{"type": "FeatureCollection", "features": [{"id": "10.1007/s13593-022-00864-7", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-05-24T16:15:14Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2023-02-01", "title": "Sustainable soil management measures: a synthesis of stakeholder recommendations", "description": "Abstract<p>Soil degradation threatens agricultural production and soil multifunctionality. Efforts for private and public governance are increasingly emerging to leverage sustainable soil management. They require consensus across science, policy, and practice about what sustainable soil management entails. Such agreement does not yet exist to a sufficient extent in agronomic terms; what is lacking is a concise list of soil management measures that enjoy broad support among all stakeholders, and evidence on the question what hampers their implementation by farmers. We therefore screened stakeholder documents from public governance institutions, nongovernmental organizations, the agricultural industry, and conventional and organic farmer associations for recommendations related to agricultural soil management in Germany. Out of 46 recommended measures in total, we compiled a shortlist of the seven most consensual ones: (1) structural landscape elements, (2) organic fertilization, (3) diversified crop rotation, (4) permanent soil cover, (5) conservation tillage, (6) reduced soil loads, and (7) optimized timing of wheeling. Together, these measures support all agricultural soil functions, and address all major soil threats except soil contamination. Implementation barriers were identified with the aid of an online survey among farmers (n = 78). Results showed that a vast majority of farmers (&gt; 80%) approved of all measures. Barriers were mostly considered to be economic and in some cases technological, while missing knowledge or other factors were less relevant. Barriers were stronger for those measures that cannot be implemented in isolation, but require a systemic diversification of the production system. This is especially the case for measures that are simultaneously beneficial to many soil functions (measures 2, 3, and 4). Results confirm the need for a diversification of the agricultural system in order to meet challenges of food security and climate change. The shortlist presents the first integrative compilation of sustainable soil management measures supporting the design of effective public or private governance.</p>", "keywords": ["2. Zero hunger", "Dewey Decimal Classification::600 | Technik::630 | Landwirtschaft", " Veterin\u00e4rmedizin", "Diversification in agriculture", "Agriculture in transition", " Diversification in agriculture", " Soil functions", " Soil health", " Sustainable soil management", " Stakeholder recommendations", "Sustainable soil management", "04 agricultural and veterinary sciences", "15. Life on land", "Soil functions", "Agriculture in transition", "01 natural sciences", "soil functions ; sustainable soil management ; agriculture in transition ; diversifcation in agriculture ; soil health ; stakeholder recommendations", "12. Responsible consumption", "[SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio]", "Dewey Decimal Classification::500 | Naturwissenschaften::580 | Pflanzen (Botanik)", "13. Climate action", "Soil health", "11. Sustainability", "0401 agriculture", " forestry", " and fisheries", "Dewey Decimal Classification::600 | Technik::640 | Hauswirtschaft und Familienleben", "Stakeholder recommendations", "0105 earth and related environmental sciences"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13593-022-00864-7.pdf"}, {"href": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00864-7"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Agronomy%20for%20Sustainable%20Development", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.1007/s13593-022-00864-7", "name": "item", "description": "10.1007/s13593-022-00864-7", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.1007/s13593-022-00864-7"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2023-02-01T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.1111/ejss.13439", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-05-24T16:18:24Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2023-11-28", "title": "Sustainable soil management: Soil knowledge use and gaps in Europe", "description": "Abstract                   <p>Soils are the foundation of agricultural production, ecosystem functioning and human well\uffe2\uff80\uff90being. Bridging soil knowledge gaps and improving the knowledge system is crucial to meet the growing EU soil policy ambitions in the face of climate change and the ongoing trend in soil degradation. The objective of this article is to assess the current state of knowledge, knowledge use and knowledge gaps concerning sustainable soil management in Europe. This study is based on interviews with 791 stakeholders and 254 researchers and on a comprehensive review of &gt;1800 documents carried out under the European Joint Programme on agricultural soils. Despite differences in stakeholder groups, the conclusions are rather consistent and complementary. We identified major knowledge gaps with respect to (1) soil carbon stocks, (2) soil degradation and fertility and (3) strategies for improved soil management. Transcending these three areas, particularly the loss of soil organic carbon, peatland degradation and soil compaction, are most critical, thus, we stress the urgency of developing more models and monitoring programmes on soils. Stakeholders further report that insufficient transfer of existing soil research findings to practitioners is a hindrance to the adoption of sustainable soil management practices. In addition to knowledge production, soil knowledge gaps may be addressed by considering seven recommendations from the stakeholders: (1) raising awareness, (2) strengthening knowledge brokers, (3) improving relevance of research activities and resource allocation for land users, (4) peer\uffe2\uff80\uff90to\uffe2\uff80\uff90peer communication, (5) targeting advice and information, (6) improving knowledge access, and (7) providing incentives. We argue that filling and bridging knowledge gaps should be a priority for policymakers and the insights provided in the article may help prioritise research and dissemination needs enabling a transition to more sustainable soil management in Europe.</p", "keywords": ["[SDE] Environmental Sciences", "ta1172", "Sustainable soil management", "sustainable soil management", "[SDV.SA.SDS]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences/Soil study", "630", "333", "12. Responsible consumption", "Soil policy", "Soil health", "11. Sustainability", "soil policy", "[SDV.SA.SDS] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences/Soil study", "stakeholder involvement", "2. Zero hunger", "EJP SOIL", "soil health", "9. Industry and infrastructure", "Soil policy Highlights", "soil use challenges", "ta4111", "15. Life on land", "6. Clean water", "13. Climate action", "[SDE]Environmental Sciences", "JP SOIL", "Stakeholder involvement", "Soil use challenges"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-04621243/file/Thors%C3%B8e%20et%20al%202023%20post%20print.pdf"}, {"href": "https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.13439"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/European%20Journal%20of%20Soil%20Science", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.1111/ejss.13439", "name": "item", "description": "10.1111/ejss.13439", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.1111/ejss.13439"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2023-11-01T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.1111/ejss.13483", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-05-24T16:18:24Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2024-04-25", "title": "Towards enhanced adoption of soil\u2010improving management practices in Europe", "description": "Abstract<p>Sustainable agricultural soil management practices are key to restore, maintain and improve soil health. The European Joint Programme for SOIL (EJP SOIL) has identified twelve main soil challenges in Europe. To assess the potential and eventually increase the adoption of soil\uffe2\uff80\uff90improving management practices, it is necessary to know (i) the current levels of adoption of the practices, (ii) socio\uffe2\uff80\uff90technical barriers influencing their adoption, and (iii) their bio\uffe2\uff80\uff90physical limits. This study compiled an inventory of soil\uffe2\uff80\uff90improving management practices relevant to European conditions, and used a survey among soil scientists to assess the levels of adoption of these practices in Europe. In total, 53 soil management practices were identified that address one or several of the soil challenges. The adoption of most practices was low or spatially heterogeneous across Europe, highlighting region\uffe2\uff80\uff90specific limitations to sustainable soil management. Qualitative interviews were conducted to explore the importance of socio\uffe2\uff80\uff90technical aspects of adoption. Using conservation agriculture as an example, factors that can hinder adoption included the availability of knowledge and adequate machinery, financial risks, and farming traditions. Through a modelling approach, 54% of arable land in Europe was found to be suitable for cover cropping, indicating that the adoption of soil management practices is frequently limited by climatic constraints. We propose a region\uffe2\uff80\uff90specific approach that recognizes the importance of identifying and overcoming socio\uffe2\uff80\uff90technical barriers, and by acknowledging bio\uffe2\uff80\uff90physical limits that may be expanded by innovation.</p", "keywords": ["Conservation agriculture", "Sustainable soil management", "sustainable soil management", "[SDV.SA.SDS]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences/Soil study", "Soil degradation", "630", "333", "12. Responsible consumption", "Soil challenges", "soil degradation", "Soil health", "11. Sustainability", "Life Science", "Soil threats", "[SDV.SA.SDS] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences/Soil study", "Soil restoration", "2. Zero hunger", "EJP SOIL", "soil health", "Cover crops", "15. Life on land", "soil threats", "soil challenges", "6. Clean water", "conservation agriculture", "13. Climate action", "soil restoration", "cover crops"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.13483"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/European%20Journal%20of%20Soil%20Science", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.1111/ejss.13483", "name": "item", "description": "10.1111/ejss.13483", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.1111/ejss.13483"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2024-03-01T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.1111/ejss.13476", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-05-24T16:18:24Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2024-03-22", "title": "Do we speak one language on the way to sustainable soil management in Europe? A terminology check via an EU\u2010wide survey", "description": "Abstract<p>European soils are under increasing pressure, making it difficult to maintain the provision of soil ecosystem services (SESs). A better understanding of soil processes is needed to counteract soil threats (STs) and to promote sustainable soil management. The EJP SOIL programme of the EU provides a framework for the necessary research. However, different definitions of soil\uffe2\uff80\uff90related terms potentially lead to varied understandings of concepts. Furthermore, there are numerous indicators available to quantify STs or SESs. As unclear communication is a key barrier that hinders the implementation of research results into practice, this study aimed to answer the question about whether the terminology of large\uffe2\uff80\uff90scale initiatives is adequately understood within the soil\uffe2\uff80\uff90science community and non\uffe2\uff80\uff90research stakeholders. An online questionnaire was used to provide definitions for 33 soil\uffe2\uff80\uff90related terms in both scientific and plain language, as well as indicators for seven SESs and 11 STs. Participants were asked to rate their agreement with the definitions and indicators on a seven\uffe2\uff80\uff90grade Likert scale. The level of agreement was calculated as the percentage of ratings above 4, the neutral position. The survey was available from June to September 2023 and was distributed by a snowball approach. More than 260 stakeholders assessed the survey; 70% of respondents were researchers, and 15% were practitioners. Mean agreement levels for the definitions and indicators were generally high, at 85% and 78% respectively. However, it was apparent that the lowest agreement was found for terms that are relatively new, such as Ecosystem Services and Bundle, or unfamiliar for certain subgroups, such as ecological terms for stakeholders working at the farm scale. Due to their distinct majority, the results of this study primarily reflect the opinions of scientists. Thus, broad conclusions can only be drawn by comparing scientists with non\uffe2\uff80\uff90scientists. In this regard, the agreement was surprisingly high across all types of questions. The combined outcomes indicate that there is still a need to facilitate communication between stakeholders and to improve knowledge distribution strategies. Nevertheless, this study can support and be used by future projects and programmes, especially regarding the harmonization of terminology and methods.</p", "keywords": ["Soilbased ecosystem services", "Soil policy stakeholders", "soil science terminology", "soil indicators", "610", "Sustainable soil management", "sustainable soil management", "[SDV.SA.SDS]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences/Soil study", "333", "12. Responsible consumption", "soil policy stakeholders", "Soil science terminology", "11. Sustainability", "Soil indicators", "Soil threats", "soil-based ecosystem services", "[SDV.SA.SDS] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences/Soil study", "2. Zero hunger", "EJP SOIL", "4. Education", "15. Life on land", "soil threats", "16. Peace & justice", "6. Clean water", "EJP SOIL", " soil indicators", " soil policy stakeholders", " soil science terminology", " soil threats", " soilbased ecosystem services", " sustainable soil management", "13. Climate action", "soil- based ecosystem services"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://iris.cnr.it/bitstream/20.500.14243/467822/1/European%20J%20Soil%20Science%20-%202024%20-%20Weninger%20-%20Do%20we%20speak%20one%20language%20on%20the%20way%20to%20sustainable%20soil%20management%20in%20Europe%20%20A.pdf"}, {"href": "https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.13476"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/European%20Journal%20of%20Soil%20Science", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.1111/ejss.13476", "name": "item", "description": "10.1111/ejss.13476", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.1111/ejss.13476"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2024-03-01T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.17221/136/2021-swr", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-05-24T16:19:27Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2022-01-11", "title": "An overview of a land evaluation in the context of ecosystem services", "description": "The environment is changing quickly and it is ever more burdened in connection with the greater needs of human society. This fact has increased efforts to improve the management of land and natural resources and the necessity to evaluate them. Land valuations become more important as the land consumption increases. Soil needs to be evaluated in the whole context of how its quality is affected and the values it provides. The concept of ecosystem services offers this holistic view. This paper defines ecosystem services (ES), the various linkages between soil properties, their functions and benefits, the assessment of soil quality using indicators and then briefly mentions EU environmental assessment methods and terms used in the context of ES. The article also mentions frameworks with which to assess and evaluate the soil quality that can be divided into two groups. The first group is comprised of a framework of indicators that describe the current state of the soil system assessment for evaluating the quality of the agricultural land. This is based on a detailed measurement of the terrain, a statistical analysis of soil databases or processing the status of specific threats to the soil. The second group is comprised of a framework of indicators focused on changes in the soil quality and applied soil management. These frameworks deal with the productivity of the soil in various systems of farming, compare agricultural systems or discuss the advantages of soil biota as indicators of soil quality in detail. Many of the designs of the soil quality indicators focus on the soil management in the context of a single discipline such as agriculture or water pollution. There are concepts for considering the soil quality in regional planning.", "keywords": ["S", "boks index", "0401 agriculture", " forestry", " and fisheries", "Agriculture", "soil quality", "sustainable soil management", "04 agricultural and veterinary sciences", "soil functions", "01 natural sciences", "squid index", "0105 earth and related environmental sciences"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10.17221/136/2021-swr"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Soil%20and%20Water%20Research", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.17221/136/2021-swr", "name": "item", "description": "10.17221/136/2021-swr", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.17221/136/2021-swr"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2022-01-17T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.15488/15460", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-05-24T16:19:20Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2023-02-01", "title": "Sustainable soil management measures: a synthesis of stakeholder recommendations", "description": "Abstract<p>Soil degradation threatens agricultural production and soil multifunctionality. Efforts for private and public governance are increasingly emerging to leverage sustainable soil management. They require consensus across science, policy, and practice about what sustainable soil management entails. Such agreement does not yet exist to a sufficient extent in agronomic terms; what is lacking is a concise list of soil management measures that enjoy broad support among all stakeholders, and evidence on the question what hampers their implementation by farmers. We therefore screened stakeholder documents from public governance institutions, nongovernmental organizations, the agricultural industry, and conventional and organic farmer associations for recommendations related to agricultural soil management in Germany. Out of 46 recommended measures in total, we compiled a shortlist of the seven most consensual ones: (1) structural landscape elements, (2) organic fertilization, (3) diversified crop rotation, (4) permanent soil cover, (5) conservation tillage, (6) reduced soil loads, and (7) optimized timing of wheeling. Together, these measures support all agricultural soil functions, and address all major soil threats except soil contamination. Implementation barriers were identified with the aid of an online survey among farmers (n = 78). Results showed that a vast majority of farmers (&gt; 80%) approved of all measures. Barriers were mostly considered to be economic and in some cases technological, while missing knowledge or other factors were less relevant. Barriers were stronger for those measures that cannot be implemented in isolation, but require a systemic diversification of the production system. This is especially the case for measures that are simultaneously beneficial to many soil functions (measures 2, 3, and 4). Results confirm the need for a diversification of the agricultural system in order to meet challenges of food security and climate change. The shortlist presents the first integrative compilation of sustainable soil management measures supporting the design of effective public or private governance.</p", "keywords": ["2. Zero hunger", "Dewey Decimal Classification::600 | Technik::630 | Landwirtschaft", " Veterin\u00e4rmedizin", "Diversification in agriculture", "Sustainable soil management", "04 agricultural and veterinary sciences", "15. Life on land", "Soil functions", "Agriculture in transition", "01 natural sciences", "soil functions ; sustainable soil management ; agriculture in transition ; diversifcation in agriculture ; soil health ; stakeholder recommendations", "12. Responsible consumption", "[SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio]", "Dewey Decimal Classification::500 | Naturwissenschaften::580 | Pflanzen (Botanik)", "13. Climate action", "Soil health", "11. Sustainability", "0401 agriculture", " forestry", " and fisheries", "Dewey Decimal Classification::600 | Technik::640 | Hauswirtschaft und Familienleben", "Stakeholder recommendations", "0105 earth and related environmental sciences"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13593-022-00864-7.pdf"}, {"href": "https://doi.org/10.15488/15460"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Agronomy%20for%20Sustainable%20Development", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.15488/15460", "name": "item", "description": "10.15488/15460", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.15488/15460"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2023-02-01T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.3390/agriculture11070583", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-05-24T16:20:19Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2021-06-24", "title": "Soil Health Evaluation of Farmland Based on Functional Soil Management\u2014A Case Study of Yixing City, Jiangsu Province, China", "description": "<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><article><p>Given that farmland serves as a strategic resource to ensure national food security, blind emphasis on the improvement of food production capacity can lead to soil overutilization and impair other soil functions. Hence, the evaluation of soil health (SH) should comprehensively take soil productivity and ecological environmental effects into account. In this study, five functions from the perspective of functional soil management were summarized, including primary productivity, provision and cycling of nutrients, the provision of functional and intrinsic biodiversity, water purification and regulation, and carbon sequestration and regulation. For each soil function, in view of the natural and ameliorable conditions affecting SH, basic indicators were selected from the two aspects of inherent and dynamic properties, and restrictive indicators were chosen considering the external properties or environmental elements, with the minimum limiting factor method coupled with weighted linear model. The new evaluation system was tested and verified in Yixing City, China. The healthy and optimally functional soils were concentrated in the northeast and mid-west of Yixing City, whereas unhealthy soils were predominant in the south and around Taihu Lake. The main limitations to SH improvement included cation exchange capacity, nutrient elements, and soluble carbon. The SH evaluation method was verified using the crop performance validation method, and a positive correlation was noted between food production stability index and soil health index, indicating that the evaluation system is reasonable.</p></article>", "keywords": ["2. Zero hunger", "soil obstacles", "soil health", "Agriculture (General)", "0401 agriculture", " forestry", " and fisheries", "sustainable soil management", "04 agricultural and veterinary sciences", "15. Life on land", "soil multifunctionality", "6. Clean water", "S1-972", "soil ecosystem services", "12. Responsible consumption"]}, "links": [{"href": "http://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/7/583/pdf"}, {"href": "https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11070583"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Agriculture", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.3390/agriculture11070583", "name": "item", "description": "10.3390/agriculture11070583", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.3390/agriculture11070583"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2021-06-24T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.3390/land11050599", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-05-24T16:20:27Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2022-04-20", "title": "Do Agricultural Advisory Services in Europe Have the Capacity to Support the Transition to Healthy Soils?", "description": "<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><article><p>The need to provide appropriate information, technical advice and facilitation to support farmers in transitioning towards healthy soils is increasingly clear, and the role of the Agricultural Advisory Services (AAS) in this is critical. However, the transformation of AAS (plurality, commercialisation, fragmentation, decentralisation) brings new challenges for delivering advice to support soil health management. This paper asks: To what extent do agricultural advisory services have the capacity to support the transition to healthy soils across Europe? Using the \u2018best fit\u2019 framework, analytical characteristics of the AAS relevant to the research question (governance structures, management, organisational and individual capacities) were identified. Analysis of 18 semi-structured expert interviews across 6 case study countries in Europe, selected to represent a range of contexts, was undertaken. Capacities to provide soil health management (SHM) advice are constrained by funding arrangements, limited adviser training and professional development, adviser motivations and professional cultures, all determined by institutional conditions. This has resulted in a narrowing down of access and content of soil advice and a reduced capacity to support the transition in farming to healthy soils. The extent to which emerging policy and market drivers incentivise enhanced capacities in AAS is an important area for future research.</p></article>", "keywords": ["2. Zero hunger", "S1", "soil health", "agricultural advisers", "agricultural advisory services; soil health; governance; agricultural advisers; sustainable soil management; soil policy; advice", "S", "0211 other engineering and technologies", "Agriculture", "sustainable soil management", "04 agricultural and veterinary sciences", "02 engineering and technology", "governance", "advice", "agricultural advisory services", "S589.7_Agricultural", "0401 agriculture", " forestry", " and fisheries", "soil policy"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://eprints.glos.ac.uk/10944/3/10944-Ingram-et-al-%282022%29-Do-Agricultural-Advisory-Services.pdf"}, {"href": "http://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/5/599/pdf"}, {"href": "https://doi.org/10.3390/land11050599"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Land", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.3390/land11050599", "name": "item", "description": "10.3390/land11050599", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.3390/land11050599"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2022-04-19T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.3390/land11060780", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-05-24T16:20:28Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2022-05-25", "title": "Soil-Improving Cropping Systems for Sustainable and Profitable Farming in Europe", "description": "<p>Soils form the basis for agricultural production and other ecosystem services, and soil management should aim at improving their quality and resilience. Within the SoilCare project, the concept of soil-improving cropping systems (SICS) was developed as a holistic approach to facilitate the adoption of soil management that is sustainable and profitable. SICS selected with stakeholders were monitored and evaluated for environmental, sociocultural, and economic effects to determine profitability and sustainability. Monitoring results were upscaled to European level using modelling and Europe-wide data, and a mapping tool was developed to assist in selection of appropriate SICS across Europe. Furthermore, biophysical, sociocultural, economic, and policy reasons for (non)adoption were studied. Results at the plot/farm scale showed a small positive impact of SICS on environment and soil, no effect on sustainability, and small negative impacts on economic and sociocultural dimensions. Modelling showed that different SICS had different impacts across Europe\uffe2\uff80\uff94indicating the importance of understanding local dynamics in Europe-wide assessments. Work on adoption of SICS confirmed the role economic considerations play in the uptake of SICS, but also highlighted social factors such as trust. The project\uffe2\uff80\uff99s results underlined the need for policies that support and enable a transition to more sustainable agricultural practices in a coherent way.</p>", "keywords": ["S1", "Soil Science", "crop management", "sustainable soil management", "S589.75_Agriculture", "01 natural sciences", "12. Responsible consumption", "soil quality; sustainable soil management; adoption; crop management; environmental dimension; sociocultural dimension; economic dimension", "11. Sustainability", "Life Science", "soil quality", "910 Geography & travel", "Agricultural Science", "adoption", "550 Earth sciences & geology", "0105 earth and related environmental sciences", "2. Zero hunger", "environmental dimension", "S", "economic dimension", "Agriculture", "15. Life on land", "Environmental Sciences related to Agriculture and Land-use", "sociocultural dimension", "13. Climate action"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://eprints.glos.ac.uk/11159/1/11159%20Webb%2C%20et%20al%20%282022%29%20Soil-improving%20cropping%20systems%20for%20sustainable%20and%20profitable%20farming%20in%20Europe.pdf"}, {"href": "http://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/6/780/pdf"}, {"href": "https://pub.epsilon.slu.se/28669/1/hessel-r-et-al-220808.pdf"}, {"href": "https://boris.unibe.ch/170337/1/land-11-00780-v2.pdf"}, {"href": "https://www.research.unipd.it/bitstream/11577/3462064/1/land-11-00780.pdf"}, {"href": "https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/6/780/pdf"}, {"href": "https://eprints.ncl.ac.uk/fulltext.aspx?url=282070/A8C9E72D-16C8-421E-A19E-B021CC82D589.pdf&pub_id=282070"}, {"href": "https://doi.org/10.3390/land11060780"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Land", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.3390/land11060780", "name": "item", "description": "10.3390/land11060780", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.3390/land11060780"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2022-05-25T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.3390/land11060943", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-05-24T16:20:28Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2022-06-19", "title": "The Effects of Soil Improving Cropping Systems (SICS) on Soil Erosion and Soil Organic Carbon Stocks across Europe: A Simulation Study", "description": "<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><article><p>Healthy soils are fundamental for sustainable agriculture. Soil Improving Cropping Systems (SICS) aim to make land use and food production more sustainable. To evaluate the effect of SICS at EU scale, a modelling approach was taken. This study simulated the effects of SICS on two principal indicators of soil health (Soil Organic Carbon stocks) and land degradation (soil erosion) across Europe using the spatially explicit PESERA model. Four scenarios with varying levels and combinations of cover crops, mulching, soil compaction alleviation and minimum tillage were implemented and simulated until 2050. Results showed that while in the scenario without SICS, erosion slightly increased on average across Europe, it significantly decreased in the scenario with the highest level of SICS applied, especially in the cropping areas in the central European Loess Belt. Regarding SOC stocks, the simulations show a substantial decrease for the scenario without SICS and a slight overall decrease for the medium level scenario and the scenario with a mix of high, medium and no SICS. The scenario with a high level of SICS implementation showed an overall increase in SOC stocks across Europe. Potential future improvements include incorporating dynamic land use, climate change and an optimal spatial allocation of SICS.</p></article>", "keywords": ["2. Zero hunger", "soil erosion", "soil health", "S", "scenarios", "0211 other engineering and technologies", "large-scale modelling; Europe; soil health; SOC stocks; soil erosion; scenarios; sustainable soil management", "Agriculture", "sustainable soil management", "02 engineering and technology", "15. Life on land", "large-scale modelling", "SOC stocks", "01 natural sciences", "7. Clean energy", "12. Responsible consumption", "Europe", "13. Climate action", "11. Sustainability", "0105 earth and related environmental sciences"]}, "links": [{"href": "http://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/6/943/pdf"}, {"href": "https://doi.org/10.3390/land11060943"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Land", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.3390/land11060943", "name": "item", "description": "10.3390/land11060943", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.3390/land11060943"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2022-06-19T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.5281/zenodo.13991800", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-05-24T16:21:51Z", "type": "Report", "title": "Swiss Farmers' Views on the Role of Soil Management to Mitigate Impacts of Droughts and Extreme Precipitation", "description": "Extreme weather events, such as severe droughts and intense rainfall, pose growing threats to crop production and soil health across Europe. Integrating sustainable soil management practices can enhance farm resilience and improve soil health. Farmers' decision-making regarding soil management practices is influenced by various context-specific factors, including environmental values and economic considerations. Understanding these factors is essential for promoting sustainable management practices. Through analysis, this study identifies three main perspectives among Swiss farmers: the 'Sustainable Farmer,' the 'Pragmatic Farmer,' and the 'Market-Focused Traditionalist.' The findings highlight how context-specific factors shape soil management choices of farmers. Results suggest that policy measures tailored to farmers\u2019 unique contexts can support conservation practices and foster knowledge sharing.", "keywords": ["Soil sciences", "Q Methodology", "Sustainable soil management", "Climate change adaptation", "Farmer viewpoints"], "contacts": [{"organization": "B\u00fctikofer, Nicole", "roles": ["creator"]}]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13991800"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.5281/zenodo.13991800", "name": "item", "description": "10.5281/zenodo.13991800", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.5281/zenodo.13991800"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2023-08-24T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.5281/zenodo.15763496", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-05-24T16:22:25Z", "type": "Report", "title": "Technical feasibility in using CLMS satellite-based EO to estimate soil health indicators", "description": "The slideshow contains a summary of the main results issued from PREPSOIL Task T5.2.", "keywords": ["2. Zero hunger", "Earth observation", "Technology", "Monitoring", "Scientific knowledge", "Communication", "Skills", "Sustainable soil management", "Success factors", "Healthy Soils", "15. Life on land", "PREPSOIL", "Remote Sensing", "Gaps"], "contacts": [{"organization": "Renault, Pierre, Xie, Guanyao, Weiss, Marie,", "roles": ["creator"]}]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15763496"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.5281/zenodo.15763496", "name": "item", "description": "10.5281/zenodo.15763496", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.5281/zenodo.15763496"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2024-06-28T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.5281/zenodo.5205400", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-05-24T16:22:41Z", "type": "Dataset", "title": "SOILCARE_WP_7_D7.2_Adoption factors and policy actions", "description": "Dataset accompanying D7.2: \u201cReport on the selection of good policy alternatives at EU and study site level\u201d. The file provides data collected from stakeholders at the European level as well as at national, regional and local level within the 16 SoilCare study site countries. The data set provides stakeholder views on factors enabling and hampering the uptake of Soil Improving Cropping Systems as well as actions to facilitate their adoption. The methodology for collecting the data is detailed in D7.2 available at https://www.soilcare-project.eu/resources/deliverables.", "keywords": ["2. Zero hunger", "13. Climate action", "11. Sustainability", "15. Life on land", "sustainable agricultural practices", "sustainable soil management", " adoption factors", " adoption barriers", " policy", " stakeholders"], "contacts": [{"organization": "McNeill, Alicia, Muro, Melanie, Tugran, Tugce, Lucakova, Zuzana,", "roles": ["creator"]}]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5205400"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.5281/zenodo.5205400", "name": "item", "description": "10.5281/zenodo.5205400", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.5281/zenodo.5205400"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2021-01-01T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.5281/zenodo.5205401", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-05-24T16:22:41Z", "type": "Dataset", "title": "SOILCARE_WP_7_D7.2_Adoption factors and policy actions", "description": "Dataset accompanying D7.2: \u201cReport on the selection of good policy alternatives at EU and study site level\u201d. The file provides data collected from stakeholders at the European level as well as at national, regional and local level within the 16 SoilCare study site countries. The data set provides stakeholder views on factors enabling and hampering the uptake of Soil Improving Cropping Systems as well as actions to facilitate their adoption. The methodology for collecting the data is detailed in D7.2 available at https://www.soilcare-project.eu/resources/deliverables.", "keywords": ["2. Zero hunger", "13. Climate action", "11. Sustainability", "15. Life on land", "sustainable agricultural practices", "sustainable soil management", " adoption factors", " adoption barriers", " policy", " stakeholders"], "contacts": [{"organization": "McNeill, Alicia, Muro, Melanie, Tugran, Tugce, Lucakova, Zuzana,", "roles": ["creator"]}]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5205401"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.5281/zenodo.5205401", "name": "item", "description": "10.5281/zenodo.5205401", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.5281/zenodo.5205401"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2021-01-01T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.5281/zenodo.4767189", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-05-24T16:22:40Z", "type": "Dataset", "title": "Data to support the publication The use of Twitter for knowledge exchange on sustainable soil management", "description": "5 farmer semi-structured interviews", "keywords": ["2. Zero hunger", "Social media", "Knowledge exchange", "Twitter", "Sustainable soil management", "15. Life on land", "Twitter", " social media", " sustainable soil management", " knowledge exchange"], "contacts": [{"organization": "Mills, Jane, Skaalsveen, Kamilla,", "roles": ["creator"]}]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4767189"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.5281/zenodo.4767189", "name": "item", "description": "10.5281/zenodo.4767189", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.5281/zenodo.4767189"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2021-05-17T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.5281/zenodo.6620538", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-05-24T16:22:45Z", "type": "Dataset", "title": "Data to support the publication The use of Twitter for knowledge exchange on sustainable soil management", "description": "5 farmer semi-structured interviews", "keywords": ["2. Zero hunger", "Social media", "Knowledge exchange", "Twitter", "Sustainable soil management", "15. Life on land", "Twitter", " social media", " sustainable soil management", " knowledge exchange"], "contacts": [{"organization": "Mills, Jane, Skaalsveen, Kamilla,", "roles": ["creator"]}]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6620538"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.5281/zenodo.6620538", "name": "item", "description": "10.5281/zenodo.6620538", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.5281/zenodo.6620538"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2021-05-17T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.5281/zenodo.8091189", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-05-24T16:22:57Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2021-06-24", "title": "Soil Health Evaluation of Farmland Based on Functional Soil Management\u2014A Case Study of Yixing City, Jiangsu Province, China", "description": "<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><article><p>Given that farmland serves as a strategic resource to ensure national food security, blind emphasis on the improvement of food production capacity can lead to soil overutilization and impair other soil functions. Hence, the evaluation of soil health (SH) should comprehensively take soil productivity and ecological environmental effects into account. In this study, five functions from the perspective of functional soil management were summarized, including primary productivity, provision and cycling of nutrients, the provision of functional and intrinsic biodiversity, water purification and regulation, and carbon sequestration and regulation. For each soil function, in view of the natural and ameliorable conditions affecting SH, basic indicators were selected from the two aspects of inherent and dynamic properties, and restrictive indicators were chosen considering the external properties or environmental elements, with the minimum limiting factor method coupled with weighted linear model. The new evaluation system was tested and verified in Yixing City, China. The healthy and optimally functional soils were concentrated in the northeast and mid-west of Yixing City, whereas unhealthy soils were predominant in the south and around Taihu Lake. The main limitations to SH improvement included cation exchange capacity, nutrient elements, and soluble carbon. The SH evaluation method was verified using the crop performance validation method, and a positive correlation was noted between food production stability index and soil health index, indicating that the evaluation system is reasonable.</p></article>", "keywords": ["2. Zero hunger", "soil obstacles", "soil health", "Agriculture (General)", "0401 agriculture", " forestry", " and fisheries", "sustainable soil management", "04 agricultural and veterinary sciences", "15. Life on land", "soil multifunctionality", "6. Clean water", "S1-972", "soil ecosystem services", "12. Responsible consumption"]}, "links": [{"href": "http://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/7/583/pdf"}, {"href": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8091189"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Agriculture", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.5281/zenodo.8091189", "name": "item", "description": "10.5281/zenodo.8091189", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.5281/zenodo.8091189"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2021-06-24T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "11250/3025285", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-05-24T16:24:04Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2022-04-19", "title": "Do Agricultural Advisory Services in Europe Have the Capacity to Support the Transition to Healthy Soils?", "description": "<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><article><p>The need to provide appropriate information, technical advice and facilitation to support farmers in transitioning towards healthy soils is increasingly clear, and the role of the Agricultural Advisory Services (AAS) in this is critical. However, the transformation of AAS (plurality, commercialisation, fragmentation, decentralisation) brings new challenges for delivering advice to support soil health management. This paper asks: To what extent do agricultural advisory services have the capacity to support the transition to healthy soils across Europe? Using the \u2018best fit\u2019 framework, analytical characteristics of the AAS relevant to the research question (governance structures, management, organisational and individual capacities) were identified. Analysis of 18 semi-structured expert interviews across 6 case study countries in Europe, selected to represent a range of contexts, was undertaken. Capacities to provide soil health management (SHM) advice are constrained by funding arrangements, limited adviser training and professional development, adviser motivations and professional cultures, all determined by institutional conditions. This has resulted in a narrowing down of access and content of soil advice and a reduced capacity to support the transition in farming to healthy soils. The extent to which emerging policy and market drivers incentivise enhanced capacities in AAS is an important area for future research.</p></article>", "keywords": ["S1", "KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE", "agricultural advisers", "Environmental Studies", "0211 other engineering and technologies", "Environmental Sciences & Ecology", "sustainable soil management", "02 engineering and technology", "3301 Architecture", "4104 Environmental management", "SYSTEMS", "advice", "MANAGEMENT", "S589.7_Agricultural", "0502 Environmental Science and Management", "soil policy", "METAANALYSIS", "2. Zero hunger", "Science & Technology", "CHALLENGES", "soil health", "agricultural advisory services; soil health; governance; agricultural advisers; sustainable soil management; soil policy; advice", "S", "GOVERNANCE", "3304 Urban and regional planning", "Agriculture", "04 agricultural and veterinary sciences", "POLICY", "FIT", "governance", "agricultural advisory services", "0401 agriculture", " forestry", " and fisheries", "FARM ADVISERS", "FRAGMENTATION", "Life Sciences & Biomedicine"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://eprints.glos.ac.uk/10944/3/10944-Ingram-et-al-%282022%29-Do-Agricultural-Advisory-Services.pdf"}, {"href": "http://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/5/599/pdf"}, {"href": "https://doi.org/11250/3025285"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Land", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "11250/3025285", "name": "item", "description": "11250/3025285", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/11250/3025285"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2022-04-19T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "11250/3039583", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-05-24T16:24:04Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2022-05-25", "title": "Soil-Improving Cropping Systems for Sustainable and Profitable Farming in Europe", "description": "<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><article><p>Soils form the basis for agricultural production and other ecosystem services, and soil management should aim at improving their quality and resilience. Within the SoilCare project, the concept of soil-improving cropping systems (SICS) was developed as a holistic approach to facilitate the adoption of soil management that is sustainable and profitable. SICS selected with stakeholders were monitored and evaluated for environmental, sociocultural, and economic effects to determine profitability and sustainability. Monitoring results were upscaled to European level using modelling and Europe-wide data, and a mapping tool was developed to assist in selection of appropriate SICS across Europe. Furthermore, biophysical, sociocultural, economic, and policy reasons for (non)adoption were studied. Results at the plot/farm scale showed a small positive impact of SICS on environment and soil, no effect on sustainability, and small negative impacts on economic and sociocultural dimensions. Modelling showed that different SICS had different impacts across Europe\u2014indicating the importance of understanding local dynamics in Europe-wide assessments. Work on adoption of SICS confirmed the role economic considerations play in the uptake of SICS, but also highlighted social factors such as trust. The project\u2019s results underlined the need for policies that support and enable a transition to more sustainable agricultural practices in a coherent way.</p></article>", "keywords": ["S1", "AGRICULTURE", "ADOPTION", "Environmental Studies", "YIELD GAPS", "Soil Science", "Environmental Sciences & Ecology", "crop management", "sustainable soil management", "3301 Architecture", "S589.75_Agriculture", "01 natural sciences", "12. Responsible consumption", "soil quality; sustainable soil management; adoption; crop management; environmental dimension; sociocultural dimension; economic dimension", "4104 Environmental management", "11. Sustainability", "MANAGEMENT", "Life Science", "QUALITY", "0502 Environmental Science and Management", "soil quality", "910 Geography & travel", "Agricultural Science", "SDG 2 - Zero Hunger", "adoption", "550 Earth sciences & geology", "0105 earth and related environmental sciences", "2. Zero hunger", "Science & Technology", "environmental dimension", "S", "ECOLOGICAL INTENSIFICATION", "economic dimension", "3304 Urban and regional planning", "Agriculture", "15. Life on land", "ORGANIC-MATTER", "Environmental Sciences related to Agriculture and Land-use", "sociocultural dimension", "TERM FIELD EXPERIMENTS", "13. Climate action", "NO-TILLAGE", "GRAIN PRODUCTION", "Life Sciences & Biomedicine"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://eprints.glos.ac.uk/11159/1/11159%20Webb%2C%20et%20al%20%282022%29%20Soil-improving%20cropping%20systems%20for%20sustainable%20and%20profitable%20farming%20in%20Europe.pdf"}, {"href": "http://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/6/780/pdf"}, {"href": "https://pub.epsilon.slu.se/28669/1/hessel-r-et-al-220808.pdf"}, {"href": "https://boris.unibe.ch/170337/1/land-11-00780-v2.pdf"}, {"href": "https://www.research.unipd.it/bitstream/11577/3462064/1/land-11-00780.pdf"}, {"href": "https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/6/780/pdf"}, {"href": "https://eprints.ncl.ac.uk/fulltext.aspx?url=282070/A8C9E72D-16C8-421E-A19E-B021CC82D589.pdf&pub_id=282070"}, {"href": "https://doi.org/11250/3039583"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Land", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "11250/3039583", "name": "item", "description": "11250/3039583", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/11250/3039583"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2022-05-25T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "20.500.14243/467822", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-05-24T16:24:33Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2024-03-22", "title": "Do we speak one language on the way to sustainable soil management in Europe? A terminology check via an EU\u2010wide survey", "description": "Abstract                   <p>                     European soils are under increasing pressure, making it difficult to maintain the provision of soil ecosystem services (SESs). A better understanding of soil processes is needed to counteract soil threats (STs) and to promote sustainable soil management. The EJP SOIL programme of the EU provides a framework for the necessary research. However, different definitions of soil\uffe2\uff80\uff90related terms potentially lead to varied understandings of concepts. Furthermore, there are numerous indicators available to quantify STs or SESs. As unclear communication is a key barrier that hinders the implementation of research results into practice, this study aimed to answer the question about whether the terminology of large\uffe2\uff80\uff90scale initiatives is adequately understood within the soil\uffe2\uff80\uff90science community and non\uffe2\uff80\uff90research stakeholders. An online questionnaire was used to provide definitions for 33 soil\uffe2\uff80\uff90related terms in both scientific and plain language, as well as indicators for seven SESs and 11 STs. Participants were asked to rate their agreement with the definitions and indicators on a seven\uffe2\uff80\uff90grade Likert scale. The level of agreement was calculated as the percentage of ratings above 4, the neutral position. The survey was available from June to September 2023 and was distributed by a snowball approach. More than 260 stakeholders assessed the survey; 70% of respondents were researchers, and 15% were practitioners. Mean agreement levels for the definitions and indicators were generally high, at 85% and 78% respectively. However, it was apparent that the lowest agreement was found for terms that are relatively new, such as                     Ecosystem Services                     and                     Bundle                     , or unfamiliar for certain subgroups, such as ecological terms for stakeholders working at the farm scale. Due to their distinct majority, the results of this study primarily reflect the opinions of scientists. Thus, broad conclusions can only be drawn by comparing scientists with non\uffe2\uff80\uff90scientists. In this regard, the agreement was surprisingly high across all types of questions. The combined outcomes indicate that there is still a need to facilitate communication between stakeholders and to improve knowledge distribution strategies. Nevertheless, this study can support and be used by future projects and programmes, especially regarding the harmonization of terminology and methods.                   </p", "keywords": ["2. Zero hunger", "EJP SOIL", "soil science terminology", "soil indicators", "4. Education", "610", "sustainable soil management", "[SDV.SA.SDS]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences/Soil study", "15. Life on land", "soil threats", "16. Peace & justice", "333", "6. Clean water", "12. Responsible consumption", "soil policy stakeholders", "EJP SOIL", " soil indicators", " soil policy stakeholders", " soil science terminology", " soil threats", " soilbased ecosystem services", " sustainable soil management", "13. Climate action", "11. Sustainability", "soil-based ecosystem services", "[SDV.SA.SDS] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences/Soil study", "soil- based ecosystem services"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://iris.cnr.it/bitstream/20.500.14243/467822/1/European%20J%20Soil%20Science%20-%202024%20-%20Weninger%20-%20Do%20we%20speak%20one%20language%20on%20the%20way%20to%20sustainable%20soil%20management%20in%20Europe%20%20A.pdf"}, {"href": "https://doi.org/20.500.14243/467822"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/European%20Journal%20of%20Soil%20Science", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "20.500.14243/467822", "name": "item", "description": "20.500.14243/467822", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/20.500.14243/467822"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2024-03-01T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "234db5cc29f77296115d5719fbb6a5b6", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-05-24T16:24:45Z", "type": "Other", "title": "Sustainable soil management measures: a synthesis of stakeholder recommendations", "description": "Soil degradation threatens agricultural production and soil multifunctionality. Efforts for private and public governance are increasingly emerging to leverage sustainable soil management. They require consensus across science, policy, and practice about what sustainable soil management entails. Such agreement does not yet exist to a sufficient extent in agronomic terms; what is lacking is a concise list of soil management measures that enjoy broad support among all stakeholders, and evidence on the question what hampers their implementation by farmers. We therefore screened stakeholder documents from public governance institutions, nongovernmental organizations, the agricultural industry, and conventional and organic farmer associations for recommendations related to agricultural soil management in Germany. Out of 46 recommended measures in total, we compiled a shortlist of the seven most consensual ones: (1) structural landscape elements, (2) organic fertilization, (3) diversified crop rotation, (4) permanent soil cover, (5) conservation tillage, (6) reduced soil loads, and (7) optimized timing of wheeling. Together, these measures support all agricultural soil functions, and address all major soil threats except soil contamination. Implementation barriers were identified with the aid of an online survey among farmers (n = 78). Results showed that a vast majority of farmers (> 80%) approved of all measures. Barriers were mostly considered to be economic and in some cases technological, while missing knowledge or other factors were less relevant. Barriers were stronger for those measures that cannot be implemented in isolation, but require a systemic diversification of the production system. This is especially the case for measures that are simultaneously beneficial to many soil functions (measures 2, 3, and 4). Results confirm the need for a diversification of the agricultural system in order to meet challenges of food security and climate change. The shortlist presents the first integrative compilation of sustainable soil management measures supporting the design of effective public or private governance.", "keywords": ["Diversification in agriculture", "Soil health", "ddc:640", "ddc:630", "Sustainable soil management", "ddc:580", "Soil functions", "Agriculture in transition", "Stakeholder recommendations"], "contacts": [{"organization": "Strauss, Veronika, Paul, Carsten, D\u00f6nmez, Cenk, L\u00f6bmann, Michael, Helming, Katharina,", "roles": ["creator"]}]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/234db5cc29f77296115d5719fbb6a5b6"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "234db5cc29f77296115d5719fbb6a5b6", "name": "item", "description": "234db5cc29f77296115d5719fbb6a5b6", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/234db5cc29f77296115d5719fbb6a5b6"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2023-01-01T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "3176139766", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-05-24T16:25:15Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2021-06-24", "title": "Soil Health Evaluation of Farmland Based on Functional Soil Management\u2014A Case Study of Yixing City, Jiangsu Province, China", "description": "<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><article><p>Given that farmland serves as a strategic resource to ensure national food security, blind emphasis on the improvement of food production capacity can lead to soil overutilization and impair other soil functions. Hence, the evaluation of soil health (SH) should comprehensively take soil productivity and ecological environmental effects into account. In this study, five functions from the perspective of functional soil management were summarized, including primary productivity, provision and cycling of nutrients, the provision of functional and intrinsic biodiversity, water purification and regulation, and carbon sequestration and regulation. For each soil function, in view of the natural and ameliorable conditions affecting SH, basic indicators were selected from the two aspects of inherent and dynamic properties, and restrictive indicators were chosen considering the external properties or environmental elements, with the minimum limiting factor method coupled with weighted linear model. The new evaluation system was tested and verified in Yixing City, China. The healthy and optimally functional soils were concentrated in the northeast and mid-west of Yixing City, whereas unhealthy soils were predominant in the south and around Taihu Lake. The main limitations to SH improvement included cation exchange capacity, nutrient elements, and soluble carbon. The SH evaluation method was verified using the crop performance validation method, and a positive correlation was noted between food production stability index and soil health index, indicating that the evaluation system is reasonable.</p></article>", "keywords": ["2. Zero hunger", "soil obstacles", "soil health", "Agriculture (General)", "0401 agriculture", " forestry", " and fisheries", "sustainable soil management", "04 agricultural and veterinary sciences", "15. Life on land", "soil multifunctionality", "6. Clean water", "S1-972", "soil ecosystem services", "12. Responsible consumption"]}, "links": [{"href": "http://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/7/583/pdf"}, {"href": "https://doi.org/3176139766"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Agriculture", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "3176139766", "name": "item", "description": "3176139766", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/3176139766"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2021-06-24T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "oai:www.repo.uni-hannover.de:123456789/15581", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-05-24T16:31:40Z", "type": "Other", "title": "Sustainable soil management measures: a synthesis of stakeholder recommendations", "description": "Soil degradation threatens agricultural production and soil multifunctionality. Efforts for private and public governance are increasingly emerging to leverage sustainable soil management. They require consensus across science, policy, and practice about what sustainable soil management entails. Such agreement does not yet exist to a sufficient extent in agronomic terms; what is lacking is a concise list of soil management measures that enjoy broad support among all stakeholders, and evidence on the question what hampers their implementation by farmers. We therefore screened stakeholder documents from public governance institutions, nongovernmental organizations, the agricultural industry, and conventional and organic farmer associations for recommendations related to agricultural soil management in Germany. Out of 46 recommended measures in total, we compiled a shortlist of the seven most consensual ones: (1) structural landscape elements, (2) organic fertilization, (3) diversified crop rotation, (4) permanent soil cover, (5) conservation tillage, (6) reduced soil loads, and (7) optimized timing of wheeling. Together, these measures support all agricultural soil functions, and address all major soil threats except soil contamination. Implementation barriers were identified with the aid of an online survey among farmers (n = 78). Results showed that a vast majority of farmers (> 80%) approved of all measures. Barriers were mostly considered to be economic and in some cases technological, while missing knowledge or other factors were less relevant. Barriers were stronger for those measures that cannot be implemented in isolation, but require a systemic diversification of the production system. This is especially the case for measures that are simultaneously beneficial to many soil functions (measures 2, 3, and 4). Results confirm the need for a diversification of the agricultural system in order to meet challenges of food security and climate change. The shortlist presents the first integrative compilation of sustainable soil management measures supporting the design of effective public or private governance.", "keywords": ["Diversification in agriculture", "Soil health", "ddc:640", "ddc:630", "Sustainable soil management", "ddc:580", "Soil functions", "Agriculture in transition", "Stakeholder recommendations"], "contacts": [{"organization": "Strauss, Veronika, Paul, Carsten, D\u00f6nmez, Cenk, L\u00f6bmann, Michael, Helming, Katharina,", "roles": ["creator"]}]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/oai:www.repo.uni-hannover.de:123456789/15581"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "oai:www.repo.uni-hannover.de:123456789/15581", "name": "item", "description": "oai:www.repo.uni-hannover.de:123456789/15581", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/oai:www.repo.uni-hannover.de:123456789/15581"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2023-01-01T00:00:00Z"}}], "links": [{"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "This document as GeoJSON", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items?keywords=sustainable+soil+management&f=json", "hreflang": "en-US"}, {"rel": "alternate", "type": "text/html", "title": "This document as HTML", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items?keywords=sustainable+soil+management&f=html", "hreflang": "en-US"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection URL", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main", "hreflang": "en-US"}, {"type": "application/geo+json", "rel": "first", "title": "items (first)", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items?keywords=sustainable+soil+management&", "hreflang": "en-US"}, {"rel": "last", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "items (last)", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items?keywords=sustainable+soil+management&offset=23", "hreflang": "en-US"}], "numberMatched": 23, "numberReturned": 23, "distributedFeatures": [], "timeStamp": "2026-05-25T05:09:54.620561Z"}