RICE led to the highest emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) releasing almost 5% of carbon present in the initial mixture (slurry\u00a0+\u00a0rice bran) and presented the highest methane emissions. The ACID and SUGAR led to a significant decrease of the total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Our results indicate that bio-acidification using a source of sugar could be a good alternative to H2SO4 to reduce simultaneously NH3 and GHG emissions during storage.", "keywords": ["rice bran", "2. Zero hunger", "cheese whey", "sugar", "13. Climate action", "bio-acidification", "crust formation", "slurry", "01 natural sciences", "7. Clean energy", "6. Clean water", "0105 earth and related environmental sciences", "12. Responsible consumption"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121443"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Journal%20of%20Cleaner%20Production", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121443", "name": "item", "description": "10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121443", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121443"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2020-08-01T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130369", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-07-27T16:16:55Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2022-01-07", "title": "A step towards the production of manure-based fertilizers: Disclosing the effects of animal species and slurry treatment on their nutrients content and availability", "description": "Open Accessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion", "keywords": ["nutrient recycling", "2. Zero hunger", "13. Climate action", "animal manures", "slurry acidification", "0401 agriculture", " forestry", " and fisheries", "slurry solid-liquid separation", "04 agricultural and veterinary sciences", "15. Life on land", "nutrients ratio", "animal manures blending", "12. Responsible consumption"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130369"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Journal%20of%20Cleaner%20Production", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130369", "name": "item", "description": "10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130369", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130369"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2022-02-01T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.3389/fenvs.2020.575466", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-07-27T16:21:34Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2020-09-18", "title": "Multi-Functional Land Use Is Not Self-Evident for European Farmers: A Critical Review", "description": "Soils perform more functions than primary productivity. Examples of these functions are the recycling of nutrients, the regulation and purification of water, the regulation of the climate, and supporting biodiversity. These abilities are generally referred to as the soil quality. Soil management that favors primary productivity may have positive and negative impacts on the other functions, and vice versa, depending on soil and climatic conditions. All these functions are under pressure, particularly in intensive agriculture. In the absence of mandatory regulations, most European farmers give limited attention to other functions than primary productivity in spite of recommendations by scientists, society and policy makers to acknowledge the ecosystem services provided by soils. The present paper analyses the underlying causes of this limited attention for the multi-functionality of soils by farmers. It is concluded that their focus on primary productivity may stem from (1) insufficient visible proof for soil degradation and benefits of preventive measures over curative measures, (2) limited awareness or conviction of long-term synergies, (3) insufficient remuneration of ecosystem services by society or compensation of yield penalties in favor of these services, (4) lacking trustworthy knowledge about and support for multi-functional soil management, and (5) absence of incentives and regulations on soil management and their enforcement. All these shortcomings need to be addressed by advisors, scientists, and policy makers, whilst acknowledging the need for underpinning and differentiation of incentives and regulations.", "keywords": ["GLOBAL DILEMMA", "DEPLETE SOIL-NITROGEN", "ECOSYSTEM SERVICES", "COVER CROPS", "CONSERVATION AGRICULTURE", "01 natural sciences", "primary productivity", "soil degradation", "MANAGEMENT", "QUALITY", "GE1-350", "soil quality", "0105 earth and related environmental sciences", "2. Zero hunger", "CLIMATE-CHANGE", "soil health", "land management", "04 agricultural and veterinary sciences", "15. Life on land", "Environmental sciences", "ORGANIC-MATTER", "13. Climate action", "CATTLE SLURRY", "soil function", "0401 agriculture", " forestry", " and fisheries", "ecosystem services"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2020.575466"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Frontiers%20in%20Environmental%20Science", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.3389/fenvs.2020.575466", "name": "item", "description": "10.3389/fenvs.2020.575466", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.3389/fenvs.2020.575466"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2020-09-18T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.1371/journal.pone.0111965", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-07-27T16:20:14Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2015-06-08", "title": "The Effect Of Chemical Amendments Used For Phosphorus Abatement On Greenhouse Gas And Ammonia Emissions From Dairy Cattle Slurry: Synergies And Pollution", "description": "Land application of cattle slurry can result in incidental and chronic phosphorus (P) loss to waterbodies, leading to eutrophication. Chemical amendment of slurry has been proposed as a management practice, allowing slurry nutrients to remain available to plants whilst mitigating P losses in runoff. The effectiveness of amendments is well understood but their impacts on other loss pathways (so-called 'pollution swapping' potential) and therefore the feasibility of using such amendments has not been examined to date. The aim of this laboratory scale study was to determine how the chemical amendment of slurry affects losses of NH3, CH4, N2O, and CO2. Alum, FeCl2, Polyaluminium chloride (PAC)-and biochar reduced NH3 emissions by 92, 54, 65 and 77% compared to the slurry control, while lime increased emissions by 114%. Cumulative N2O emissions of cattle slurry increased when amended with alum and FeCl2 by 202% and 154% compared to the slurry only treatment. Lime, PAC and biochar resulted in a reduction of 44, 29 and 63% in cumulative N2O loss compared to the slurry only treatment. Addition of amendments to slurry did not significantly affect soil CO2 release during the study while CH4 emissions followed a similar trend for all of the amended slurries applied, with an initial increase in losses followed by a rapid decrease for the duration of the study. All of the amendments examined reduced the initial peak in CH4 emissions compared to the slurry only treatment. There was no significant effect of slurry amendments on global warming potential (GWP) caused by slurry land application, with the exception of biochar. After considering pollution swapping in conjunction with amendment effectiveness, the amendments recommended for further field study are PAC, alum and lime. This study has also shown that biochar has potential to reduce GHG losses arising from slurry application.", "keywords": ["Greenhouse Effect", "Time Factors", "Science", "methane emissions", "Nitrous Oxide", "n2o emissions", "Environment", "Global Warming", "soil", "12. Responsible consumption", "Ammonia", "Air Pollution", "Animals", "volatilization", "2. Zero hunger", "Air Pollutants", "Sewage", "Q", "Pollution swapping", "R", "Phosphorus", "04 agricultural and veterinary sciences", "Carbon Dioxide", "15. Life on land", "Greenhouse Gas", "field", "6. Clean water", "livestock slurry", "Dairying", "Slurries", "13. Climate action", "manure", "nitrous-oxide emission", "Medicine", "Feasibility Studies", "0401 agriculture", " forestry", " and fisheries", "Cattle", "grassland", "Methane", "charcoal", "Research Article"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111965"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/PLOS%20ONE", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.1371/journal.pone.0111965", "name": "item", "description": "10.1371/journal.pone.0111965", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.1371/journal.pone.0111965"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2015-06-08T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.1111/j.1475-2743.2004.tb00395.x", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"license": "Open Access", "updated": "2026-07-27T16:19:42Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2010-08-06", "title": "Impact Of Pig Slurry On Soil Properties, Water Salinization, Nitrate Leaching And Crop Yield In A Four-Year Experiment In Central Spain", "description": "<p>Abstract.  The repeated application of pig slurry to agricultural soils may result in an accumulation of salts and a risk of aquifer pollution due to nitrate leaching and salinization. Under Mediterranean conditions, a field experiment on a sandy loam soil (Typic Xerofluvent) was performed with maize (Zea mays) in 1998, 1999 and 2001 to study the effects of applying optimal (P1) and excessive rates (P3) of pig slurry on soil salinization, nitrate leaching and groundwater pollution. The rate of pig slurry was established considering the optimal N rate for maize in this soil (170, 162 and 176 kg N ha\uffe2\uff88\uff921 for 1998, 1999 and 2001, respectively). Pig slurry treatments were compared to an optimal N rate supplied as urea (U) and a control treatment without N fertilizer (P0). The composition of the slurries showed great variability between years. Mean NO3\uffe2\uff88\uff92 leaching losses from 1998 to 2001 were 329, 215, 173 and 78 kg N ha\uffe2\uff88\uff921 for P3, P1, U and P0 treatments, respectively. The amount of total dissolved salts (TDS) added to the soil in slurry application between 1998 and 2001 was 2019 kg TDS ha\uffe2\uff88\uff921 for the P1 treatment and 6058 kg TDS ha\uffe2\uff88\uff921 for the P3 treatment. As a consequence, the electrical conductivity (EC) of the slurry\uffe2\uff80\uff90treated soils was greater than that of the control soil. The EC correlated significantly with the sodium concentration of the soil solution. Over the entire experimental period, 2653, 2202 and 2110 kg Na ha\uffe2\uff88\uff921 entered the aquifer from the P3, P1 and P0 treatments, respectively. The P3 treatment did not significantly increase grain production in 1999 and 2001 compared with that achieved with the optimal N rate treatment (P1). This behaviour shows the importance of establishing application guidelines for pig slurry that will reduce the risk of soil and groundwater pollution.</p>", "keywords": ["2. Zero hunger", "Soil salinity", "04 agricultural and veterinary sciences", "15. Life on land", "Nitrate", "01 natural sciences", "6. Clean water", "Maize", "13. Climate action", "Leaching", "0401 agriculture", " forestry", " and fisheries", "Aquifer pollution", "Irrigation", "Pig slurry", "0105 earth and related environmental sciences"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2004.tb00395.x"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Soil%20Use%20and%20Management", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.1111/j.1475-2743.2004.tb00395.x", "name": "item", "description": "10.1111/j.1475-2743.2004.tb00395.x", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2004.tb00395.x"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2004-12-01T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.1111/sum.12027", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-07-27T16:19:50Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2013-01-14", "title": "Effects Of Short-Term Nitrogen Supply From Livestock Manures And Cover Crops On Silage Maize Production And Nitrate Leaching", "description": "Abstract<p>Resource use efficiency requires a correct appreciation of the nitrogen (N) fertilizer replacement value (NFRV, percentage of total N applied) of manures. We assessed the NFRVs of the liquid fraction originating from separated pig slurry (MC), untreated pig slurry (PS), untreated cattle slurry (CS), the solid fraction from separated pig slurry (SF) and solid farmyard manure from cattle (FYM) in two consecutive years in silage maize grown on a sandy soil. Maize yields responded positively to each of these N sources applied at rates up to 150\uffc2\uffa0kg of mineral fertilizer equivalents per ha per year (i.e. NFRV\uffc2\uffa0\uffc3\uff97\uffc2\uffa0total N rate). The observed NFRVs, relative to calcium ammonium nitrate fertilizer, amounted to 78% for MC, 82% for PS, 79% for CS, 56% for SF and 34% for FYM when averaged over both years. NFRVs were positively related to the ammonium\uffe2\uff80\uff90N share in the total N content. Rye cover crop establishment after the harvest of maize reduced nitrate concentrations of the upper groundwater by, on average, 7.5\uffc2\uffa0mg\uffc2\uffa0nitrate\uffe2\uff80\uff90N/L in the first year and 10.9\uffc2\uffa0mg/L in the second year, relative to a bare soil. Regardless of the presence of a cover crop, nitrate concentrations responded positively to the applied rate of effective N (total N\uffc2\uffa0\uffc3\uff97\uffc2\uffa0NFRV) but less to postharvest residual soil mineral N.</p>", "keywords": ["2. Zero hunger", "cut grassland", "0401 agriculture", " forestry", " and fisheries", "netherlands", "04 agricultural and veterinary sciences", "slurry", "15. Life on land", "fertilizer value", "6. Clean water", "soil"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12027"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Soil%20Use%20and%20Management", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.1111/sum.12027", "name": "item", "description": "10.1111/sum.12027", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.1111/sum.12027"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2013-01-14T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.3390/agriculture11090870", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-07-27T16:21:41Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2021-09-10", "title": "Assessing Nitrogen Availability in Biobased Fertilizers: Effect of Vegetation on Mineralization Patterns", "description": "<p>Biobased nitrogen (N) fertilizers derived from animal manure can substitute synthetic mineral N fertilizer and contribute to more sustainable agriculture. Practitioners need to obtain a reliable estimation of the biobased fertilizers\uffe2\uff80\uff99 N value. This study compared the estimates for pig slurry (PS) and liquid fraction of digestate (LFD) using laboratory incubation and plant-growing experiments. A no-N treatment was used as control and calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) as synthetic mineral fertilizer. After 100 days of incubation, the addition of PS and LFD resulted in a net N mineralization rate of 10.6 \uffc2\uffb1 0.3% and 20.6 \uffc2\uffb1 0.4% of the total applied N, respectively. The addition of CAN showed no significant net mineralization or immobilization (net N release 96 \uffc2\uffb1 6%). In the pot experiment under vegetation, all fertilized treatments caused N immobilization with a negative net N mineralization rate of \uffe2\uff88\uff9251 \uffc2\uffb1 11%, \uffe2\uff88\uff929 \uffc2\uffb1 4%, and \uffe2\uff88\uff9227 \uffc2\uffb1 10% of the total applied N in CAN, PS, and LFD treatments, respectively. Compared to the pot experiment, the laboratory incubation without vegetation may have overestimated the N value of biobased fertilizers. Vegetation resulted in a lower estimation of available N from fertilizers, probably due to intensified competition with soil microbes or increased N loss via denitrification.</p>", "keywords": ["Agriculture and Food Sciences", "2. Zero hunger", "MICROBIAL TURNOVER", "REPLACEMENT VALUE", "Agriculture (General)", "ORGANIC-NITROGEN", "SOIL PROPERTIES", "04 agricultural and veterinary sciences", "incubation", "maize", "6. Clean water", "S1-972", "ROOT", "CROP YIELD", "digestate", "immobilization", "N MINERALIZATION", "0401 agriculture", " forestry", " and fisheries", "NUTRIENT AVAILABILITY", "PIG SLURRY", "MAIZE", "N dynamics"]}, "links": [{"href": "http://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/9/870/pdf"}, {"href": "https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/9/870/pdf"}, {"href": "https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11090870"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Agriculture", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.3390/agriculture11090870", "name": "item", "description": "10.3390/agriculture11090870", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.3390/agriculture11090870"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2021-09-10T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.3390/agronomy11071374", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-07-27T16:21:43Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2021-07-07", "title": "The Potential of Digestate and the Liquid Fraction of Digestate as Chemical Fertiliser Substitutes under the RENURE Criteria", "description": "<p>This study assessed how digestate and the liquid fraction (LF) of digestate would perform as candidate RENURE fertilisers (recovered nitrogen from manure) in nitrate vulnerable zones under the proposed criteria of the Joint Research Centre, namely, (i) a mineral nitrogen to total nitrogen ratio \uffe2\uff89\uffa5 90% (Nmin:TN \uffe2\uff89\uffa5 90%) or a total organic carbon to TN ratio \uffe2\uff89\uffa4 3 (TOC:TN \uffe2\uff89\uffa4 3); (ii) limits of \uffe2\uff89\uffa4300 copper (Cu) mg kg\uffe2\uff88\uff921 and \uffe2\uff89\uffa4800 Zinc (Zn) mg kg\uffe2\uff88\uff921. These criteria were applied to unpublished data (n = 2622) on digestate compositional properties, further amended with data from the literature (n = 180); digestate analysis from seven full-scale biogas facilities (n = 14); and biogas industry stakeholders (n = 23). The results showed that Cu and Zn mostly met the criteria, with compliance rates of 94.7% (of 1035 entries) and 95.0% (of 1038 entries), respectively. Just above 5% (of 1856 entries) met the Nmin/TN \uffe2\uff89\uffa5 90% criterion, while 36% (of 1583 entries) met the TOC/TN \uffe2\uff89\uffa4 3 criterion, while total compliance was 32% (of 1893 entries). When targeting the LF, total compliance increased noticeably, between 43 and 58% depending on DM range, indicating that LFs are better suited RENURE candidate fertilisers than unseparated digestate.</p>", "keywords": ["Agriculture and Food Sciences", "AMENDMENT PROPERTIES", "RENURE", "liquid fraction", "SEWAGE-SLUDGE", "NITROUS-OXIDE EMISSIONS", "ANAEROBIC CO-DIGESTION", "SAFEMANURE", "7. Clean energy", "NUTRIENT RECOVERY PROCESSES", "NUE", "USE EFFICIENCY", "BIOGAS PRODUCTION", "ORGANIC FRACTION", "S", "circular economy", "Agriculture", "04 agricultural and veterinary sciences", "6. Clean water", "Nitrates Directive", "NFRV", "MINERAL FERTILIZERS", "Earth and Environmental Sciences", "digestate", "manure", "CATTLE SLURRY", "0401 agriculture", " forestry", " and fisheries"]}, "links": [{"href": "http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/11/7/1374/pdf"}, {"href": "https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11071374"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Agronomy", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.3390/agronomy11071374", "name": "item", "description": "10.3390/agronomy11071374", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.3390/agronomy11071374"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2021-07-07T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.3390/agronomy12020265", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-07-27T16:21:44Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2022-01-21", "title": "Slurry Acidification as a Solution to Minimize Ammonia Emissions from the Combined Application of Animal Manure and Synthetic Fertilizer in No-Tillage", "description": "<p>The combined application of manure/slurry and synthetic fertilizer (SF) might be a solution to decrease transport and application costs involving those by-products as well as enable access to them in regions where availability is low. Moreover, their joint application can potentially reduce environmental pollution, enlarge the manure benefits to more areas, and enhance the SF efficiency. However, such a strategy might result in increased ammonia emissions when applied to crop residues. Two experiments were implemented to assess ammonia emissions from stubble-covered soil fertilized with manure amended with SF. In Experiment 1 (E1), urea (U) and calcium ammonium nitrate (AN) were applied combined with dairy manure (MAN). In Experiment 2 (E2), urea was combined with acidified pig slurry (APS) and applied just after sowing (T0) or eight days later (T8). The combinations U + MAN and AN + MAN increased the ammonia emissions, while APS decreased the emissions from U, in APS + U combination, by more than 75%. Therefore, manure combined with SF applied on stubble-covered soil should not be recommended. T8 reduced ammonia emissions from U. APS enhanced the efficiency of U, being then an interesting strategy to mitigate ammonia emissions when applied on stubble-covered soil, as in no-tillage.</p>", "keywords": ["2. Zero hunger", "acidified slurry", "crop residues", "stubble-covered soil", "S", "acidified slurry; organic-mineral fertilizer; manure; conservation agriculture; crop residues; stubble-covered soil; urea; in-season fertilization; slurry sidedressing", "Agriculture", "urea", "04 agricultural and veterinary sciences", "15. Life on land", "7. Clean energy", "6. Clean water", "organic-mineral fertilizer", "12. Responsible consumption", "conservation agriculture", "13. Climate action", "manure", "0401 agriculture", " forestry", " and fisheries", "slurry sidedressing", "in-season fertilization"]}, "links": [{"href": "http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/2/265/pdf"}, {"href": "https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/2/265/pdf"}, {"href": "https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12020265"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Agronomy", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.3390/agronomy12020265", "name": "item", "description": "10.3390/agronomy12020265", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.3390/agronomy12020265"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2022-01-20T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "3087611538", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-07-27T16:27:33Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2020-09-18", "title": "Multi-Functional Land Use Is Not Self-Evident for European Farmers: A Critical Review", "description": "Soils perform more functions than primary productivity. Examples of these functions are the recycling of nutrients, the regulation and purification of water, the regulation of the climate, and supporting biodiversity. These abilities are generally referred to as the soil quality. Soil management that favors primary productivity may have positive and negative impacts on the other functions, and vice versa, depending on soil and climatic conditions. All these functions are under pressure, particularly in intensive agriculture. In the absence of mandatory regulations, most European farmers give limited attention to other functions than primary productivity in spite of recommendations by scientists, society and policy makers to acknowledge the ecosystem services provided by soils. The present paper analyses the underlying causes of this limited attention for the multi-functionality of soils by farmers. It is concluded that their focus on primary productivity may stem from (1) insufficient visible proof for soil degradation and benefits of preventive measures over curative measures, (2) limited awareness or conviction of long-term synergies, (3) insufficient remuneration of ecosystem services by society or compensation of yield penalties in favor of these services, (4) lacking trustworthy knowledge about and support for multi-functional soil management, and (5) absence of incentives and regulations on soil management and their enforcement. All these shortcomings need to be addressed by advisors, scientists, and policy makers, whilst acknowledging the need for underpinning and differentiation of incentives and regulations.", "keywords": ["GLOBAL DILEMMA", "DEPLETE SOIL-NITROGEN", "ECOSYSTEM SERVICES", "COVER CROPS", "CONSERVATION AGRICULTURE", "01 natural sciences", "primary productivity", "soil degradation", "MANAGEMENT", "QUALITY", "GE1-350", "soil quality", "0105 earth and related environmental sciences", "2. Zero hunger", "CLIMATE-CHANGE", "soil health", "land management", "04 agricultural and veterinary sciences", "15. Life on land", "Environmental sciences", "ORGANIC-MATTER", "13. Climate action", "CATTLE SLURRY", "soil function", "0401 agriculture", " forestry", " and fisheries", "ecosystem services"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/3087611538"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Frontiers%20in%20Environmental%20Science", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "3087611538", "name": "item", "description": "3087611538", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/3087611538"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2020-09-18T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "a2fbdaab-010f-4778-840b-27e9f1b002dd", "type": "Feature", "geometry": {"type": "Polygon", "coordinates": [[[13.32, 52.35], [13.32, 52.35], [13.32, 52.35], [13.32, 52.35], [13.32, 52.35]]]}, "properties": {"themes": [{"concepts": [{"id": "farming"}], "scheme": "https://standards.iso.org/iso/19139/resources/gmxCodelists.xml#MD_TopicCategoryCode"}, {"concepts": [{"id": "horticulture"}, {"id": "long-term experiments"}, {"id": "vegetable crops"}, {"id": "fertilization"}, {"id": "fertilizers"}, {"id": "soil types"}, {"id": "soil fertility"}, {"id": "soil organic carbon"}, {"id": "soil organic matter"}, {"id": "field crops"}, {"id": "crop management"}, {"id": "crop production"}, {"id": "crop rotation"}, {"id": "crop residues"}, {"id": "crop residue management"}, {"id": "crop yield"}, {"id": "nutrient balance"}, {"id": "nutrient management"}, {"id": "nutrient uptake"}, {"id": "nutrient use efficiency"}, {"id": "nutrient utilization"}, {"id": "nitrogen"}, {"id": "nitrogen balance"}, {"id": "nitrogen content"}, {"id": "nitrogen fertilizers"}, {"id": "nitrogen-use efficiency"}, {"id": "potassium"}, {"id": "phosphorus"}, {"id": "magnesium"}, {"id": "cucumbers"}, {"id": "Cucumis"}, {"id": "Cucumis sativus"}, {"id": "carrots"}, {"id": "Daucus carota"}, {"id": "cabbages"}, {"id": "Brassica oleracea var. capitata"}, {"id": "leeks"}, {"id": "Allium ampeloprasum"}, {"id": "celery"}, {"id": "Apium graveolens"}, {"id": "Apium graveolens var. rapaceum"}, {"id": "farmyard manure"}, {"id": "organic amendments"}, {"id": "organic fertilizers"}, {"id": "slurry"}, {"id": "bark mulches"}, {"id": "resource management"}, {"id": "Luvisols"}, {"id": "Fluvisols"}, {"id": "Phaeozems"}], "scheme": "AGROVOC Multilingual agricultural thesaurus"}, {"concepts": [{"id": "opendata"}], "scheme": "Individual"}, {"concepts": [{"id": "Boden"}, {"id": "agricultural management"}, {"id": "horticulture"}, {"id": "crop production"}, {"id": "crop rotation"}, {"id": "crop waste"}, {"id": "cultivation"}, {"id": "cultivation system"}, {"id": "cultivation method"}, {"id": "food production (agriculture)"}, {"id": "irrigation farming"}, {"id": "manure"}, {"id": "mineral fertiliser"}, {"id": "nitrogenous fertiliser"}, {"id": "organic fertiliser"}, {"id": "soil fertilisation"}, {"id": "soil fertility"}, {"id": "vegetable"}, {"id": "vegetable cultivation"}, {"id": "vegetable waste"}, {"id": "yield (agricultural)"}, {"id": "resource utilisation"}, {"id": "organic matter"}, {"id": "phosphate"}], "scheme": "GEMET - Concepts, version 2.4"}], "rights": "Restrictions applied to assure the protection of privacy or intellectual property, and any special restrictions or limitations or warnings on using the resource or metadata. Reports, articles, papers, scientific and non - scientific works of any form, including tables, maps, or any other kind of output, in printed or electronic form, based in whole or in part on the data supplied, must contain an acknowledgement of the form: \"Data reused from the BonaRes Data Centre www.bonares.de. This data were created as part of the Other's research activities.\" Although every care has been taken in preparing and testing the data, the Other and the BonaRes Data Centre cannot guarantee that the data are correct; neither does the Other and the BonaRes Data Centre accept any liability whatsoever for any error, missing data or omission in the data, or for any loss or damage arising from its use. The Other and BonaRes Data Centre will not be responsible for any direct or indirect use which might be made of the data.", "updated": "2024-08-27", "type": "Dataset", "created": "2022-07-19", "language": "eng", "title": "50 years box plot experiment in Grossbeeren (1972 - 2022) - Experiment Setting", "description": "Description of Table 25\n\nGeneral description see mother table: (https://doi.org/10.20387/bonares-fd75-nca9); Related datasets are listed in the metadata element 'Related Identifier'.\nDataset version 1.0", "formats": [{"name": "CSV"}], "keywords": ["horticulture", "long-term experiments", "vegetable crops", "fertilization", "fertilizers", "soil types", "soil fertility", "soil organic carbon", "soil organic matter", "field crops", "crop management", "crop production", "crop rotation", "crop residues", "crop residue management", "crop yield", "nutrient balance", "nutrient management", "nutrient uptake", "nutrient use efficiency", "nutrient utilization", "nitrogen", "nitrogen balance", "nitrogen content", "nitrogen fertilizers", "nitrogen-use efficiency", "potassium", "phosphorus", "magnesium", "cucumbers", "Cucumis", "Cucumis sativus", "carrots", "Daucus carota", "cabbages", "Brassica oleracea var. capitata", "leeks", "Allium ampeloprasum", "celery", "Apium graveolens", "Apium graveolens var. rapaceum", "farmyard manure", "organic amendments", "organic fertilizers", "slurry", "bark mulches", "resource management", "Luvisols", "Fluvisols", "Phaeozems", "opendata", "Boden", "agricultural management", "horticulture", "crop production", "crop rotation", "crop waste", "cultivation", "cultivation system", "cultivation method", "food production (agriculture)", "irrigation farming", "manure", "mineral fertiliser", "nitrogenous fertiliser", "organic fertiliser", "soil fertilisation", "soil fertility", "vegetable", "vegetable cultivation", "vegetable waste", "yield (agricultural)", "resource utilisation", "organic matter", "phosphate"], "contacts": [{"name": "Eric B\u00f6necke", "organization": "Leibniz-Institut f\u00fcr Gem\u00fcse- und Zierpflanzenbau - IGZ", "position": null, "roles": ["author"], "phones": [{"value": null}], "emails": [{"value": "boenecke@igzev.de"}], "addresses": [{"deliveryPoint": [null], "city": null, "administrativeArea": null, "postalCode": null, "country": null}], "links": [{"href": null}]}, {"name": "Dominik M\u00fcller", "organization": "Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg", "position": null, "roles": ["projectLeader"], "phones": [{"value": null}], "emails": [{"value": "dominik.mueller2@student.uni-halle.de"}], "addresses": [{"deliveryPoint": [null], "city": null, "administrativeArea": null, "postalCode": null, "country": null}], "links": [{"href": null}]}, {"name": "ZALF", "organization": "Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF)", "position": "Research Platform 'Data Analysis & Simulation' - Workgroup Research Data Management", "roles": ["publisher"], "phones": [{"value": "+49 33432 82 300"}], "emails": [{"value": "dataservice@zalf.de"}], "addresses": [{"deliveryPoint": ["Eberswalder Strasse 84"], "city": "M\u00fcncheberg", "administrativeArea": "Brandenburg", "postalCode": "15374", "country": "Germany"}], "links": [{"href": null}]}, {"name": "J\u00f6rg R\u00fchlmann", "organization": "Leibniz-Institut f\u00fcr Gem\u00fcse- und Zierpflanzenbau - IGZ", "position": null, "roles": ["author"], "phones": [{"value": null}], "emails": [{"value": "ruehlmann@igzev.de"}], "addresses": [{"deliveryPoint": [null], "city": null, "administrativeArea": null, "postalCode": null, "country": null}], "links": [{"href": null}]}, {"organization": "Leibniz-Institut f\u00fcr Gem\u00fcse- und Zierpflanzenbau - IGZ", "roles": ["contributor"]}], "title_alternate": "LTE: Part 25/25, table: Experiment Setting"}, "links": [{"href": "https://maps.bonares.de/mapapps/resources/apps/bonares/index.html?lang=en&mid=", "rel": "download"}, {"href": "https://metadata.bonares.de:443/smartEditor/preview/Sellerie_2016.JPG", "name": "preview", "description": "Web image thumbnail (URL)", "protocol": "WWW:LINK-1.0-http--image-thumbnail", "rel": "preview"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/03b52930-0210-4bfc-a4ac-75f7544ce7a5", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "a2fbdaab-010f-4778-840b-27e9f1b002dd", "name": "item", "description": "a2fbdaab-010f-4778-840b-27e9f1b002dd", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/a2fbdaab-010f-4778-840b-27e9f1b002dd"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2024-08-27T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "03b52930-0210-4bfc-a4ac-75f7544ce7a5", "type": "Feature", "geometry": {"type": "Polygon", "coordinates": [[[13.26, 52.31], [13.26, 52.4], [13.38, 52.4], [13.38, 52.31], [13.26, 52.31]]]}, "properties": {"themes": [{"concepts": [{"id": "farming"}], "scheme": "https://standards.iso.org/iso/19139/resources/gmxCodelists.xml#MD_TopicCategoryCode"}, {"concepts": [{"id": "horticulture"}, {"id": "long-term experiments"}, {"id": "vegetable crops"}, {"id": "fertilization"}, {"id": "fertilizers"}, {"id": "soil types"}, {"id": "soil fertility"}, {"id": "soil organic carbon"}, {"id": "soil organic matter"}, {"id": "field crops"}, {"id": "crop management"}, {"id": "crop production"}, {"id": "crop rotation"}, {"id": "crop residues"}, {"id": "crop residue management"}, {"id": "crop yield"}, {"id": "nutrient balance"}, {"id": "nutrient management"}, {"id": "nutrient uptake"}, {"id": "nutrient use efficiency"}, {"id": "nutrient utilization"}, {"id": "nitrogen"}, {"id": "nitrogen balance"}, {"id": "nitrogen content"}, {"id": "nitrogen fertilizers"}, {"id": "nitrogen-use efficiency"}, {"id": "potassium"}, {"id": "phosphorus"}, {"id": "magnesium"}, {"id": "cucumbers"}, {"id": "Cucumis"}, {"id": "Cucumis sativus"}, {"id": "carrots"}, {"id": "Daucus carota"}, {"id": "cabbages"}, {"id": "Brassica oleracea var. capitata"}, {"id": "leeks"}, {"id": "Allium ampeloprasum"}, {"id": "celery"}, {"id": "Apium graveolens"}, {"id": "Apium graveolens var. rapaceum"}, {"id": "farmyard manure"}, {"id": "organic amendments"}, {"id": "organic fertilizers"}, {"id": "slurry"}, {"id": "bark mulches"}, {"id": "resource management"}, {"id": "Luvisols"}, {"id": "Fluvisols"}, {"id": "Phaeozems"}], "scheme": "AGROVOC Multilingual agricultural thesaurus"}, {"concepts": [{"id": "opendata"}], "scheme": "Individual"}, {"concepts": [{"id": "Boden"}, {"id": "agricultural management"}, {"id": "horticulture"}, {"id": "crop production"}, {"id": "crop rotation"}, {"id": "crop waste"}, {"id": "cultivation"}, {"id": "cultivation system"}, {"id": "cultivation method"}, {"id": "food production (agriculture)"}, {"id": "irrigation farming"}, {"id": "manure"}, {"id": "mineral fertiliser"}, {"id": "nitrogenous fertiliser"}, {"id": "organic fertiliser"}, {"id": "soil fertilisation"}, {"id": "soil fertility"}, {"id": "vegetable"}, {"id": "vegetable cultivation"}, {"id": "vegetable waste"}, {"id": "yield (agricultural)"}, {"id": "resource utilisation"}, {"id": "organic matter"}, {"id": "phosphate"}], "scheme": "GEMET - Concepts, version 2.4"}], "rights": "Restrictions applied to assure the protection of privacy or intellectual property, and any special restrictions or limitations or warnings on using the resource or metadata. Reports, articles, papers, scientific and non - scientific works of any form, including tables, maps, or any other kind of output, in printed or electronic form, based in whole or in part on the data supplied, must contain an acknowledgement of the form: \"Data reused from the BonaRes Data Centre www.bonares.de. This data were created as part of the Other's research activities.\" Although every care has been taken in preparing and testing the data, the Other and the BonaRes Data Centre cannot guarantee that the data are correct; neither does the Other and the BonaRes Data Centre accept any liability whatsoever for any error, missing data or omission in the data, or for any loss or damage arising from its use. The Other and BonaRes Data Centre will not be responsible for any direct or indirect use which might be made of the data.", "updated": "2025-05-12", "type": "Dataset", "created": "2024-08-20", "language": "eng", "title": "50 years box plot experiment in Grossbeeren (1972 - 2022) - Plots", "description": "The Box Plot Experiment in Grossbeeren was set up in 1972 to investigate the effect of different fertilization strategies within an irrigated vegetable crop rotation system for three different soils. Therefore, this vegetable long-term fertilization experiment can be used to investigate different plant-soil-systems under the same climatic conditions. The experimented was halted in 2022. The experimental site (52\u00b021\u201901.30\u2019\u2019 N, 13\u00b019\u201905.47\u2019\u2019 E, 50 m a.s.l.) is located in the transition zone between the more maritime-affected Northern German Plain and the continental climate of the European mainland. Weather data were collected in an agrometeorological station close to the experimental area. The long-term means (1991-2020) for air temperature and annual precipitation are 9.7 \u00b0C and 492 mm. The single plots are quadratic concrete boxes with walls of 10 cm thickness, a surface area of 4 m2 and a depth of 75 cm. The upper 50 cm are filled with the tested soils; the lower 25 cm comprises a coarse-sandy drainage layer. The three soil types are Arenic Luvisol (weak loamy sand), Gleyic Fluvisol (heavy sandy loam) and Luvic-Phaeozem (medium clayey silt) according to the World Reference Base \u2013 WRB (and the Bodenkundliche Kartieranleitung \u2013 KA4). Within 10 rotations, the vegetable species white cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata f. alba), carrot (Daucus carota L.), cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.), leek (Allium porrum L.) and celery (Apium graveolens L. var. rapaceum Mill.) were cultivated. No celery was cultivated during the first rotation. The experiment consists of 12 fertilization treatments in different combinations of mineral N fertilization and organic amendments and as quadruplicate for each of the three soils. The experimental set-up scheme can be found in the supplementary material. Mineral N fertilizer was applied as calcium ammonium nitrate. Mineral P and K fertilization was uniform for all treatments. Total N and total C in soil, plant and organic amendments were determined using a CNS analyser VARIO El (Elemental Hanau) since 1995 and before by wet combustion with K2Cr2O7 und H2SO4. C and N in the soil samples and N in the plant samples were analysed annually. The C contents of the crop residues (leaf + stalk + root) of the five vegetable species were investigated irregularly. In autumn, the soil was annually dug up to 20 cm by using a spade. Weeds were removed by a combination of mechanical (cultivator, rake or hoe) and chemical measures. Insect protection nets, insecticides or fungicides were used where necessary. Approximately 150 mm per year was additionally irrigated with a sprinkler system. More details about the experiment\u2019s description can be found in the supplementary material. Description of table 1\n\nRelated datasets are listed in the metadata element 'Related Identifier'.\nDataset version 1.0", "formats": [{"name": "CSV"}], "keywords": ["horticulture", "long-term experiments", "vegetable crops", "fertilization", "fertilizers", "soil types", "soil fertility", "soil organic carbon", "soil organic matter", "field crops", "crop management", "crop production", "crop rotation", "crop residues", "crop residue management", "crop yield", "nutrient balance", "nutrient management", "nutrient uptake", "nutrient use efficiency", "nutrient utilization", "nitrogen", "nitrogen balance", "nitrogen content", "nitrogen fertilizers", "nitrogen-use efficiency", "potassium", "phosphorus", "magnesium", "cucumbers", "Cucumis", "Cucumis sativus", "carrots", "Daucus carota", "cabbages", "Brassica oleracea var. capitata", "leeks", "Allium ampeloprasum", "celery", "Apium graveolens", "Apium graveolens var. rapaceum", "farmyard manure", "organic amendments", "organic fertilizers", "slurry", "bark mulches", "resource management", "Luvisols", "Fluvisols", "Phaeozems", "opendata", "Boden", "agricultural management", "horticulture", "crop production", "crop rotation", "crop waste", "cultivation", "cultivation system", "cultivation method", "food production (agriculture)", "irrigation farming", "manure", "mineral fertiliser", "nitrogenous fertiliser", "organic fertiliser", "soil fertilisation", "soil fertility", "vegetable", "vegetable cultivation", "vegetable waste", "yield (agricultural)", "resource utilisation", "organic matter", "phosphate"], "contacts": [{"name": "Eric B\u00f6necke", "organization": "Leibniz-Institut f\u00fcr Gem\u00fcse- und Zierpflanzenbau - IGZ", "position": null, "roles": ["author"], "phones": [{"value": null}], "emails": [{"value": "boenecke@igzev.de"}], "addresses": [{"deliveryPoint": [null], "city": null, "administrativeArea": null, "postalCode": null, "country": null}], "links": [{"href": null}]}, {"name": "Dominik M\u00fcller", "organization": "Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg", "position": null, "roles": ["author"], "phones": [{"value": null}], "emails": [{"value": "dominik.mueller2@student.uni-halle.de"}], "addresses": [{"deliveryPoint": [null], "city": null, "administrativeArea": null, "postalCode": null, "country": null}], "links": [{"href": null}]}, {"name": "J\u00f6rg R\u00fchlmann", "organization": "Leibniz-Institut f\u00fcr Gem\u00fcse- und Zierpflanzenbau - IGZ", "position": null, "roles": ["author"], "phones": [{"value": null}], "emails": [{"value": "ruehlmann@igzev.de"}], "addresses": [{"deliveryPoint": [null], "city": null, "administrativeArea": null, "postalCode": null, "country": null}], "links": [{"href": null}]}, {"name": "J\u00f6rg R\u00fchlmann", "organization": "Leibniz-Institut f\u00fcr Gem\u00fcse- und Zierpflanzenbau - IGZ", "position": null, "roles": ["projectLeader"], "phones": [{"value": null}], "emails": [{"value": "ruehlmann@igzev.de"}], "addresses": [{"deliveryPoint": [null], "city": null, "administrativeArea": null, "postalCode": null, "country": null}], "links": [{"href": null}]}, {"name": "ZALF", "organization": "Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF)", "position": "Research Platform 'Data Analysis & Simulation' - Workgroup Research Data Management", "roles": ["publisher"], "phones": [{"value": "+49 33432 82 300"}], "emails": [{"value": "dataservice@zalf.de"}], "addresses": [{"deliveryPoint": ["Eberswalder Strasse 84"], "city": "M\u00fcncheberg", "administrativeArea": "Brandenburg", "postalCode": "15374", "country": "Germany"}], "links": [{"href": null}]}, {"organization": "Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg;Leibniz-Institut f\u00fcr Gem\u00fcse- und Zierpflanzenbau - IGZ", "roles": ["contributor"]}], "title_alternate": "LTE: Part 1/25, table: Plots"}, "links": [{"href": "https://maps.bonares.de/mapapps/resources/apps/bonares/index.html?lang=en&mid=03b52930-0210-4bfc-a4ac-75f7544ce7a5", "rel": "download"}, {"href": "https://metadata.bonares.de:443/smartEditor/preview/Sellerie_2016.JPG", "name": "preview", "description": "Web image thumbnail (URL)", "protocol": "WWW:LINK-1.0-http--image-thumbnail", "rel": "preview"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/03b52930-0210-4bfc-a4ac-75f7544ce7a5", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "03b52930-0210-4bfc-a4ac-75f7544ce7a5", "name": "item", "description": "03b52930-0210-4bfc-a4ac-75f7544ce7a5", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/03b52930-0210-4bfc-a4ac-75f7544ce7a5"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2025-05-12T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "689f10b1-ff96-43c9-b871-4cfcbad5aca2", "type": "Feature", "geometry": {"type": "Polygon", "coordinates": [[[13.32, 52.35], [13.32, 52.35], [13.32, 52.35], [13.32, 52.35], [13.32, 52.35]]]}, "properties": {"themes": [{"concepts": [{"id": "farming"}], "scheme": "https://standards.iso.org/iso/19139/resources/gmxCodelists.xml#MD_TopicCategoryCode"}, {"concepts": [{"id": "horticulture"}, {"id": "long-term experiments"}, {"id": "vegetable crops"}, {"id": "fertilization"}, {"id": "fertilizers"}, {"id": "soil types"}, {"id": "soil fertility"}, {"id": "soil organic carbon"}, {"id": "soil organic matter"}, {"id": "field crops"}, {"id": "crop management"}, {"id": "crop production"}, {"id": "crop rotation"}, {"id": "crop residues"}, {"id": "crop residue management"}, {"id": "crop yield"}, {"id": "nutrient balance"}, {"id": "nutrient management"}, {"id": "nutrient uptake"}, {"id": "nutrient use efficiency"}, {"id": "nutrient utilization"}, {"id": "nitrogen"}, {"id": "nitrogen balance"}, {"id": "nitrogen content"}, {"id": "nitrogen fertilizers"}, {"id": "nitrogen-use efficiency"}, {"id": "potassium"}, {"id": "phosphorus"}, {"id": "magnesium"}, {"id": "cucumbers"}, {"id": "Cucumis"}, {"id": "Cucumis sativus"}, {"id": "carrots"}, {"id": "Daucus carota"}, {"id": "cabbages"}, {"id": "Brassica oleracea var. capitata"}, {"id": "leeks"}, {"id": "Allium ampeloprasum"}, {"id": "celery"}, {"id": "Apium graveolens"}, {"id": "Apium graveolens var. rapaceum"}, {"id": "farmyard manure"}, {"id": "organic amendments"}, {"id": "organic fertilizers"}, {"id": "slurry"}, {"id": "bark mulches"}, {"id": "resource management"}, {"id": "Luvisols"}, {"id": "Fluvisols"}, {"id": "Phaeozems"}], "scheme": "AGROVOC Multilingual agricultural thesaurus"}, {"concepts": [{"id": "opendata"}], "scheme": "Individual"}, {"concepts": [{"id": "Boden"}, {"id": "agricultural management"}, {"id": "horticulture"}, {"id": "crop production"}, {"id": "crop rotation"}, {"id": "crop waste"}, {"id": "cultivation"}, {"id": "cultivation system"}, {"id": "cultivation method"}, {"id": "food production (agriculture)"}, {"id": "irrigation farming"}, {"id": "manure"}, {"id": "mineral fertiliser"}, {"id": "nitrogenous fertiliser"}, {"id": "organic fertiliser"}, {"id": "soil fertilisation"}, {"id": "soil fertility"}, {"id": "vegetable"}, {"id": "vegetable cultivation"}, {"id": "vegetable waste"}, {"id": "yield (agricultural)"}, {"id": "resource utilisation"}, {"id": "organic matter"}, {"id": "phosphate"}], "scheme": "GEMET - Concepts, version 2.4"}], "rights": "Restrictions applied to assure the protection of privacy or intellectual property, and any special restrictions or limitations or warnings on using the resource or metadata. Reports, articles, papers, scientific and non - scientific works of any form, including tables, maps, or any other kind of output, in printed or electronic form, based in whole or in part on the data supplied, must contain an acknowledgement of the form: \"Data reused from the BonaRes Data Centre www.bonares.de. This data were created as part of the Other's research activities.\" Although every care has been taken in preparing and testing the data, the Other and the BonaRes Data Centre cannot guarantee that the data are correct; neither does the Other and the BonaRes Data Centre accept any liability whatsoever for any error, missing data or omission in the data, or for any loss or damage arising from its use. The Other and BonaRes Data Centre will not be responsible for any direct or indirect use which might be made of the data.", "updated": "2024-08-27", "created": "2022-07-19", "language": "eng", "title": "50 years box plot experiment in Grossbeeren (1972 - 2022) - Test components (for statistical evaluation)", "description": "Table with information about the treatment. In the one-factorial trial a level of the factor and in the multi-factorial trial a combination of the levels of the factors\n\nGeneral description see mother table: (https://doi.org/10.20387/bonares-fd75-nca9); Related datasets are listed in the metadata element 'Related Identifier'.\nDataset version 1.0", "formats": [{"name": "CSV"}], "keywords": ["horticulture", "long-term experiments", "vegetable crops", "fertilization", "fertilizers", "soil types", "soil fertility", "soil organic carbon", "soil organic matter", "field crops", "crop management", "crop production", "crop rotation", "crop residues", "crop residue management", "crop yield", "nutrient balance", "nutrient management", "nutrient uptake", "nutrient use efficiency", "nutrient utilization", "nitrogen", "nitrogen balance", "nitrogen content", "nitrogen fertilizers", "nitrogen-use efficiency", "potassium", "phosphorus", "magnesium", "cucumbers", "Cucumis", "Cucumis sativus", "carrots", "Daucus carota", "cabbages", "Brassica oleracea var. capitata", "leeks", "Allium ampeloprasum", "celery", "Apium graveolens", "Apium graveolens var. rapaceum", "farmyard manure", "organic amendments", "organic fertilizers", "slurry", "bark mulches", "resource management", "Luvisols", "Fluvisols", "Phaeozems", "opendata", "Boden", "agricultural management", "horticulture", "crop production", "crop rotation", "crop waste", "cultivation", "cultivation system", "cultivation method", "food production (agriculture)", "irrigation farming", "manure", "mineral fertiliser", "nitrogenous fertiliser", "organic fertiliser", "soil fertilisation", "soil fertility", "vegetable", "vegetable cultivation", "vegetable waste", "yield (agricultural)", "resource utilisation", "organic matter", "phosphate"], "contacts": [{"name": "Eric B\u00f6necke", "organization": "Leibniz-Institut f\u00fcr Gem\u00fcse- und Zierpflanzenbau - IGZ", "position": null, "roles": ["author"], "phones": [{"value": null}], "emails": [{"value": "boenecke@igzev.de"}], "addresses": [{"deliveryPoint": [null], "city": null, "administrativeArea": null, "postalCode": null, "country": null}], "links": [{"href": null}]}, {"name": "Dominik M\u00fcller", "organization": "Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg", "position": null, "roles": ["projectLeader"], "phones": [{"value": null}], "emails": [{"value": "dominik.mueller2@student.uni-halle.de"}], "addresses": [{"deliveryPoint": [null], "city": null, "administrativeArea": null, "postalCode": null, "country": null}], "links": [{"href": null}]}, {"name": "ZALF", "organization": "Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF)", "position": "Research Platform 'Data Analysis & Simulation' - Workgroup Research Data Management", "roles": ["publisher"], "phones": [{"value": "+49 33432 82 300"}], "emails": [{"value": "dataservice@zalf.de"}], "addresses": [{"deliveryPoint": ["Eberswalder Strasse 84"], "city": "M\u00fcncheberg", "administrativeArea": "Brandenburg", "postalCode": "15374", "country": "Germany"}], "links": [{"href": null}]}, {"name": "J\u00f6rg R\u00fchlmann", "organization": "Leibniz-Institut f\u00fcr Gem\u00fcse- und Zierpflanzenbau - IGZ", "position": null, "roles": ["author"], "phones": [{"value": null}], "emails": [{"value": "ruehlmann@igzev.de"}], "addresses": [{"deliveryPoint": [null], "city": null, "administrativeArea": null, "postalCode": null, "country": null}], "links": [{"href": null}]}, {"organization": "Leibniz-Institut f\u00fcr Gem\u00fcse- und Zierpflanzenbau - IGZ", "roles": ["contributor"]}], "title_alternate": "LTE: Part 22/25, table: Test components (for statistical evaluation)"}, "links": [{"href": "https://maps.bonares.de/mapapps/resources/apps/bonares/index.html?lang=en&mid=", "rel": "download"}, {"href": "https://metadata.bonares.de:443/smartEditor/preview/Sellerie_2016.JPG", "name": "preview", "description": "Web image thumbnail (URL)", "protocol": "WWW:LINK-1.0-http--image-thumbnail", "rel": "preview"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/03b52930-0210-4bfc-a4ac-75f7544ce7a5", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "689f10b1-ff96-43c9-b871-4cfcbad5aca2", "name": "item", "description": "689f10b1-ff96-43c9-b871-4cfcbad5aca2", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/689f10b1-ff96-43c9-b871-4cfcbad5aca2"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2024-08-27T00:00:00Z"}}], "links": [{"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "This document as GeoJSON", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items?keywords=slurry&f=json", "hreflang": "en-US"}, {"rel": "alternate", "type": "text/html", "title": "This document as HTML", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items?keywords=slurry&f=html", "hreflang": "en-US"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection URL", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main", "hreflang": "en-US"}, {"type": "application/geo+json", "rel": "first", "title": "items (first)", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items?keywords=slurry&", "hreflang": "en-US"}, {"rel": "last", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "items (last)", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items?keywords=slurry&offset=20", "hreflang": "en-US"}], "numberMatched": 20, "numberReturned": 20, "distributedFeatures": [], "timeStamp": "2026-07-28T15:56:17.800311Z"}