{"type": "FeatureCollection", "features": [{"id": "10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.06.025", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-05-25T16:16:16Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2013-07-31", "title": "Land Use And Management Effects On Soil Organic Matter Fractions In Rhodic Ferralsols And Haplic Arenosols In Bindura And Shamva Districts Of Zimbabwe", "description": "Abstract   Soil organic carbon (SOC) is a major attribute of soil quality that responds to land management activities which is also important in the regulation of global carbon (C) cycling. This study evaluated bulk soil C and nitrogen (N) contents and C and N dynamics in three soil organic matter (SOM) fractions separated by density. The study was based on three tillage systems on farmer managed experiments (conventional tillage (CT), ripping (RP), direct seeding (DS)) and adjacent natural forest (NF) in Haplic Arenosols (sandy) and Rhodic Ferralsols (clayey) of Zimbabwe. Carbon stocks were significantly larger in forests than tillage systems, being significantly lower in sandy soils (15 and 14\u00a0Mg\u00a0C\u00a0ha\u2212\u00a01) than clayey soils (23 and 21\u00a0Mg\u00a0C\u00a0ha\u2212\u00a01) at 0\u201310 and 10\u201330\u00a0cm respectively. Nitrogen content followed the same trend. At the 0\u201310\u00a0cm depth, SOC stocks increased under CT, RP and DS by 0.10, 0.24, 0.36\u00a0Mg\u00a0ha\u2212\u00a01\u00a0yr\u2212\u00a01 and 0.76, 0.54, 0.10\u00a0Mg\u00a0ha\u2212\u00a01\u00a0yr\u2212\u00a01 on sandy and clayey soils respectively over a four year period while N stocks decreased by 0.55, 0.40, 0.56\u00a0Mg\u00a0ha\u2212\u00a01 and 0.63, 0.65, 0.55\u00a0Mg\u00a0ha\u2212\u00a01 respectively. SOM fractions were dominated by mineral associated heavy fraction (MaHF) which accounted for 86\u201393% and 94\u201398% on sandy and clayey soils respectively. Tillage systems on sandy soils had the smallest average free light fraction (fLF) and occluded light fraction (oLF) C stocks (25.3\u00a0\u00b1\u00a01.3 g m\u2212\u00a02 and 7.3\u00a0\u00b1\u00a01.2\u00a0g\u00a0m\u2212\u00a02) at 0\u201330\u00a0cm when compared with corresponding NF (58.4\u00a0\u00b1\u00a04 g\u00a0m2 and 18.5\u00a0\u00b1\u00a01.0\u00a0g\u00a0m\u2212\u00a02). Clayey soils, had the opposite, having all fLF C and N in tillage systems being higher (80.9\u00a0\u00b1\u00a012\u00a0g\u00a0C m\u2212\u00a02 and 2.7\u00a0\u00b1\u00a00.4\u00a0g\u00a0N\u00a0m\u2212\u00a02) than NF (57.4\u00a0\u00b1\u00a02.0\u00a0g\u00a0C\u00a0m\u2212\u00a02 and 2.4\u00a0\u00b1\u00a00.3\u00a0g\u00a0N\u00a0m\u2212\u00a02). Results suggest that oLF and MaHF C and N are better protected under DS and RP where they are less vulnerable to mineralisation while fLF contributes more in CT. Thus, DS and RP can be important in maintaining and improving soil quality although their practicability can be hampered by unsupportive institutional frameworks. Under prevailing climatic and management conditions, improvement of residue retention could be a major factor that can distinguish the potential of different management practices for C sequestration. The exploitation of the benefits of RP or DS and the corresponding sustainability of systems need support for surface cover retention which should also be extended to conventional tillage.", "keywords": ["2. Zero hunger", "pools", "microbial biomass", "assessment", "no-tillage", "dynamics", "04 agricultural and veterinary sciences", "15. Life on land", "term changes", "carbon sequestration", "stabilization", "soil organic carbon", "conservation agriculture", "soil organic matter", "tillage", "impact", "0401 agriculture", " forestry", " and fisheries", "climate", "density fractions", "agriculture"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.06.025"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Geoderma", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.06.025", "name": "item", "description": "10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.06.025", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.06.025"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2013-11-01T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.1108/00070700910992925", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-05-25T16:18:27Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2009-10-05", "title": "A meta-analysis of the differences in environmental impacts between organic and conventional farming", "description": "Purpose<p>This paper aims to perform a meta\uffe2\uff80\uff90analysis of the literature comparing the environmental impacts of organic and conventional farming and linking these to differences in management practises. The studied environmental impacts are related to land use efficiency, organic matter content in the soil, nitrate and phosphate leaching to the water system, greenhouse gas emissions and biodiversity.</p>Design/methodology/approach<p>The theoretic framework uses the driver\uffe2\uff80\uff90state\uffe2\uff80\uff90response framework and literature data were analysed using meta\uffe2\uff80\uff90analysis methodology. Meta\uffe2\uff80\uff90analysis is the statistical analysis of multiple study results. Data were obtained by screening peer reviewed literature.</p>Findings<p>From the paper's meta\uffe2\uff80\uff90analysis it can conclude that soils in organic farming systems have on average a higher content of organic matter. It can also conclude that organic farming contributes positively to agro\uffe2\uff80\uff90biodiversity (breeds used by the farmers) and natural biodiversity (wild life). Concerning the impact of the organic farming system on nitrate and phosphorous leaching and greenhouse gas emissions the result of the analysis is not that straightforward. When expressed per production area organic farming scores better than conventional farming for these items. However, given the lower land use efficiency of organic farming in developed countries, this positive effect expressed per unit product is less pronounced or not present at all.</p>Original value<p>Given the recent growth of organic farming and the general perception that organic farming is more environment friendly than its conventional counterpart, it is interesting to explore whether it meets the alleged benefits. By combining several studies in one analysis, the technique of meta\uffe2\uff80\uff90analysis is powerful and may allow the generation of more nuanced findings and the generalisation of those findings.</p>", "keywords": ["Agriculture and Food Sciences", "2. Zero hunger", "GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS", "Environmental management", "NEW-ZEALAND", "CROPPING SYSTEMS", "NITROUS-OXIDE", "SOUTHERN GERMANY", "Agriculture", "SOIL QUALITY INDICATORS", "04 agricultural and veterinary sciences", "MODELING APPROACH", "15. Life on land", "7. Clean energy", "Organic foods", "12. Responsible consumption", "Europe", "13. Climate action", "LEACHING LOSSES", "PHOSPHORUS P", "11. Sustainability", "0401 agriculture", " forestry", " and fisheries", "LONG-TERM CHANGES"], "contacts": [{"organization": "Mondelaers, Koen, Aertsens, Joris, Van Huylenbroeck, Guido,", "roles": ["creator"]}]}, "links": [{"href": "https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700910992925"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/British%20Food%20Journal", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.1108/00070700910992925", "name": "item", "description": "10.1108/00070700910992925", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.1108/00070700910992925"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2009-09-26T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.17221/65/2023-swr", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-05-25T16:19:47Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2023-09-13", "title": "Changes in grassland area in lowlands and marginal uplands: Medium-term differences and potential for carbon farming", "description": "Grassland as\u00a0a\u00a0part of\u00a0farmland is\u00a0important for agrobiodiversity, soil protection and agricultural production (grazing, hay production). In\u00a0the Czech Republic, grassland area increases with increasing altitude. In\u00a0this study we\u00a0evaluated the period 1966-2021 and the change in\u00a0grassland area in\u00a0different locations in\u00a0South Bohemia region: fertile lowlands (P\u00edsek, \u010cesk\u00e9 Bud\u011bjovice, T\u00e1bor districts) and marginal uplands (\u010cesk\u00fd Krumlov, Prachatice districts). Data on\u00a0land use including the share of\u00a0grassland were obtained from the Czech Cadastral and Surveying Office and Czech Statistical Office. In\u00a0the upland districts, there is\u00a0the largest share of\u00a0grassland areas in\u00a0the whole region. The prevalence of\u00a0grasslands is\u00a0probably due to\u00a0the geographic and climatic conditions, which are challenging here. Our research shows the results of\u00a0changes in\u00a0grassland areas between 1967 and 2021, with regard to\u00a0the assessed districts. The difference in\u00a0the percent area of\u00a0grassland in\u00a02021 compared to\u00a01967 is\u00a0-0.04 to\u00a0-1.77 for lowlands, and +1.45 to +5.99 for uplands. Despite this, uplands farmers practice relatively extensive farming methods and extensive grazing due to\u00a0low ruminant numbers. Although farmers maintain relevant carbon sinks, it\u00a0is unlikely to\u00a0increase the carbon stocks per hectare of\u00a0extensive grasslands on\u00a0an annual basis, which would be\u00a0a\u00a0barrier to\u00a0participation in\u00a0a\u00a0carbon farming system.", "keywords": ["2. Zero hunger", "S", "13. Climate action", "grasslands", "medium-term changes", "0401 agriculture", " forestry", " and fisheries", "Agriculture", "04 agricultural and veterinary sciences", "15. Life on land", "climate", "extensive management", "01 natural sciences", "0105 earth and related environmental sciences"]}, "links": [{"href": "http://swr.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/65/2023-SWR.pdf"}, {"href": "https://doi.org/10.17221/65/2023-swr"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Soil%20and%20Water%20Research", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.17221/65/2023-swr", "name": "item", "description": "10.17221/65/2023-swr", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.17221/65/2023-swr"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2023-10-30T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "10.5194/hess-26-3021-2022", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-05-25T16:21:49Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2022-06-17", "title": "Agricultural intensification vs. climate change: what drives long-term changes in sediment load?", "description": "<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><article><p>Abstract. Climate change and agricultural intensification are expected to increase soil erosion and sediment production from arable land in many regions. However, to date, most studies have been based on short-term monitoring and/or modeling, making it difficult to assess their reliability in terms of estimating long-term changes. We present the results of a unique data set consisting of measurements of sediment loads from a 60 ha catchment \u2013 the Hydrological Open Air Laboratory (HOAL) \u2013 in Petzenkirchen, Austria, which was observed periodically over a time period spanning 72 years. Specifically, we compare Period\u00a0I (1946\u20131954) and Period\u00a0II (2002\u20132017) by fitting sediment rating curves (SRCs) for the growth and dormant seasons for each of the periods. The results suggest a significant increase in sediment loads from Period\u00a0I to Period\u00a0II, with an average of 5.8\u2009\u00b1\u20093.8 to 60.0\u2009\u00b1\u2009140.0\u2009t\u2009yr\u22121. The sediment flux changed mainly due to a shift in the SRCs, given that the mean daily discharge significantly decreased from 5.0\u2009\u00b1\u200914.5\u2009L\u2009s\u22121 for Period\u00a0I to 3.8\u2009\u00b1\u20096.6\u2009L\u2009s\u22121 for Period\u00a0II. The slopes of the SRCs for the growing season and the dormant season of Period\u00a0I were 0.3 and 0.8, respectively, whereas they were 1.6 and 1.7 for Period\u00a0II, respectively. Climate change, considered in terms of rainfall erosivity, was not responsible for this shift, because erosivity decreased by 30.4\u2009% from the dormant season of Period\u00a0I to that of Period\u00a0II, and no significant difference was found between the growing seasons of periods I and II. However, the change in sediment flux can be explained by land use and land cover change (LUCC) and the change in land structure (i.e., the organization of land parcels). Under low- and median-streamflow conditions, the land structure in Period\u00a0II (i.e., the parcel effect) had no apparent influence on sediment yield. With increasing streamflow, it became more important in controlling sediment yield, as a result of an enhanced sediment connectivity in the landscape, leading to a dominant role under high-flow conditions. The increase in crops that make the landscape prone to erosion and the change in land uses between periods I and II led to an increase in sediment flux, although its relevance was surpassed by the effect of parcel structure change under high-flow conditions. We conclude that LUCC and land structure change should be accounted for when assessing sediment flux changes. Especially under high-flow conditions, land structure change substantially altered sediment fluxes, which is most relevant for long-term sediment loads and land degradation. Therefore, increased attention to improving land structure is needed in climate adaptation and agricultural catchment management.                     </p></article>", "keywords": ["2. Zero hunger", "Technology", "T", "0208 environmental biotechnology", "0207 environmental engineering", "02 engineering and technology", "15. Life on land", "Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering", "6. Clean water", "G", "Environmental sciences", "Agricultural intensification vs. climate change: what drives long-term changes in sediment load", "13. Climate action", "Geography. Anthropology. Recreation", "GE1-350", "TD1-1066"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://cris.unibo.it/bitstream/11585/1012887/1/2022_Wang_HESS.pdf"}, {"href": "https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/26/3021/2022/hess-26-3021-2022.pdf"}, {"href": "https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3021-2022"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Hydrology%20and%20Earth%20System%20Sciences", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "10.5194/hess-26-3021-2022", "name": "item", "description": "10.5194/hess-26-3021-2022", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/10.5194/hess-26-3021-2022"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2022-06-17T00:00:00Z"}}, {"id": "11585/1012887", "type": "Feature", "geometry": null, "properties": {"updated": "2026-05-25T16:24:52Z", "type": "Journal Article", "created": "2022-06-17", "title": "Agricultural intensification vs. climate change: what drives long-term changes in sediment load?", "description": "<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><article><p>Abstract. Climate change and agricultural intensification are expected to increase soil erosion and sediment production from arable land in many regions. However, to date, most studies have been based on short-term monitoring and/or modeling, making it difficult to assess their reliability in terms of estimating long-term changes. We present the results of a unique data set consisting of measurements of sediment loads from a 60 ha catchment \u2013 the Hydrological Open Air Laboratory (HOAL) \u2013 in Petzenkirchen, Austria, which was observed periodically over a time period spanning 72 years. Specifically, we compare Period\u00a0I (1946\u20131954) and Period\u00a0II (2002\u20132017) by fitting sediment rating curves (SRCs) for the growth and dormant seasons for each of the periods. The results suggest a significant increase in sediment loads from Period\u00a0I to Period\u00a0II, with an average of 5.8\u2009\u00b1\u20093.8 to 60.0\u2009\u00b1\u2009140.0\u2009t\u2009yr\u22121. The sediment flux changed mainly due to a shift in the SRCs, given that the mean daily discharge significantly decreased from 5.0\u2009\u00b1\u200914.5\u2009L\u2009s\u22121 for Period\u00a0I to 3.8\u2009\u00b1\u20096.6\u2009L\u2009s\u22121 for Period\u00a0II. The slopes of the SRCs for the growing season and the dormant season of Period\u00a0I were 0.3 and 0.8, respectively, whereas they were 1.6 and 1.7 for Period\u00a0II, respectively. Climate change, considered in terms of rainfall erosivity, was not responsible for this shift, because erosivity decreased by 30.4\u2009% from the dormant season of Period\u00a0I to that of Period\u00a0II, and no significant difference was found between the growing seasons of periods I and II. However, the change in sediment flux can be explained by land use and land cover change (LUCC) and the change in land structure (i.e., the organization of land parcels). Under low- and median-streamflow conditions, the land structure in Period\u00a0II (i.e., the parcel effect) had no apparent influence on sediment yield. With increasing streamflow, it became more important in controlling sediment yield, as a result of an enhanced sediment connectivity in the landscape, leading to a dominant role under high-flow conditions. The increase in crops that make the landscape prone to erosion and the change in land uses between periods I and II led to an increase in sediment flux, although its relevance was surpassed by the effect of parcel structure change under high-flow conditions. We conclude that LUCC and land structure change should be accounted for when assessing sediment flux changes. Especially under high-flow conditions, land structure change substantially altered sediment fluxes, which is most relevant for long-term sediment loads and land degradation. Therefore, increased attention to improving land structure is needed in climate adaptation and agricultural catchment management.</p></article>", "keywords": ["2. Zero hunger", "Technology", "T", "0208 environmental biotechnology", "0207 environmental engineering", "02 engineering and technology", "15. Life on land", "Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering", "6. Clean water", "G", "Environmental sciences", "Agricultural intensification vs. climate change: what drives long-term changes in sediment load", "13. Climate action", "Geography. Anthropology. Recreation", "GE1-350", "TD1-1066"]}, "links": [{"href": "https://cris.unibo.it/bitstream/11585/1012887/1/2022_Wang_HESS.pdf"}, {"href": "https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/26/3021/2022/hess-26-3021-2022.pdf"}, {"href": "https://doi.org/11585/1012887"}, {"rel": "related", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/Hydrology%20and%20Earth%20System%20Sciences", "name": "related record", "description": "related record", "type": "application/json"}, {"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "11585/1012887", "name": "item", "description": "11585/1012887", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items/11585/1012887"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection", "name": "collection", "description": "Collection", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main"}], "time": {"date": "2022-06-17T00:00:00Z"}}], "links": [{"rel": "self", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "This document as GeoJSON", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items?keywords=term+changes&f=json", "hreflang": "en-US"}, {"rel": "alternate", "type": "text/html", "title": "This document as HTML", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items?keywords=term+changes&f=html", "hreflang": "en-US"}, {"rel": "collection", "type": "application/json", "title": "Collection URL", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main", "hreflang": "en-US"}, {"type": "application/geo+json", "rel": "first", "title": "items (first)", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items?keywords=term+changes&", "hreflang": "en-US"}, {"rel": "last", "type": "application/geo+json", "title": "items (last)", "href": "https://repository.soilwise-he.eu/cat/collections/metadata:main/items?keywords=term+changes&offset=5", "hreflang": "en-US"}], "numberMatched": 5, "numberReturned": 5, "distributedFeatures": [], "timeStamp": "2026-05-26T00:10:16.398107Z"}